BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai166Delhi95Jaipur32Bangalore20Chennai20Ahmedabad13Indore9Hyderabad9Cuttack7Chandigarh7Pune5Guwahati5Visakhapatnam4Cochin4Jodhpur4Lucknow4Raipur3Kolkata2Rajkot1Surat1

NARAYAN SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 6(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1077/KOL/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Sept 2025AY 2011-2012
Section 10(38)

section 269 of the I.T. Act says the definition of High Court.\nIn this chapter High Court means:\n(i) in relation to any State, the High Court for that State;\n(ii) in relation to the Union Territory of Delhi, the High Court of Delhi;\na)*\n(iii)****\n(iv) in relation to the Union Territory of the Andaman

RAJNEE DONG,SILIGURI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICIER, WARD THREE, DARJEELING

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1065/KOL/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm & Shri Sanjay Awasthi, Am Rajnee Dong Income Tax Officer Grace Arjun Homes, Salabari, Ward Three, Darjeeling, Near Monestry Road, Darjiling-734101, Vs. Siliguri-734002, West Bengal West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Ajipd2993C Assessee By : Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Ar Revenue By : Ms. Monalisha Pal Mukherjee, Dr Date Of Hearing: 30.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Ms. Monalisha Pal Mukherjee, DR
Section 148

sections 142(1) and 143(2) of the Act were issued calling for further details and explanations in connection with the income returned. However, the assessee failed to properly comply with the same. On the basis of information available on record, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment and determined the total income at Rajnee Dong