THAKUR ROSHAN SINGH,BAREILLY vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) WARD, BAREILLY
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 530/LKW/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Nov 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2018-19 Thakur Roshan Singh, Smirti Sansthan, Vs. Income Tax Officer Vill Chathiya Faizu, Shahpur, Baniyan (Exemption), Ward, Bareilly Faridpur, Bareilly Pan: Aabat8692F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Ms. Gurneet Kaur, Adv Revenue By: Sh. R.R.N. Shukla, Addl Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 24.11.2025 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac Dated 4.07.2024, Wherein The Ld. Cit(A) Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee Against The Order Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 16.04.2021. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under: - “1. Because, On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Has Erred In Fact & In Law In Confirming The Disallowance Made By Assessing Officer Rs. 60,20,000/- As Building Expenditure For Charitable Purposes, Arbitrarily Rejecting The Explanation Furnished By The Assessee. 2. Because, On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Has Erred In Fact & In Law That Such College Is Being Constructed & Run In The Remote Village Where In Due To Various Exigencies & Not Availability Of The Banking Facilities, Payments Are Made In Cash. 3. Because, On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Has Erred In Fact & In Law That The Payments Of Construction Had Made Not Being Rejected By The Ld. Ao. However, Due To Ongoing Work It Is A General Practice To Obtain Bills/Settlement Receipts Only On Finalization Of The Work, The Ld. Ao Has Arbitrarily Rejected The Same.
For Appellant: Ms. Gurneet Kaur, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. R.R.N. Shukla, Addl CIT DR
Section 143(3)
B’ BENCH, LUCKNOW
BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
A.Y. 2018-19
Thakur Roshan Singh, Smirti Sansthan, vs. Income Tax Officer
Vill Chathiya Faizu, Shahpur, Baniyan
(Exemption), Ward, Bareilly
Faridpur, Bareilly
PAN: AABAT8692F
(Appellant)
(Respondent)
Assessee by:
Ms. Gurneet Kaur, Adv
Revenue by:
Sh. R.R.N. Shukla, Addl CIT DR
Date of hearing:
04.11.2025
Date
