M/S. TEGA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the generation of steam for captive consumption does not qualify for deduction under Section 80-IA(4) as it pertains to electrical power generation and distribution. Interest under Sections 234A and 234B were directed to be recomputed.
What were the facts?
The assessee company filed its return of income for AY 2020-21. The appeal concerns adjustments made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Assessing Officer (AO) regarding corporate guarantee commission and the denial of deductions under Section 80G and 80-IA of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether corporate guarantee commission is an international transaction and if steam generation qualifies for deduction under Section 80-IA. The appeal also questioned the denial of deduction under Section 80G for CSR expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 92CA(3),Section 92B,Section 92C(3),Section 92C(2),Section 80G,Section 135(5),Section 80-IA(iv),Section 80-IA(4),Section 234A,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(17)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Everest Kento Cylinders Ltd.304 citing378 ITR 57 · 2015 · HC
- Distributors (Baroda) (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India229 citing155 ITR 120 · 1985 · SC
- JMS Mining (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT93 citing130 Taxmann.com 118 · 2021 · ITAT
- Distributor (Baroda) Private Limited v. Union of India35 citing22 Taxmann 49 · 1985 · SC
- Trib.) Goldman Sachs Services (P) Ltd. v. JCIT30 citing117 Taxmann.com 535 · 2020 · ITAT
- Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT20 citing350 ITR 94 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- West Cost Paper Mills (P.)\nLtd v. CIT19 citing52 Taxmann.com 268 · 2014 · ITAT
- PCIT v. Jay Chemicals Industries16 citing422 ITR 449 · 2020 · HC
- PCIT v. Jay Chemical Industries Ltd.15 citing120 Taxmann.com 315 · 2020 · HC
- SIAL SBEC Bioenergy Ltd. v. DCIT14 citing120 TTJ 711 · 2009 · ITAT
- FDC Ltd. v. PCIT8 citing161 Taxmann.com 393 · 2024 · ITAT
- Gujarat\nAlkalines and Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT8 citing20 Taxmann.com 764 · HC
- Cheil India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT6 citing169 Taxmann.com 507 · 2024 · HC
- No.18537 of 2009 319 ITR (st.) 8 (Mum-Trib.); (iv) SIAL SBEC Bioenergy Ltd. v. DCIT6 citing29 SOT 278 · 2009 · ITAT
- CIT v. Atul Ltd.4 citing74 Taxmann.com 255 · 2016 · HC
- DCIT v. Phillips Carbon Black Ltd.4 citing175 Taxmann.com 352 · 2025 · ITAT
- Gujarat Alkalines and Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT3 citing208 Taxmann 31 · 2012
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
order
: 11-December-2025 ORDER
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'AO') passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2020-21 dated 24.07.2024, which has been passed as per the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel-2, New Delhi u/s 144C(5) of the Act, dated 11.06.2024.
The assessee is in appeal raising the following grounds of appeal:
1. Order bad in law and on facts 1.1. That the assessment order passed by the Ld. Assessing Officer ('Ld. AO') under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) read with Section 1448 of the Act and read with the order passed by the Ld. Transfer Pricing Officer ('TPO'), 8.8.1 Transcript of the audio of the video recording: “Visual plus process explained video As you can see this is the fuel loading system that is happening. It is loading the fuel into the system. The boiler works on two inputs. One is the fuel which we have to burn to produce energy. The other one is water which will be converted into steam and will be supplied. So what you see here is the fuel loading system. The fuel is loaded from the tanker and into the fuel tanks. From there the fuel will move to the boiler. This section is where water treatment is happening.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026