ACIT22(1), MUMBAI vs. UNIQUE BANGLES, MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed
ITA 7427/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Mar 2026AY 2023-24
Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokaracit-22(1) Unique Bangles, 322, Piramal 232/234, Shah & Chambers, Mumbai – Vs. Nahar Industrial 400 013. Estate, S. J. Mar, Dhanraj Mill Compound, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400019 Pan/Gir No. Aadfu8125A (Applicant) (Respondent) Revenue By Shri Vivek Perampurna, Ld. Dr Assessee By Shri Subhash Chhajed & Shri Sunil Vankawala, Ld. Ars Date Of Hearing 09.03.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 16.03.2026
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 68
section 194Q of the Act. The learned DR drew our attention to the chart of purchases and TDS computation furnished