BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “charitable trust”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi204Chennai106Mumbai78Bangalore76Hyderabad64Jaipur55Cochin29Pune25Chandigarh17Ahmedabad17Amritsar12Lucknow11Kolkata10Surat6Nagpur5Patna4Agra4Raipur3Indore2Allahabad2Cuttack2Dehradun2Guwahati2Rajkot2Visakhapatnam1SC1Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 6921Addition to Income9Undisclosed Income9Natural Justice9Section 1488Section 132A7Section 133A7Unexplained Investment7Search & Seizure7

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 620/LKW/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 153C

undisclosed income by way of donations. The aforesaid amount of Rs.3,75,00,000/- consisted of Rs.75,00,000/- from Anandilal & Ganesh Podar Society, Rs.50,00,000/- from Podar Education & Sports Trust, a further amount of Rs.1,50,00,000/- from Podar Education & Sports Trust and Rs.1,00,00,000/- from Podar Education Trust. The Assessing Officer had conducted inquiry

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BAREILLY, BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW

Survey u/s 133A7
Section 12A6
Section 80G6

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 619/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 153C

undisclosed income by way of donations. The aforesaid amount of Rs.3,75,00,000/- consisted of Rs.75,00,000/- from Anandilal & Ganesh Podar Society, Rs.50,00,000/- from Podar Education & Sports Trust, a further amount of Rs.1,50,00,000/- from Podar Education & Sports Trust and Rs.1,00,00,000/- from Podar Education Trust. The Assessing Officer had conducted inquiry

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 390/LKW/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

Charitable 4000000 trust Construction of Maa Sharda 5000000 Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Out of unexplained investment/ 1000000 Expenditure For Vikas Nagar 43000000 77200000 The above reconciliation submitted by the assessee is not acceptable because the amount was surrendered as a whole against various properties and there is no justification for excluding the cost of construction prior

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 392/LKW/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

Charitable 4000000 trust Construction of Maa Sharda 5000000 Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Out of unexplained investment/ 1000000 Expenditure For Vikas Nagar 43000000 77200000 The above reconciliation submitted by the assessee is not acceptable because the amount was surrendered as a whole against various properties and there is no justification for excluding the cost of construction prior

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 393/LKW/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

Charitable 4000000 trust Construction of Maa Sharda 5000000 Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Out of unexplained investment/ 1000000 Expenditure For Vikas Nagar 43000000 77200000 The above reconciliation submitted by the assessee is not acceptable because the amount was surrendered as a whole against various properties and there is no justification for excluding the cost of construction prior

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 391/LKW/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

Charitable 4000000 trust Construction of Maa Sharda 5000000 Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Out of unexplained investment/ 1000000 Expenditure For Vikas Nagar 43000000 77200000 The above reconciliation submitted by the assessee is not acceptable because the amount was surrendered as a whole against various properties and there is no justification for excluding the cost of construction prior

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 395/LKW/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

Charitable 4000000 trust Construction of Maa Sharda 5000000 Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Out of unexplained investment/ 1000000 Expenditure For Vikas Nagar 43000000 77200000 The above reconciliation submitted by the assessee is not acceptable because the amount was surrendered as a whole against various properties and there is no justification for excluding the cost of construction prior

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 394/LKW/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

Charitable 4000000 trust Construction of Maa Sharda 5000000 Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Out of unexplained investment/ 1000000 Expenditure For Vikas Nagar 43000000 77200000 The above reconciliation submitted by the assessee is not acceptable because the amount was surrendered as a whole against various properties and there is no justification for excluding the cost of construction prior

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 396/LKW/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

Charitable 4000000 trust Construction of Maa Sharda 5000000 Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Out of unexplained investment/ 1000000 Expenditure For Vikas Nagar 43000000 77200000 The above reconciliation submitted by the assessee is not acceptable because the amount was surrendered as a whole against various properties and there is no justification for excluding the cost of construction prior

TULSI GRAMODYOG SEWA SAMITI,LUCKNOW vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 217/LKW/2022[00]Status: FixedITAT Lucknow22 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Trust is not having any charitable activities, and also the activities are non- genuine. It is emphasized that the additions made on account 9 undisclosed income

TULSI GRAMODYOG SEWA SAMITI,,LUCKNOW vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 224/LKW/2022[00]Status: FixedITAT Lucknow22 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Trust is not having any charitable activities, and also the activities are non- genuine. It is emphasized that the additions made on account 9 undisclosed income