BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 271C(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka21Delhi17Mumbai12Ahmedabad8Bangalore8Jaipur8Kolkata5Hyderabad1Nagpur1SC1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 194J15Section 201(1)8Section 194H8Section 194C6Section 2506Section 2016Section 271C5Deduction5TDS5Section 133A

SDV INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-59 (TDS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed while the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 510/KOL/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Sept 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 271CSection 9(1)(vi)

section 194I of the Act. The Tribunal held that the 10 I.T.A. Nos. 708, 712 & 510/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2012-13 SDV International Logistics Pvt. Ltd. assessee, therefore was not liable to deduct tax at source u/s 194I of the Act and he could not be treated as the assessee in default u/s 201(1)/201(1

3
House Property3
Penalty3

ACIT, CIR-3(TDS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SDV INTERNATION LOGISTICS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed while the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 708/KOL/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Sept 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 271CSection 9(1)(vi)

section 194I of the Act. The Tribunal held that the 10 I.T.A. Nos. 708, 712 & 510/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2012-13 SDV International Logistics Pvt. Ltd. assessee, therefore was not liable to deduct tax at source u/s 194I of the Act and he could not be treated as the assessee in default u/s 201(1)/201(1

ACIT, CIR-3(TDS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SDV INTERNATION LOGISTICS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed while the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 712/KOL/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Sept 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 271CSection 9(1)(vi)

section 194I of the Act. The Tribunal held that the 10 I.T.A. Nos. 708, 712 & 510/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2012-13 SDV International Logistics Pvt. Ltd. assessee, therefore was not liable to deduct tax at source u/s 194I of the Act and he could not be treated as the assessee in default u/s 201(1)/201(1

N C SHAW AND CO BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS CIRCLE 2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1925/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271CSection 28

271C of the Act as the assessee had failed to make TDS in accordance with the provisions of Section 194H of the Act. Accordingly, the addition of Rs. 1,98,05,460/- is upheld. Consequently, these grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are dismissed.” 3.3. Aggrieved with the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal

N C SHAW AND CO BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RANGE-2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1947/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271CSection 28

271C of the Act as the assessee had failed to make TDS in accordance with the provisions of Section 194H of the Act. Accordingly, the addition of Rs. 1,98,05,460/- is upheld. Consequently, these grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are dismissed.” 3.3. Aggrieved with the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal