BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai87Delhi69Ahmedabad31Chennai15Kolkata13Bangalore7Surat6Indore6Dehradun4Karnataka3Jaipur2Chandigarh2Kerala1Rajkot1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 80I35Section 143(3)15Section 10B15Section 26314Deduction12Section 80H10Section 809Addition to Income7Section 10B(1)6Section 108

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOODCARE PHARMA PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2485/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80I

section 80I(10) and 80IC(7) and also proposed to disallow 90% of the advertisement expenses. The assessee by his letter

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOODCARE PHARMA PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2486/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2019
6
Disallowance5
Business Income3
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80I

section 80I(10) and 80IC(7) and also proposed to disallow 90% of the advertisement expenses. The assessee by his letter

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S AMRICON AGROVAT PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result the appeal by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2300/KOL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon'Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Hon'Ble Sri Waseem Ahmed, Am] Assessment Year : 2013-14 A.C.I.T., Central Circle-2(1) -Vs- M/S. Amricon Agrovat (P).Ltd., Kolkata Kolkata (Pan Aadca 1610 Q) (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant: Shri.S.Dasgupta Addl.Cit Dr For The Respondent: Shri D.S.Damle, Fca Date Of Hearing : 15.2.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.03.2018. Order Per Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against Order Dated 27.9.2016 Of Cit(A)-20, Kolkata, Relating To Ay 2013-14. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Revenue In This Reads As Follows: “(I) That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Accepting That The Term 'Manufacture' Occurring In The Context Of Section 80-Ib Does Not Necessarily Require That The End Product Of The Manufacturing Process Is To Be Completely Different From The Ingredients, As Regards Its Chemical Composition, Integral Structure Or Its Use. (Ii) That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Accepting That The Process Of Manufacturing Of Poultry Feeds Does Not Amount To Mere Mixing Together Of All Different Ingredients, Without Involving Any Change In The Chemical Composition Of The Ingredients. (Iii) That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Accepting That The Process Of Preparation Of Poultry Feeds Amount To Production Of An Article Within The Meaning Of Section 80Ib. (Iv) That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Allowing The Entire Amount Of Rs.1,12,50,626/- Claimed As Deduction U/S 80-Ib.

For Appellant: Shri.S.Dasgupta Addl.CIT DRFor Respondent: Shri D.S.Damle, FCA
Section 14ASection 80Section 801B(4)Section 80I

80I and Sec 80IB are parameteria because conditions for part of deduction are same and therefore the said decision is equally applicable in the present case. ITA No.2300/Kol/2016 M/s. Amricon Agrovat Pvt.Ltd. A.Y.2013-14 5 17. Section 80IB is an incentive provision of the Income Tax Act enacted, by the Legislature to promote economic and industrial growth in backward districts

M/S. TEGA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1875/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Dec 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144C(5)Section 92BSection 92CSection 92C(3)

80I-A claimed by the appellant as indicated in the preceding discussion." 16. The Tribunal, concurred with the aforesaid findings recorded by the CIT (A), by taking support of the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of the ITAT, Mumbai, in the case of West Cost Paper Mills (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, [2014] 52 taxmann.com 268. As regards section 80IA

M/S. K KALPANA INFRASTRUCTURES LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, CENTRAL - 1, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 814/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S.Godaraassessment Year:2013-14

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80

disallow section 80IB deduction on export subsidy received by the assessee company. 5. In view of ,my above decision, the assessment order u/s. 143(3) dated 22/03/2016 is set aside and restored to the file of the AO to the extent of examining the issue relating to allowing deduction u/s. 80IB on interest income of Rs.3

ACIT, CIRCLE - 41, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ANMOL TEXTILES,, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2031/KOL/2014[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Apr 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 2031/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Acit, Circle-41, Kolkata -Vs- M/S Anmol Textiles [Pan: Aadfn 4059 K] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P.K. Srihari, CITFor Respondent: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate
Section 10BSection 133ASection 14Section 143(3)Section 80ISection 9

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 10B of the Act in the sum of Rs 7,26,56,048/- and completed the assessment. 4. The ld CITA granted deduction u/s 10B of the Act by observing as under:- “I have examined the submissions made by the Ld. AR , the findings of the AO in the assessment order, perused the facts

M/S. PDP STEELS LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 3(3), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1883/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 80I

section 80I, 80IA etc. and excluded only the net interest income from such deduction, so he prayed that benefit of netting should be given to assessee. 4. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, we are not repeating the same again for the sake of brevity. We note that in the revenue appeal for the same assessment year

M/S. PDP STEELS LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 3(3), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2155/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 80I

section 80I, 80IA etc. and excluded only the net interest income from such deduction, so he prayed that benefit of netting should be given to assessee. 4. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, we are not repeating the same again for the sake of brevity. We note that in the revenue appeal for the same assessment year

STAR PAPER MILLS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 127/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri P. M .Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80ISection 92B

80I-A(8) of the Act, is not subject to provisions of Chapter X of the Act or that it is not to be subjected to arm’s length principles. He took us through the Form 3CEB wherein the assessee had determined the ALP of the power supplied by the CPP, by using the CUP Method. He also referred

DCIT, CIR-10(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S YAMAI FASHION PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeals are dismissed as involving lower than the prescribed tax effect of ₹20 lac therefore

ITA 61/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 10Section 108Section 10BSection 10B(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 801BSection 80HSection 80l

Disallowance of other income while computing the deduction u/s 10B of the Act. Ground nos. 1 and 2 of revenue appeal The brief facts of this issue is that the assessee is having a 100% EOU at Viramgram. The assessee company claimed deduction u/s 10B of the Act to the tune

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. YAMAI FASHION PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeals are dismissed as involving lower than the prescribed tax effect of ₹20 lac therefore

ITA 1830/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 10Section 108Section 10BSection 10B(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 801BSection 80HSection 80l

Disallowance of other income while computing the deduction u/s 10B of the Act. Ground nos. 1 and 2 of revenue appeal The brief facts of this issue is that the assessee is having a 100% EOU at Viramgram. The assessee company claimed deduction u/s 10B of the Act to the tune

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. YAMAI FASHION PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeals are dismissed as involving lower than the prescribed tax effect of ₹20 lac therefore

ITA 1831/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 10Section 108Section 10BSection 10B(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 801BSection 80HSection 80l

Disallowance of other income while computing the deduction u/s 10B of the Act. Ground nos. 1 and 2 of revenue appeal The brief facts of this issue is that the assessee is having a 100% EOU at Viramgram. The assessee company claimed deduction u/s 10B of the Act to the tune

M/S MERLINS,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CILCLE-31, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1999/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jun 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz)] [Through Virtual Court] I.T.A. No. 1999/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Merlins......................................…………………………..................................................Appellant 22, Prince Anwar Shah Road, Kolkata – 700 033. [Pan: Aatfm 9672 P] Vs Acit, Circle – 31, Kolkata...................…………………………………………………..............Respondent Kolkata. Appearances By: Shri Rakesh Jain, Ar Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Jayanta Khanra, Jcit, Sr. Dr Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : May 13, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 23, 2021 Order

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 80H

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D Rs. 2,25,121/-.” 3. Against the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3)/147 of the Act, an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) challenging the validity of the assessment made by the AO as well as disputing both the additions made on merit. During