BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 35(2)(ab)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka102Mumbai82Bangalore46Chennai40Delhi40Chandigarh29Cochin27Jaipur27Hyderabad19Ahmedabad16Cuttack16Pune15Indore12Kolkata10Lucknow7Agra6Kerala5Dehradun4Varanasi2Rajasthan1Rajkot1SC1Surat1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Telangana1Jodhpur1Visakhapatnam1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 12A25Section 1488Charitable Trust7Addition to Income5Section 143(3)4Section 114Section 13(3)4Exemption4Section 133(6)2

ROHILKHAND EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST,BAREILLY vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BAREILLY

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 181/LKW/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.181 & 182/Lkw/2024 A.Ys.2017-18 & 2018-19 Rohilkhand Educational Vs. Dcit, Charitable Trust, Bareilly Central Circle, Bareilly Pan: Aaatr6902J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assesseeby: Sh. Rakesh Garg, Adv Revenue By: Sh. S.H. Usmani, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.09.2025 O R D E R Per Bench: [ These Two Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-3, Lucknow Dated 19.03.2024 & 22.03.2024, Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, For The A.Ys. 2017-18 & 2018-19, Dismissing The Appeals Of The Assessee Against Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- “(1).That The Ld. Authorities Below Have Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Not Considering The Fact That In The Alleged Assessment Order, The Columns Of Name Of Assessee, Pan, Asst Year, Date Of Assessment & Section Under Which Passed, Are Blank. (2)That The Ld. Authorities Below Have Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Treating The Demand As Valid Which Was Not Computed On The Basis Of Orderthat May Not Be Termed To Be An Order Under Section 143(3). (3) That A Demand Of Tax As Computed In The Computation Sheet Is Without Jurisdiction Void-Ab-Inito & Is Liable To Be Annulled. (4) That The Ld. Authorities Below Have Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Confirming The Addition Of Rs. 736591857/-Comprising  Corpus Donation Aggregating To Rs 7,68,95,000/-, A.Ys. 2017-18 & 2018-19

For Appellant: Sh. Rakesh Garg, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S.H. Usmani, CIT DR
Section 11
Section 153C2
Section 142(1)2
Unexplained Money2
Section 11(1)
Section 11(2)
Section 12A
Section 13(3)
Section 143(3)
Section 250
Section 80G
Section 80G(5)

Charitable Trust, Bareilly Central Circle, Bareilly PAN: AAATR6902J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assesseeby: Sh. Rakesh Garg, Adv Revenue by: Sh. S.H. Usmani, CIT DR Date of hearing: 14.08.2025 Date of pronouncement: 22.09.2025 O R D E R PER BENCH: [ These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)-3, Lucknow dated

ROHILKHAND EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST,BAREILLY vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BAREILLY

ITA 182/LKW/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Rakesh Garg, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S.H. Usmani, CIT DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 13(3)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80G(5)

ab initio, it was liable to be annulled. It was also argued that even the alleged assessment order was void, because the columns of the name of the assessee, PAN, assessment year, date of assessment and section under which the order was passed, all had been left blank. Therefore, it was submitted that the entire demand was infructuous, without jurisdiction

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BAREILLY, BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 619/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 153C

charitable or religious institution, any income thereof, if for any period during the previous year— (i) any funds of the trust or institution are invested or deposited after the 28th day of February, 1983 otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11; or (ii) any funds

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), BAREILLY vs. VARUNARJUN TRUST, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 620/LKW/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 153C

charitable or religious institution, any income thereof, if for any period during the previous year— (i) any funds of the trust or institution are invested or deposited after the 28th day of February, 1983 otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11; or (ii) any funds

ASHOK KIRAN CHARITABLE TRUST,BAREILLY vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

ITA 158/LKW/2019[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Oct 2021

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: N.A. Ashok Kiran Charitable Trust V. The Cit (E) 35-C-8, Rampur Garden Lucknow Bareilly Tan/Pan:Aafta2618B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: N.A. Ashok Kiran Charitable Trust V. The Cit (E) 35-C-8, Rampur Garden Lucknow Bareilly Tan/Pan:Aafta2618B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri P. K. Kapoor, C.A. Respondent By: Smt. Sheela Chopra, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 14 09 2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 02 11 2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri P. K. Kapoor, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Sheela Chopra, CIT (DR)
Section 1Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 13(3)

35-C-8, Rampur Garden Lucknow Bareilly TAN/PAN:AAFTA2618B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri P. K. Kapoor, C.A. Respondent by: Smt. Sheela Chopra, CIT (DR) Date of hearing: 14 09 2021 Date of pronouncement: 02 11 2021 O R D E R PER A.D. JAIN, V.P.: These appeals are by the assessee against the separate orders

ASHOK KIRAN CHARITABLE TRUST,BAREILLY vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

ITA 642/LKW/2018[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Oct 2021

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: N.A. Ashok Kiran Charitable Trust V. The Cit (E) 35-C-8, Rampur Garden Lucknow Bareilly Tan/Pan:Aafta2618B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: N.A. Ashok Kiran Charitable Trust V. The Cit (E) 35-C-8, Rampur Garden Lucknow Bareilly Tan/Pan:Aafta2618B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri P. K. Kapoor, C.A. Respondent By: Smt. Sheela Chopra, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 14 09 2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 02 11 2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri P. K. Kapoor, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Sheela Chopra, CIT (DR)
Section 1Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 13(3)

35-C-8, Rampur Garden Lucknow Bareilly TAN/PAN:AAFTA2618B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri P. K. Kapoor, C.A. Respondent by: Smt. Sheela Chopra, CIT (DR) Date of hearing: 14 09 2021 Date of pronouncement: 02 11 2021 O R D E R PER A.D. JAIN, V.P.: These appeals are by the assessee against the separate orders

HIND CHARITABLE TRUST,LUCKNOW vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), LUCKNOW

The appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 26/LKW/2021[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow27 Feb 2026

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: Na Hind Charitable Trust Vs. Pcit(Central) Lucknow Block B, Church Road, Indira Uttar Pradesh-226010. Nagar, Lucknow-226016. Tan/Pan:Aaath5498M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G. C. Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. K. Agarwal,CIT (DR)
Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 132

ab initio as the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Lucknow lacked the requisite jurisdiction to cancel the registration under section 12AA of the Act, a power exclusively vested in the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)”. 3.0 For the sake of completeness, it is also worth mentioning that the assessee had approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, (ITAT) Lucknow