BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 16Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi54Mumbai51Nagpur15Hyderabad14Jaipur9Kolkata8Pune7Bangalore5Cochin3Amritsar3Jodhpur3Ahmedabad2Chandigarh2Chennai2Lucknow2Raipur2Patna1Cuttack1Visakhapatnam1Rajkot1Surat1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 14A9Section 50C7Addition to Income7Section 143(3)6Section 2504Disallowance4Section 143(1)3Depreciation3Section 1942TDS

DCIT, CC-1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. A R SULPHONATES PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 570/KOL/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Mar 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Rajeeva Kumar, Advocate & ShriFor Respondent: Shri B. K. Singh, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 50C

16A of that Act. [Explanation 1.]—For the purposes of this section, “Valuation Officer” shall have the same meaning as in clause (r) of section 2 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (27 of 1957). [Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this section, the expression “assessable” means the price which the stamp valuation authority would have, notwithstanding anything

MANICK CHANDRA PAUL,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 8(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

2
Capital Gains2
ITA 614/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Das, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(47)Section 250Section 55ASection 80

gains as per his requirement. In the original computation of income, the assessee adopted the FMV at Rs.6,42,700/- against the value mentioned in the sale deed at Rs.27,00,000/-. Once the provisions of sec. 50C were adopted, the assessee immediately enhanced the FMV placing a valuation report to suit his requirement. In view of the above

SHRI SANTANU SANYAL,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 2(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 41/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Pradip Kumar Choubey

Section 144Section 250

16A issued by Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.] 2.1. Ld. CIT(A) in the appeal has taken the issue ground-wise and in his judgement dismissed the grounds of the appellant that the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as ld. 'AO') erred in law and in facts in assessing the income of the appellant

AIROVIENT FANS & SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 638/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 133(6)Section 194Section 194CSection 37(1)

capital gain’. At the assessment stage, a disallowance of Rs. 2,59,97,824/- was made u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the 'Act') on the finding that the assessee had failed to submit documentary evidences to confirm the genuineness of expenditure booked. It is recorded by the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred

INDIAN COAL AGENCY,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-35, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 868/KOL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sonjoy Sarma & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 14A

capital of its own (Rs.148,27,74,222/-) as against investment of only Rs.43,45,97,241/- and hence the presumption taken by the Ld. PCIT for such direction for disallowance towards interest is bad in law and it may be held accordingly. 4. Without prejudice to Grounds No. 2 & 3 above, the Ld. PCIT erred in directing

DCIT, CIRCLE-35, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INDIAN COAL AGENCY, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 1258/KOL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sonjoy Sarma & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 14A

capital of its own (Rs.148,27,74,222/-) as against investment of only Rs.43,45,97,241/- and hence the presumption taken by the Ld. PCIT for such direction for disallowance towards interest is bad in law and it may be held accordingly. 4. Without prejudice to Grounds No. 2 & 3 above, the Ld. PCIT erred in directing

INDIAN COAL AGENCY,KOLKATA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, CIRCLE - 12, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 867/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sonjoy Sarma & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 14A

capital of its own (Rs.148,27,74,222/-) as against investment of only Rs.43,45,97,241/- and hence the presumption taken by the Ld. PCIT for such direction for disallowance towards interest is bad in law and it may be held accordingly. 4. Without prejudice to Grounds No. 2 & 3 above, the Ld. PCIT erred in directing

KOOMBER PROPERTIES & LEASING CO. PVT. LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CPA. BANGALORE. , BANGALORE.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in the above terms

ITA 1250/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Mar 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 250

Capital gains - Short Term: Rs. 22,10,705/- (b) (c) Income from Other Sources: Rs.36,29,000/- (d) Total Income ; Rs.1,08,02,162/- R/Off to : Rs.1,08,02,160/- The tax liability thereon after adjustment of MAT credit available and interest was Rs.25,09,840/- which was fully met. The DCIT, CPC, Bangalore (Assessing Officer) sent a communication dated