BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

57 results for “house property”+ Section 120(4)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi687Karnataka495Mumbai431Bangalore278Chandigarh106Hyderabad105Jaipur82Cochin61Kolkata57Chennai56Calcutta51Raipur49Telangana46Pune37Indore36Ahmedabad36Patna21Cuttack20Surat19Lucknow16Amritsar14SC11Rajasthan9Varanasi8Rajkot8Visakhapatnam6Guwahati5Nagpur5Orissa3Allahabad2Punjab & Haryana2Agra1Panaji1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)75Section 26343Section 143(2)21Addition to Income19Section 25017Transfer Pricing17Section 92C15Deduction14Section 144C(5)13

DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GANESH REALTY & MALL DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 581/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jan 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.581/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Singh, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri D.S. Damle, AR
Section 120(4)Section 131Section 143(3)Section 24Section 68

house property, but the utility charges of Rs.7,59,59,588/- received by the assessee from shop and office owners/tenants was taken as income from other sources.The Assessee had also taken various unsecured loans. During assessment proceedings,the assessee had submitted before the AO, the PAN of said creditors, copies of loan confirmations, extract of bank statement, copies of acknowledgement

Showing 1–20 of 57 · Page 1 of 3

Disallowance13
Section 249
Section 144C9

M/S. TEGA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1875/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Dec 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144C(5)Section 92BSection 92CSection 92C(3)

b) the purchase, sale, transfer, lease or use of intangible property, including the transfer of ownership or the provision of use of rights regarding land use, copyrights, patents, trademarks, licences, franchises, customer list, marketing channel, brand, commercial secret, know-how, industrial property right, exterior design or practical and new design or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature

M/S. EVEREADY INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT-4, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 805/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

120; (b) "record" [shall include and shall be deemed always to have included] all records relating to any proceeding under this Act available at the time of examination by the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner; (c) where any order referred to in this sub-section and passed by the Assessing Officer had been the subject matterof any appeal [filed

SMT. PRIYANKA GANGULY,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.(IT)-CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2619/KOL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad&Shri Anikesh Banerjee]

Section 143(3)Section 23Section 234BSection 234DSection 24Section 250

4 I.T.A. No.2619/Kol/2019 Assessment Years: 2016-17 Smt. Priyanka Ganguly which are related to argument and the relevant paragraphs are reproduced as below: “v. Disallowance of deduction claimed under section 24(b) of the ' Act amounting to INR 11,77,507, 30% standard deduction claimed under section 24(a), and proposition made to make Incorrect addition of coowner's income

VEERPRABHU AUTO PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CC - 2(4), KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1218/KOL/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jan 2026AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 250

120(4)(b), assuming he was, then for him to take charge as AO, there is necessary of an order u/s 127 for transfer of jurisdiction from DCIT to Addl CIT. The High Court heard the matter and allowed the appeal of the Revenue and sent the matter back to file of the Tribunal for adjudication of merits

OUTOTEC OYJ,KOLKATA vs. DDIT(IT)-2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 558/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Oct 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri K.M. Gupta, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 144C(5)

property for which a payment described in sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 3 of this Article is received; or (c) make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes, or consist of the development and transfer of a technical plan or technical design.” In our considered view, in order to be covered by the provisions of Article 13(4

OUTOTEC OYJ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 462/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Oct 2016AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri K.M. Gupta, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 144C(5)

property for which a payment described in sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 3 of this Article is received; or (c) make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes, or consist of the development and transfer of a technical plan or technical design.” In our considered view, in order to be covered by the provisions of Article 13(4

M/S MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 427/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, V.P & Shri S. S. Godara, Jm आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A No.427/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Mbl Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Dcit, Central Circle-2(2), Kolkata . 1St Floor, Divine Bliss, 2/3, Judges Court Road, Kolkata – 700027. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccm0564C (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Respondent By : Shri Ram Bilash Meena, Cit(Dr) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22/10/2020

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ram Bilash Meena, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 35DSection 80Section 80I

Housing Projects Ltd. 343 ITR 319 holds that such a course of action is not permissible in section 263 revision jurisdiction as under: “8. The Tribunal has set aside the order observing that the CIT had not held and come to the conclusion or given a finding that the actual receipt of consideration was more than what was declared

M/S. NOPANY & SONS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 56(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 1301/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 127Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 292B

house property without considering the facts that as per the said old agreement dt. 06.01.1975 between the assessee and the erstwhile owner M/s Murray & Co. Pvt. Ltd., duly authenticated and registered by a Notary, the assessee firm became the deemed owner of the property u/s 2(47)(v) of the I.Tax Act and accordingly the gain 1 loss on sale

ITO, WARD - 56(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. NOPANY & SONS, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 1621/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 127Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 292B

house property without considering the facts that as per the said old agreement dt. 06.01.1975 between the assessee and the erstwhile owner M/s Murray & Co. Pvt. Ltd., duly authenticated and registered by a Notary, the assessee firm became the deemed owner of the property u/s 2(47)(v) of the I.Tax Act and accordingly the gain 1 loss on sale

JCT LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2389/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jul 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S. Godara]

Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32(2)

House Property income was assessed in pursuance to Provisions of Section 23 and as such, the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 4, Kolkata is bad in law. 3 I.T.A. No. 84/Kol/2019 I.T.A. No. 2389/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2011-12 JCT Limited. 3. That the appellant craves leave to supplement, substitute, add, alter, amend, cancel or otherwise modify

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. JCT LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 84/KOL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jul 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S. Godara]

Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32(2)

House Property income was assessed in pursuance to Provisions of Section 23 and as such, the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 4, Kolkata is bad in law. 3 I.T.A. No. 84/Kol/2019 I.T.A. No. 2389/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2011-12 JCT Limited. 3. That the appellant craves leave to supplement, substitute, add, alter, amend, cancel or otherwise modify

SHREE GURU REALTORS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-10(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed as indicated above

ITA 1081/KOL/2015[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Feb 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap

Section 143(3)Section 150Section 24

house property. 4. (a) For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in giving a direction to the A.O. u/s. 150 for verification of share capital and share premium amount raised by the assessee in the relevant year though the same was not the subject matter of the instant appeal. (b

BENGAL SHRACHI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 5(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 251/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं.य/ Assessment Year:2017-18 बनाम Bengalshrachi Acit, Cir-5(1), Kolkata Housingdevelopment Aaykar Bhawan V/S. Ltd. P-7 Chowringhee Square, 686 Shrachi Tower, Kolkata-700 069. Anandapur,E.M Bypass, Kolkata-700 107. Pan: Aabcb2808F अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent ..

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2Section 2(22)Section 2(22)(e)Section 2(24)(x)Section 263

120; 92[(iii) an order under section 92CA by the Transfer Pricing Officer;] (b) "record" shall include and shall be deemed always to have included all records relating to any proceeding under this Act available at the time of examination by the Principal 93[Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal] Commissioner or Commissioner; (c) where any order referred

DCIT, CIRCLE - 7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. DHANUKA VENTURES PVT. LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1413/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1413/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dcit, Circle-7(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Dhanuka Ventures Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aabcm 7883 K] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri A. Bhattacharjee, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCA
Section 143(3)

120/- in its profit and loss account under the head ‘other expenses’. Out of this, he allowed Rs 25,00,298/- as business expenditure to be set off against other business income and disallowed Rs 92,98,822/- as the rental income earned by the assessee is to be taxed only as income from house property and not as business

THE TIMKEN COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. A.D.I.T (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - II,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 2139/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

property or information ITA No.387&398/Kol/2010&CO.31&32/Kol/2010 The Timken Company 11 referred to in Article 12(3), or (b) ‘make available’ technical knowledge, experience, skill know-how etc. It is not even Revenue’s case before us that the assessee’s case has anything to do with Article 12(3). The case of the Revenue therefore hinges

ADIT(IT)-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THE TIMKEN COMPANY, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 387/KOL/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2002-03

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

property or information ITA No.387&398/Kol/2010&CO.31&32/Kol/2010 The Timken Company 11 referred to in Article 12(3), or (b) ‘make available’ technical knowledge, experience, skill know-how etc. It is not even Revenue’s case before us that the assessee’s case has anything to do with Article 12(3). The case of the Revenue therefore hinges

THE TIMKEN COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. THE DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - 3(1),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 1268/KOL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

property or information ITA No.387&398/Kol/2010&CO.31&32/Kol/2010 The Timken Company 11 referred to in Article 12(3), or (b) ‘make available’ technical knowledge, experience, skill know-how etc. It is not even Revenue’s case before us that the assessee’s case has anything to do with Article 12(3). The case of the Revenue therefore hinges

PRATIK AGARWAL BENEFICIARY TRUST ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, C.C.-3(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee(s) are allowed as per the terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 2068/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 250

Section 68. If the Assessee is not able to provide a satisfactory explanation of the nature and source, of the investments made, it is open to the Revenue to hold that it is the income of the assessee, and there would be no further burden on the revenue to show that the income is from any particular source. Thereafter

PINKY AGARWAL ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CC-3(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee(s) are allowed as per the terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 984/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 250

Section 68. If the Assessee is not able to provide a satisfactory explanation of the nature and source, of the investments made, it is open to the Revenue to hold that it is the income of the assessee, and there would be no further burden on the revenue to show that the income is from any particular source. Thereafter