BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

88 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 250(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka427Mumbai384Delhi227Bangalore139Chennai119Pune91Kolkata88Hyderabad85Ahmedabad80Jaipur70Chandigarh54Amritsar50Cochin45Rajkot21Visakhapatnam20Indore19Agra18Nagpur18Patna17Allahabad17Calcutta16Surat15Raipur13Lucknow13Jodhpur9Cuttack9Panaji5Jabalpur4Guwahati4Telangana4Ranchi3Varanasi3Rajasthan3Dehradun2SC1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 11112Section 143(1)103Section 25088Section 12A86Exemption67Charitable Trust44Section 1043Addition to Income42Section 80G36

M/S. CALCUTTA CRICKET & FOOTBALL CLUB,KOLKATA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, WARD 1(1). KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 499/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble) [Virtual Court Hearing] M/S. Calcutta Cricket & Football Club......................................................................……....….....Appellant 10B, Middleton Row Kolkata – 700 071 [Pan : Aaccc 6337 P] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Exemption – Ward(1), Kolkata…………….....................….…....…… Respondent Appearances By: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Advocate & Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Supriyo Pal, Addl. Cit D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 13Th, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 5Th, 2021 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(2)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’), dt. 27/12/2018, for the Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The sole issue that arises for our consideration is the manner in which the amount is calculated for accumulation u/s 11(1)(a) of the Act. The assessee calculated 15% of the gross income for being accumulated or set apart for application

Showing 1–20 of 88 · Page 1 of 5

Deduction32
Disallowance29
Section 143(3)26

JERMELS ACCADEMY,DARJEELING vs. ITO, WARD 2(2), EXEMP,, SILIGURI

In the result, all the 3 appeals filed by the Assessee are partly

ITA 2748/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 12A(1)(ba)Section 12A(2)Section 139Section 144Section 2(15)Section 250

250 was passed on 31.07.2023. Thus, it is clear that the Provisional Registration under section 12 A(1)(ac)(vi) was received on a date, which was subsequent to passing of assessment order under section 144 i.e. after 28.12. 2019; therefore the second proviso to section 12A(2) is not applicable in the instant case. Therefore

M/S. M. K. SHAH EXPORTS LTD,,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appealof the Revenue (ITA No

ITA 1903/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1903/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) M/S. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Vs. A.C.I.T, Circle-4(1), Kolkata P-7, Chowringhee Square, 8Th Floor, 2/2. Justice Dwarkanath Road, Kolkata – 700 020. Kolkata – 700 069. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaccm 0884 H (Assessee) .. (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1974/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) M/S. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. A.C.I.T, Circle-4(1), Kolkata Vs. P-7, Chowringhee Square, 8Th Floor, 2/2. Justice Dwarkanath Road, Kolkata – 700 069. Kolkata – 700 020. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaccm 0884 H (Assessee) .. (Respondent) Assessee By :Shri S. Jhajharia, Ar Revenue By :Shrisaurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit (Sr. Dr) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 23/08/2018 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2018

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, ARFor Respondent: ShriSaurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 37Section 80GSection 92C

Charitable Trust ( institution) has become taxable for any technical reason and also the Ld. AO did not mention that the certificate issued under section 80G(5)(v) has been cancelled by the Income Tax Department. Under these circumstances the deduction under section 80G of the Act cannot be denied to the assessee company.We also note that subsequent to the donation

ACIT, CIRCLE - 4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. M.K. SHAH EXPORTS LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, the appealof the Revenue (ITA No

ITA 1974/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1903/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) M/S. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. Vs. A.C.I.T, Circle-4(1), Kolkata P-7, Chowringhee Square, 8Th Floor, 2/2. Justice Dwarkanath Road, Kolkata – 700 020. Kolkata – 700 069. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaccm 0884 H (Assessee) .. (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1974/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) M/S. M. K. Shah Exports Ltd. A.C.I.T, Circle-4(1), Kolkata Vs. P-7, Chowringhee Square, 8Th Floor, 2/2. Justice Dwarkanath Road, Kolkata – 700 069. Kolkata – 700 020. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Aaccm 0884 H (Assessee) .. (Respondent) Assessee By :Shri S. Jhajharia, Ar Revenue By :Shrisaurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit (Sr. Dr) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 23/08/2018 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2018

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, ARFor Respondent: ShriSaurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 37Section 80GSection 92C

Charitable Trust ( institution) has become taxable for any technical reason and also the Ld. AO did not mention that the certificate issued under section 80G(5)(v) has been cancelled by the Income Tax Department. Under these circumstances the deduction under section 80G of the Act cannot be denied to the assessee company.We also note that subsequent to the donation

OM SHANTI CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. AO WARD NO 1(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1532/KOL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Oct 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Prakhar Dhoot, AR (online)For Respondent: Susanta Saha, Sr. DR
Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 250

Charitable Trust, Kolkata AY: 2019-20 2. The Learned CIT Appeal has erred in disallowing the claim of exemption of Rs. 797367/- on ground that the trust has not furnished the details of Registration u/s 12A/12AA. Hence the exemption is not allowed. 3. The Learned CIT Appeal did not provide the opportunity to provide the Registration detail of the trust

M/S. SETH B D GOYAL CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O. WARD - 1(3), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2267/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Apr 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2020-21dated 24.09.2024, which has been passed against the intimation order u/s 143(1) of the Act, dated 30.11.2021. I.T.A. No.: 2267/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2020-21 M/s. Seth B D Goyal Charitable Trust. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising

BASTUHARA SAHAYATA SAMITI,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 1(2)(EXEMPTION),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 444/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 444/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2016-2017 Bastuhara Sahayata Samiti,……………….…Appellant 27/1B, Bidhan Sarani, Srimini Market, Kolkata-700006, West Bengal [Pan:Aaatb7422R] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………………………..Respondent Ward-1(2), (Exemption), Kolkata, Office Of The Income Tax Officer, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700071 Appearances By: Shri S.K. Tulsian, Advocate & Ms. Puja Somani, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Somnath Das Biswas, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: May 20, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: July 28, 2025 O R D E R

Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

250 of the Act were not sent at the address specifically requested for in the Appeal Form-35 itself and the Ld. CIT(A) has decided the case ex parte qua the appellant. Therefore, the evidences already produced /filed before the dl. AO and which are also filed with this submission in the paper book may kindly be admitted

SURAJ DEVI MOHTA CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. DIT-EXEMPTION, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 2023/KOL/2014[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Sept 2017

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2023/Kol/2014 Suraj Devi Mohta Charitable Vs. D.I.T.(Exemption), Kolkata Trust 10B, Middleton Row, 6Th 7, Lyons Range, 2Nd Floor, Room Floor, Kolkata – 700 071. No.4C, Kolkata – 700 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaets3384 F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellantby :Shri P. J. Bhide, Fca Respondent By :Shri G. Hangshing, Cit(Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 06/09/2017 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/09/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Is Directed Against An Order Passed By The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata Dated 06.08.2014. 2.This Appeal Is Time-Barred By 21 Days. The Assessee Moved An Application For Condonation Of Delay In Filing The Appeal. Having Heard The Petition Of Condonation Of Delay, We Find That There Was Sufficient Reason For Not Filing The Appeal Within The Time Limit, Before The Itat. Therefore, We Condone The Delay & Admit The Appeal For Hearing. 3. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Under: “1.That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Director Of Income Tax(Exemption), Kolkata Erred In Rejecting The Application For Renewal Of Exemption U/S 80G(5)(Vi) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 On The Ground That The Loan Given To Mrs. Shrutimohta, Wife Of One Of The Trustees, Shri

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Bhide, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G. Hangshing, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 13Section 13(2)(a)Section 80G(5)(vi)

250 per month. It was submitted that it is a big bungalow at an important hill station and, therefore, the rent stipulated must be deemed to be inadequate. The Tribunal, however, pointed out that this property was donated by Sir PadampatSinghania in the ‘‘previous year'' relevant to the asst. yr. 1971-72 and its value, as per the balance-sheet

M/S. SETH CHAGAN MALL HIRA LALL DUGAR CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1358/KOL/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Oct 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubey

Section 11(2)(ii)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)- 6, Chennai [in short ld. ‘CIT(A)’] dated 12.06.2024 arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 05.06.2020. 1.1. The brief facts of the case of the appellant are that the assessee is a registered Trust

ITO(EXEMPTION),WARD-1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SURESH AMIYA MEMORIAL TRUST, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 652/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Kaustav Chakraborty &For Respondent: Shri Arup Chatterjee, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 44A

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2020-21 dated 30.01.2024, which has been filed against the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by Revenue are reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Id. CIT(A) has erred

M/S S.KANEHIALALL LOHIA TRUST,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD-1(4), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 814/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 142(1)

section the income which is to be taken for purpose of accumulation is the income derived by the trust from property. If both the decisions are carefully read, it becomes evident that any expenditure which is in the shape of application of income is not to be taken into account. Having found that trust is entitled to exemption under

M/S S.KANEHIALALL LOHIA TRUST,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD-1(4), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 813/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 142(1)

section the income which is to be taken for purpose of accumulation is the income derived by the trust from property. If both the decisions are carefully read, it becomes evident that any expenditure which is in the shape of application of income is not to be taken into account. Having found that trust is entitled to exemption under

KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 50,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 724/KOL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Aug 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 723 & 724/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- C.I.T.-Xvii, Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A Nos. 523 & 524/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- J.C.I.T., Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel Of Assessee For The Respondent : Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Date Of Hearing : 09.08.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2017

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel of AssesseeFor Respondent: Shri Anand R. Baiwar, CIT
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 263

6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that the short point that arises for our consideration in the first part of the additional ground is as to whether the assessee would be entitled for exemption u/s 11 and 12 of the Act for the Asst Year 2006-07 in view

KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 50,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 723/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Aug 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 723 & 724/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- C.I.T.-Xvii, Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A Nos. 523 & 524/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- J.C.I.T., Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel Of Assessee For The Respondent : Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Date Of Hearing : 09.08.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2017

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel of AssesseeFor Respondent: Shri Anand R. Baiwar, CIT
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 263

6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that the short point that arises for our consideration in the first part of the additional ground is as to whether the assessee would be entitled for exemption u/s 11 and 12 of the Act for the Asst Year 2006-07 in view

M/S. MUNNILAL & DHURIDEVI BAID CHARITABLE TRUST ,KOLKATA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(4), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1500/KOL/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2018AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice -] I.T.A. No. 1500/Kol/2018 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Munnilal & Dhuridevi Baid Chritable Trust.............................…………………Appellant 4, Ho Chi Minh Sarani, 2Nd Floor, Suit No. 2F, Jeevan Deep, Kolkata – 700 071. [Pan : Aaatm 7374 D] Ito (Exemption) Ward 1(4), Kolkata...................……………………………………....Respondent 10B, Middleton Row, 6Th Floor, Kolkata – 700 071. Appearances By: Shri Rajesh Kumar Duggar, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Alok Nag, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 23, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 31, 2018 Order This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit (Appeals) – 25, Kolkata Dated 27.04.2018 & The Grounds Raised Therein By The Assessee Read As Under: “1. For That The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Law & Facts Allowing The Appeal Statistically ‘Since He Gave The Direction To The Ao To Verify The Claim Of The Appellant As Per Provisions Of Section 11 Of The Act’ Without Paying Attention To The Fact That The Order Appealed Has Been Passed Under Section 143(1) Of The Act & The Provisions Of Section 250(6) Of The Act. 2. For That The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Law & Facts Allowing The Appeal Statistically ‘Since He Gave The Direction To The Ao To Verify The Claim Of The Appellant As Per Provisions Of Section 11 Of The Act’ Not Appreciating The Provisions Of Section 143(1) Of The Act Though Adjustments Mentioned In The Said Section Do Not Cover The Adjustment Made, Further Before Proceeding To The Said Adjustment Proviso To Section 143(1) Requiring Intimation To Be Given To Appellant Was Not Complied.”

Section 11Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(15)Section 250(6)Section 80

250(6) of the Act. 2. For that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and facts allowing the appeal statistically ‘since he gave the direction to the AO to verify the claim of the appellant as per provisions of section 11 of the Act’ not appreciating the provisions of section 143(1) of the Act though adjustments mentioned

ACIT, KOLKATA vs. BANDHAN KONNAGAR, HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1593/KOL/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80G

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. 2. The revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal for AY 2014-15: “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the findings of the AO to effect that the administrative

ITO(EXEMPT),WARD-1(2). , KOLKATA vs. DEBENDRA AND ROHINI MEMORIAL TRUST, PURBA MEDINIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 241/KOL/2023[2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.241/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-21 Ito (Exemption), Ward-1(2), Kolkata...…......................……...…..….. Appellant Vs. Debendra & Rohini Memorial Trust............….……….…………….. Respondent Kalyanpur Barida, Egra Medinipur, Purba-721429, W.B-721429. [Pan: Aactd0883C] Appearances By: Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Miraj D. Shah, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : May 18, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 27, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 02.01.2023 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 12A(1)(ba)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). 2. The revenue in this appeal has taken the following grounds of appeal: “1. Whether from the facts and circumstances of the case Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi has erred in facts by holding that assessee was entitled for exemption despite its failure to file return of income

ITO(EXMP), WD -2(1), DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR vs. M/S GURUKUL EDUCATION INSTITUTE, DURGAPUR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1369/KOL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, V.P & Shri S. S. Godara, Jm आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A No.1369/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Ito (Exemptions), Ward-2(1), Vs. M/S. Gurukul Educational Institute Durgapur G.T. Road, Rajbandh, Durgapur-713212. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatg7615B (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Sr. Dr Respondent By : Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Anupam Kr. Dey, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 09/12/2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara: This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2010-11 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-Durgapur’S Order Dated 28.03.2016 Passed In Case No.90/Cit(A)/Dgp/2013-14 Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused.

For Appellant: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Anikesh Banerjee, & Shri Anupam Kr. Dey, Advocate
Section 11Section 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(3)Section 250(4)Section 40A(2)

250(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in contravention to Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. C.I.T.(A) has erred in granting relief without examining violation of Section 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for providing interest free loan to a related party

SRI S L DUGAR CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 1(3), EXEMPT, , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1006/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 250

250 of the Act to the assessee to file copies of registration u/s 12AB of the Act. Since no response was received from the assessee hence on failure to produce the registration certificate, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has filed the appeal before

NANDLAL SHARMA CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, both these appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 357/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Sept 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kr. Agarwala, CIT, D/R
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250

250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’), dt. 29/04/2022, for the Assessment Year 2018- 19 and Assessment Year 2019-20; respectively. 2. We first take up ITA No. 356/Kol/2023 for adjudication. 3. Though the assessee has raised various grounds of appeal but the sole grievance of the assessee is that the CPC erred in not giving