ROHILKHAND EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST,BAREILLY vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BAREILLY

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA No

charitable trust and no tax benefit could\naccrue on claiming bogus expenditure as the income of the trust was not\nchargeable to tax on account of the availability of exemption under section 11.\nFurthermore, in assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, no\nsuch disallowance

M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed whereas the Cross Objections of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

trust engaged in the achievement of object of general public utility in view of the insertion of proviso to section 2(15) with effect from 01/04/2009. It was submitted that Hon'ble Court has held that the Page 13 of 86 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) object of general public utility shall not be a charitable purpose if it involves

M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed whereas the Cross Objections of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

trust engaged in the achievement of object of general public utility in view of the insertion of proviso to section 2(15) with effect from 01/04/2009. It was submitted that Hon'ble Court has held that the Page 13 of 86 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) object of general public utility shall not be a charitable purpose if it involves

M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed whereas the Cross Objections of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

trust engaged in the achievement of object of general public utility in view of the insertion of proviso to section 2(15) with effect from 01/04/2009. It was submitted that Hon'ble Court has held that the Page 13 of 86 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) object of general public utility shall not be a charitable purpose if it involves

INCOME TAX OFFICER-(EXEPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S GRAMEEN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year:2014-15

charitable purpose in hands of donor trust and donor I.T.A. No.719/Lkw/2017 Assessment Year:2014-15 9 trust will not loose exemption u/s 11 of the Act of the donations during the year of receipt itself. The decision of Hon'ble Gujrat High Court in case of Nirmala Baku Bhai Foundation (1997) 226 ITR 394 (Guj.) too is in favour

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

charitable purpose, there is no applicability of section 68 particularly when the explanations and supportive documents were submitted by the assessee to substantiate its position and donation being to the corpus of the trust are capital receipt. Accordingly, section 115BBE is not applicable on the assessee. On the basis of the above submissions, it is very clear that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BAREILLY, BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

charitable purpose, there is no applicability of section 68 particularly when the explanations and supportive documents were submitted by the assessee to substantiate its position and donation being to the corpus of the trust are capital receipt. Accordingly, section 115BBE is not applicable on the assessee. On the basis of the above submissions, it is very clear that

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,LUCKNOW vs. DCIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Charitable Trust reported in [1995] 78 taxman 98 (Pat.). It was submitted that Assessing Officer himself, in assessment year 2018-19 u/s 143(3), has allowed exemption u/s 11 of the Act and our attention was invited to paper book pages 361 to 363 where a copy of such assessment order was placed. Our attention was also invited

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Charitable Trust reported in [1995] 78 taxman 98 (Pat.). It was submitted that Assessing Officer himself, in assessment year 2018-19 u/s 143(3), has allowed exemption u/s 11 of the Act and our attention was invited to paper book pages 361 to 363 where a copy of such assessment order was placed. Our attention was also invited

LUCKNOW EVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,LUCKNOW vs. I.T.O., LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Charitable Trust reported in [1995] 78 taxman 98 (Pat.). It was submitted that Assessing Officer himself, in assessment year 2018-19 u/s 143(3), has allowed exemption u/s 11 of the Act and our attention was invited to paper book pages 361 to 363 where a copy of such assessment order was placed. Our attention was also invited

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Charitable Trust reported in [1995] 78 taxman 98 (Pat.). It was submitted that Assessing Officer himself, in assessment year 2018-19 u/s 143(3), has allowed exemption u/s 11 of the Act and our attention was invited to paper book pages 361 to 363 where a copy of such assessment order was placed. Our attention was also invited

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Charitable Trust reported in [1995] 78 taxman 98 (Pat.). It was submitted that Assessing Officer himself, in assessment year 2018-19 u/s 143(3), has allowed exemption u/s 11 of the Act and our attention was invited to paper book pages 361 to 363 where a copy of such assessment order was placed. Our attention was also invited

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,LUCKNOW vs. DCIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

charitable purposes, when subsequently it is found that its income either enures or is used or applied directly or indirectly for the benefit of any person specified under sub-section (3) of section 13, then such trust becomes disentitled to claim any exemption under section 11. But the list of such persons as contained under section 13(3 ) does

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,LUCKNOW vs. DCIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

charitable purposes, when subsequently it is found that its income either enures or is used or applied directly or indirectly for the benefit of any person specified under sub-section (3) of section 13, then such trust becomes disentitled to claim any exemption under section 11. But the list of such persons as contained under section 13(3 ) does

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,LUCKNOW vs. DCIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

charitable purposes, when subsequently it is found that its income either enures or is used or applied directly or indirectly for the benefit of any person specified under sub-section (3) of section 13, then such trust becomes disentitled to claim any exemption under section 11. But the list of such persons as contained under section 13(3 ) does

U.P HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3), LUCKNOW

In the result ITA Nos.532 & 533/Lkw/2014 and ITA Nos

charitable trust, it was not income and expenditure which had to be considered but, receipts and expenditure. All the receipts had to necessarily be accounted for in the return of income. With regard to the disallowance

INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3), LUCKNOW vs. U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result ITA Nos.532 & 533/Lkw/2014 and ITA Nos

charitable trust, it was not income and\nexpenditure which had to be considered but, receipts and expenditure. All the\nreceipts had to necessarily be accounted for in the return of income. With regard to\nthe disallowance

INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3), LUCKNOW vs. U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result ITA Nos.532 & 533/Lkw/2014 and ITA Nos

charitable trust, it was not income and\nexpenditure which had to be considered but, receipts and expenditure. All the\nreceipts had to necessarily be accounted for in the return of income. With regard to\nthe disallowance

U.P HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(3), LUCKNOW

charitable trust, it was not income and\nexpenditure which had to be considered but, receipts and expenditure. All the\nreceipts had to necessarily be accounted for in the return of income. With regard to\nthe disallowance