CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (MANORI BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (HILL ROAD BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (MAHIM BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (MAROL BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (GOREGAON BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (MALAD BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (SAHAR BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ( SANTACRUZ BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (KALINA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (KULA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (MANORI BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED( FOUR BUNGALOWS BRANCH) ,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ,(FOUR BUNGALOWS BRANCH) vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (CHEMBUR BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZEN CREDIT CO.OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4),, MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (GOREGAON BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (BYCULLA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it was under no obligation to deduct tax at source on credit or payment of such interest to the Co-op. housing societies de hors the quantum of such interest. The Id. AR relied on paragraph 42.7 of Circular No.19/2015, dated 27.11.2015, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2015, that the existing