BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,225 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,652Delhi4,487Bangalore1,559Chennai1,460Ahmedabad1,254Kolkata1,225Pune878Hyderabad708Jaipur698Indore488Chandigarh482Cochin378Surat306Karnataka263Raipur212Visakhapatnam201Rajkot194Cuttack161Amritsar134Nagpur133Lucknow132Guwahati109Panaji88Jodhpur71Calcutta58Telangana56Patna49Ranchi48Allahabad45Dehradun44Agra43SC36Varanasi28Jabalpur27Kerala16Punjab & Haryana13Himachal Pradesh4Rajasthan3Orissa2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)82Disallowance61Section 14A56Deduction47Addition to Income45Section 80I38Section 143(1)37Section 139(1)35Section 14730Section 250

SENBO ENGINEERING LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-11, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

ITA 1377/KOL/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Sept 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Years: 2007-08 Senbo Engineering Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of 87, Lenin Sarani, Vs Income Tax, Circle-11, Kolkata - 700013 Kolkata - 700013 (Pan: Aadcs6138B) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S. Bhattacharya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80I

80-IB inserted by the Finance Act, 2007 w.r.e.f. 01.04.2000. Several other disallowances were also made and the income was computed at Rs.6,21,42,200/- after disallowing the claim of deduction under section

D.C.I.T CC - XXVIII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SPML INFRA LTD (ERSTWHILE M/S SUBHAS PROJECTS& MARKETING LTD), KOLKATA

Showing 1–20 of 1,225 · Page 1 of 62

...
29
Section 115J27
Limitation/Time-bar13

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1291/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 80Section 80l

section 80-IA . These set of facts have not been disputed by the AO. The Ld. AO disallowed the claim

M/S. TEGA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1875/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Dec 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144C(5)Section 92BSection 92CSection 92C(3)

Disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80-IA of the Act 5.1 That on the facts and in the circumstances

RATULIA SAMABAY KRISHI UNNYAN SAMITI LTD.,EAST MEDINIPUR vs. I.T.O., WARD - 27(3), HALDIA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2409/KOL/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Aug 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal & ShilpiFor Respondent: Shri Somnath Das Biswas, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 139Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under sections 10AA, 80-IA, 80-1AB, 80-IB, 80-IC, 80-ID or section

KHANDRA COLLIERY EMPLOYEES CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,BARDHAMAN vs. THE AO, CPC BANGALORE / ITO, WARD-1(1), BURDWAN, BURDWAN

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2594/KOL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A), Where Also He Could Not Succeed.

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 234FSection 250Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of deduction claimed under sections 10AA, 80-IA, 80-1AB, 80-IB, 80-IC, 80-ID or section

DURGAMONDAP SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYN SAMATI LTD. ,ITO, WARD NO-49(1), KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD NO- 49(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1153/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Pradip Kumar Choubey & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under sections 10AA, 80-IA, 80-1AB, 80-IB, 80-IC, 80-ID or section

PAHALAMPUR SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITY LTD., ,HOOGHLY vs. ITO, WARD 23(1), , HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 887/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Sept 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Pahalampur Samabay Krishi Ito, Ward-23(1), Hooghly Unnayan Ltd.

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. B. Chakraborthy, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 148Section 153ASection 80Section 80P

80-ID or section 80IE], no such deduction shall be allowed to him unless he furnishes a return of his income for such assessment year on or before the due date specified under sub-section (1) of section 139." ******************* "143(1) Where a return has been made under section 139, or in response to a notice under sub-section

DCIT,CIRCLE-8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. R.D. ESTATES & RESOURCES LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed as not pressed

ITA 1343/KOL/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 May 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: : Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri K.K Chaparia, FCA, ld.ARFor Respondent: none appeared
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 80I

disallowed the deduction u/s 80IB(10) by observing as follows: The submission of the A/R is considered but found not tenable. The primary contention of the assessee that the amendment in section 80IB( 10) has been bought about by the Finance (No.2) Act 2004 and is therefore not applicable to the relevant FY 2004-05. The assessee has further stated

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 2777/KOL/2013[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2017AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2007-08

Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80I

Section 80IA of the Act till the disposal of writ petition. However, the AO observed that no further details was submitted by the assessee Hence, AO disallowed the deduction claim u/s 80

DCIT, CIR-4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SUBLIME AGRO LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue, is dismissed

ITA 146/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.146/Kol/2016 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11 Dcit, Cir-4(2), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Sublime Agro Limited 7/1, Lord Sinha Road, Room 4Th Floor, Room No.11B, Aayakar No.201-203, Kolkata – 700 Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee 071. Square, Kolkata – 700 069. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaecs 1804 P (Assessee) .. (Respondent) Assessee By :Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. Cit(Dr) Respondent By:Shri J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. & Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 05/12/2017 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31/01/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Revenue, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2010-11, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)–2, Kolkata, In Appeal No.102/Cit(A)-2/2014-15, Dated 12.11.2015, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961, (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’), Dated 19.03.2013. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Allowing The Deduction U/S 80Ie To The Sum Of Rs.2,14,72,852/-. When The Assessee Co. Had Not Satisfied The Condition Laid Down In The Act For Such Allowance. 2. Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred Is Not Verifying The Assessee’S Mere Submission & Ignoring Altogether The Ao’S Conclusion That The Assessee’S Claim Was Not Eligible For Such Deduction. 3. The Revenue Shall Crave To Add Or Alter Any Other Ground On Or Before The Date Of Hearing.”

For Appellant: Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. & Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv
Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80I

section 80-IE of the I.T. Act. Before the ld CIT(A), the assessee filed confirmation/evidences [in form of Annexure 6 to 11] in support of claim that the new Plant & Machineries were indeed ‘put to use’ M/s. Sublime Agro Limited Assessment Year: 2010-11 in the relevant financial year. The Assessee stated that he could not get opportunity

DCIT, CIRCLE-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Ground No. 1 of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 140/KOL/2015[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Oct 2017AY 2005-2006

Bench: Sri N.V. Vasudevan & Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy]

Section 250Section 80Section 80ISection 91

section 80-IA . These set of facts have not been disputed by the AO. The Ld. AO disallowed the claim

DCIT, CIRCLE-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Ground No. 1 of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 141/KOL/2015[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Oct 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Sri N.V. Vasudevan & Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy]

Section 250Section 80Section 80ISection 91

section 80-IA . These set of facts have not been disputed by the AO. The Ld. AO disallowed the claim

M/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE - 12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result Ground no. 1 & 3 of the revenue are allowed in part

ITA 1573/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara) Assessment Year: 2011-12 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd…….............................................................……………………..Appellant 27, Shakespeare Sarani Kolkata – 700 017 [Pan : Aaecs 0765 R] Vs. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-12 Kolkata……...............................…….…..Respondent Assessment Year: 2011-12 Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 80

Section 80IA of the Act till the disposal of writ petition. However, the AO observed that no further details was submitted by the assessee Hence, AO disallowed the deduction claim u/s 80

ACIT, CIRCLE-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result Ground no. 1 & 3 of the revenue are allowed in part

ITA 1765/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara) Assessment Year: 2011-12 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd…….............................................................……………………..Appellant 27, Shakespeare Sarani Kolkata – 700 017 [Pan : Aaecs 0765 R] Vs. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-12 Kolkata……...............................…….…..Respondent Assessment Year: 2011-12 Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 80

Section 80IA of the Act till the disposal of writ petition. However, the AO observed that no further details was submitted by the assessee Hence, AO disallowed the deduction claim u/s 80

M/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE - 12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result Ground no. 1 & 3 of the revenue are allowed in part

ITA 1572/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara) Assessment Year: 2011-12 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd…….............................................................……………………..Appellant 27, Shakespeare Sarani Kolkata – 700 017 [Pan : Aaecs 0765 R] Vs. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-12 Kolkata……...............................…….…..Respondent Assessment Year: 2011-12 Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 80

Section 80IA of the Act till the disposal of writ petition. However, the AO observed that no further details was submitted by the assessee Hence, AO disallowed the deduction claim u/s 80

ACIT, CIRCLE-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result Ground no. 1 & 3 of the revenue are allowed in part

ITA 1764/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Mar 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara) Assessment Year: 2011-12 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd…….............................................................……………………..Appellant 27, Shakespeare Sarani Kolkata – 700 017 [Pan : Aaecs 0765 R] Vs. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-12 Kolkata……...............................…….…..Respondent Assessment Year: 2011-12 Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 80

Section 80IA of the Act till the disposal of writ petition. However, the AO observed that no further details was submitted by the assessee Hence, AO disallowed the deduction claim u/s 80

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. TM INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of revenue are dismissed and cross objections of the assessee are allowed in part

ITA 1513/KOL/2008[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Oct 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Jm]

For Respondent: Shri R. K. Kureel, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 80Section 80I

disallowance of claim under section 80-IA of the Act, expenses for repairs and maintenance of building, on account of 14A of the Act, disallowance

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. TM INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of revenue are dismissed and cross objections of the assessee are allowed in part

ITA 1914/KOL/2008[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Oct 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Jm]

For Respondent: Shri R. K. Kureel, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 80Section 80I

disallowance of claim under section 80-IA of the Act, expenses for repairs and maintenance of building, on account of 14A of the Act, disallowance

ITO, WD-33(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SOMDATT BUILDERS SIMPLEX JV, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 285/KOL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Oct 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.285, 286, 287 & 288/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2007-08) Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S Somdatt Builders Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10-B, Simplex Jv, 12/1, Neelie Middleton Row, 3Rd Floor, Sengupta Sarani, Kolkata- Kolkata-700071 87 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabas 9777 J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 80

disallowed the deduction under section 80-IA of the Act in view of the Explanation to such section introduced by the Finance

ITO, WD-33(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SOMDATT BUILDERS SIMPLEX JV, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 286/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Oct 2016AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.285, 286, 287 & 288/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2007-08) Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S Somdatt Builders Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10-B, Simplex Jv, 12/1, Neelie Middleton Row, 3Rd Floor, Sengupta Sarani, Kolkata- Kolkata-700071 87 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabas 9777 J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 80

disallowed the deduction under section 80-IA of the Act in view of the Explanation to such section introduced by the Finance