BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Qclear

Sorted by relevance

Jodhpur22Delhi19Chandigarh12Mumbai7Visakhapatnam6Jaipur5Bangalore3Ahmedabad2Kolkata2Lucknow2Hyderabad1Chennai1Pune1Rajkot1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 44B30Section 143(3)10Section 145A6Section 194Q4Section 143(1)4TDS4Addition to Income4Section 403Section 2502Section 144B

DADIBA KALI PUNDOLE ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMEM TAX -17(1), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3265/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jul 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Amey Wagle & Shri AzimFor Respondent: 07.07.2025
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 194QSection 234Section 234CSection 246ASection 250

TDS deducted u/s 194Q are as under: 7.5.4 Sec 194Q of the Income Tax Act says that - [Deduction of tax at source on payment of certain sum for purchase of goods. 194Q. (1) Any person, being a buyer who is responsible for paying any sum to any resident (hereafter in this section

2
Disallowance2

PARVIN KUMAR NAGPAL,M/S KHEM CHAND NAGPAL vs. ADDL JCIT (A)-8, MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed as\nwithdrawn

ITA 620/MUM/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Oct 2024AY 2022-23
Section 194QSection 250

TDS\nclaimed under section 194Q of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the wrong\ninterpretation of law and facts.”\nPage

ACIT22(1), MUMBAI vs. UNIQUE BANGLES, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 7427/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Mar 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokaracit-22(1) Unique Bangles, 322, Piramal 232/234, Shah & Chambers, Mumbai – Vs. Nahar Industrial 400 013. Estate, S. J. Mar, Dhanraj Mill Compound, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400019 Pan/Gir No. Aadfu8125A (Applicant) (Respondent) Revenue By Shri Vivek Perampurna, Ld. Dr Assessee By Shri Subhash Chhajed & Shri Sunil Vankawala, Ld. Ars Date Of Hearing 09.03.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 16.03.2026

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 68

section 194Q of the Act. The learned DR drew our attention to the chart of purchases and TDS computation furnished

ORIENT OVERSEAS CONTAINER LINE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-CIRCLE 3(2)(2) , MUMBAI

ITA 3278/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Oct 2024AY 2020-21
Section 143(3)Section 44B

TDS provisions and CBDT\nhas clarified through various circulars that if GST services are\nindicated separately in the invoice then no tax would be\ndeducted at GST components. By way of illustration following\ncirculars have been referred to before us under various\nSections:-\nSr.No.\nCircular No.\nRelevant Section\n1.\nCircular No. 5 of 2023\nSection 194BA\n2.\nCircular

OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL GMBH,MUMBAI vs. DCIT(INT. TAXATION)RANGE-3(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, ground no. 4 of the appeal is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 802/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Apr 2025AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Shri Abdul Kadir Jawadwala ARFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 145ASection 153Section 254(1)Section 44B

TDS provisions and CBDT has clarified through various circulars that if\nGST services are indicated separately in the invoice then no tax would be\ndeducted at GST components. By way of illustration following circulars have\nbeen referred to before us under various sections:-\n\nSr. No\nCircular No.\nRelevant Section\n1\nCircular No. 5 of 2023\nSection 194BA\n2\nCircular

SEADRILL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-4(2)(1), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4700/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jan 2025AY 2021-22
Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 270ASection 44B

TDS provisions and CBDT has clarified through various\ncirculars that if GST services are indicated separately in the invoice then no\ntax would be deducted at GST components. By way of illustration following\ncirculars have been referred to before us under various Sections:-\nSr.No.\nCircular No.\nRelevant Section\nCircular No. 5 of 2023\nSection 194BA\nCircular

OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL GMBH,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) RANGE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, ground of appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6705/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Dec 2025AY 2023-24
For Appellant: Shri A.K. JawadwalaFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 172Section 44B

TDS provisions and CBDT has clarified through various circulars that\nif GST services are indicated separately in the invoice then no tax would be\ndeducted at GST components. By way of illustration following circulars have\nbeen referred to before us under various sections:-\n\nSr. No\nCircular No.\nRelevant Section\n1\nCircular No. 5 of 2023\nSection 194BA\n2\nCircular