BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 32(1)(iia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai266Delhi202Chennai147Ahmedabad119Kolkata118Bangalore61Pune44Cochin44Raipur37Hyderabad35Jaipur31Nagpur23Indore16Cuttack9Lucknow9Surat8Guwahati8Rajkot8Jodhpur7Chandigarh7Visakhapatnam5Karnataka4Agra4Calcutta3SC2Amritsar2Panaji1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 1488Addition to Income8Section 40A(3)6Disallowance6Section 685Section 32(1)(iia)4Section 143(1)3Undisclosed Income3Depreciation3Section 133(6)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BAREILLY, BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 619/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 153C

iia) any asset, not being an investment or deposit in any of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11, where such asset is not held by the trust or institution, otherwise than in any of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11, after the expiry of one year from

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW

2
Section 12A2
Section 153C2

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 620/LKW/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 153C

iia) any asset, not being an investment or deposit in any of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11, where such asset is not held by the trust or institution, otherwise than in any of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11, after the expiry of one year from

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, KANPUR vs. COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO. LTD., KANPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 658/LKW/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Maduk, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Shri B. L. Gupta, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(1)(iia)

section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are squarely applicable in this case. 2. That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kanpur has erred in law as well as on facts and circumstances of the case ITA No.657 & 658/LKW/2018 Page 2 of 24 in deleting the addition of Rs.9,57,30,050/- made on account

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, KANPUR vs. COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO. LTD., KANPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 657/LKW/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Maduk, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Shri B. L. Gupta, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(1)(iia)

section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are squarely applicable in this case. 2. That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kanpur has erred in law as well as on facts and circumstances of the case ITA No.657 & 658/LKW/2018 Page 2 of 24 in deleting the addition of Rs.9,57,30,050/- made on account

ABHAY BENARA,KANPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 267/LKW/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow13 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2013-14 Abhay Benara, The Deputy V. Commissioner Of Income C/O 24/4, The Mall Kanpur-208001. Tax, Central Circle-1 Kanpur. Pan:Adlpb2007Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, Adv. Respondent By: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 10 12 2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 13 12 2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl
Section 143(2)Section 57Section 68

1) and (2)] of section 32 and subject to the provisions of [section 38]. (iia)[ in the case of income in the nature of family pension, a deduction of a sum equal to thirty-three and one-third per cent of such income or ]fifteen] thousand rupees, whichever is less. Explanation. - For the purposes of this clause, "family pension" means

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BAREILLY vs. M/S L.H SUGAR FACTORY PVT. LTD.,, PILIBHIT

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 416/LKW/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Jan 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 260A

32(1)(iia) of the Act, Learned A. R. submitted that assessee was entitled to additional depreciation as during earlier year the assessee was allowed only 50% of additional depreciation and balance 50% was to be allowed by Assessing Officer during the present year and which the Assessing Officer had not taken into consideration while calculating the taxable profits

SURYA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 323/LKW/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(1)Section 2(8)Section 40A(3)

32,430/-. An intimation was issued to the assessee u/s 143(1) of the Act, wherein adjustments were made and total income was determined at Rs.2,30,50,770/- after the adjustment. The aforesaid adjustments included an amount of Rs.1,75,00,000/- on account of bank guarantee. Further, an adjustment of Rs.3,08,342/- was also made on account

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S SHRI RAMSWAROOP CHARITABLE TRUST, LUCKNOW

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 557/LKW/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoora.Y. 2013-14

Section 11Section 32Section 68

32 of the Act providing for depreciation, for computation, of income derived from business or profession is not applicable. However, the income of the trust is 13 required to be computed under section 11 on commercial principles after providing for allowance for normal depreciation and deduction thereof from the gross income of the trust.” 8. In our opinion, the ration

INCOME TAX OFFICER (E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. VIKAT EDUCATIONAL TRUST, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and cross objection of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 394/LKW/2020[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Lucknow16 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2017-18 Income Tax Officer M/S. Vikat Educational V. (Exemption) Trust T.C. 46V, 5Th Floor, U.P.S.I.D.C 32-A, Chandralok, Ltd, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Aliganj, Lucknow-226020. Nagar, Lucknow-226010. Pan: Aaecc5529M (Appellant) (Respondent) C. O. No. 2/Lkw/2022 (In Arising Out Of Ita. No. 394/Lkw/2020) Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Vikat Educational Trust Ito (Exemption) V. 32-A, Chandralok, Aliganj, 4Th Floor, Pratyaksha Kar Lucknow-226020. Bhawan, Ram Tirath Marg, Lucknow-226001. Pan: Aabtv6124D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shyam Lal, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 05 05 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 16 05 2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Lal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl
Section 115BSection 68

32-A, Chandralok, Aliganj, 4th Floor, Pratyaksha Kar Lucknow-226020. Bhawan, Ram Tirath Marg, Lucknow-226001. PAN: AABTV6124D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Shyam Lal, C.A. Respondent by: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl. CIT(DR) Date of hearing: 05 05 2025 Date of pronouncement: 16 05 2025 O R D E R PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.: These appeal