EIH LTD.,KOLKATA vs. THE DCIT, CIR-8(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 153/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-8(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Eih Limited [Pan: Aaace 6898 B] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 110/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S Eih Limited -Vs- Dcit, Circle-8(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaace 6898 B] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri Kanchun Kaushal,Ar For The Department : Shri G.Mallikarjuna, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 26.10.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.01.2018 Order Per Bench:

Section 50." 2. We are in agreement with the aforesaid view taken by the High Court. 3. We are informed that the Gujrat High Court as well as Guahati High Court have also taken the same view in the following cases: i) CIT vs. Polestar Industries [2014] 41 taxmann.com 237/221 Taxman 423 ii) CIT vs. Assam Petroleum Industries

DCIT, CIR-8(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S EIH LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 153/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-8(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Eih Limited [Pan: Aaace 6898 B] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A No. 110/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S Eih Limited -Vs- Dcit, Circle-8(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aaace 6898 B] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri Kanchun Kaushal,Ar For The Department : Shri G.Mallikarjuna, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 26.10.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.01.2018 Order Per Bench:

Section 50." 2. We are in agreement with the aforesaid view taken by the High Court. 3. We are informed that the Gujrat High Court as well as Guahati High Court have also taken the same view in the following cases: i) CIT vs. Polestar Industries [2014] 41 taxmann.com 237/221 Taxman 423 ii) CIT vs. Assam Petroleum Industries

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,RAIGANJ, UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 2, JALPAIGURI, JALPAIGURI

TDS was made on the amount of\n₹11,50,213/- and deposited by WBSCB on behalf of the appellant, there\nwas no violation of section

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-4(2), BURDWAN, BURDWAN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1280 To 1285/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 To 2014-15) Special Land Acquisition Vs. I.T.O, Wd-4(2), Burdwan Officer, Burdwan Aayakar Bhawan, Court Compound, Bda Guest House, Badamtala, Burdwan – 713101. Burdwan – 713101. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Cals 16006 E (Assessee) .. (Respondent)

section 194LA of the Act. After examination of the books (Award Registers), the Assessing Officer worked out the TDS u/s 194LA @10% which is given below: Sl Month Amount of Payments TDS u/s 194LA @10% (a) (b) (c) (d) 1 June,2009 5,29,549 52,955 2 July,2009 6,07,544 60,754 3 Ausust

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-4(2), BURDWAN, BURDWAN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1280 To 1285/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 To 2014-15) Special Land Acquisition Vs. I.T.O, Wd-4(2), Burdwan Officer, Burdwan Aayakar Bhawan, Court Compound, Bda Guest House, Badamtala, Burdwan – 713101. Burdwan – 713101. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Cals 16006 E (Assessee) .. (Respondent)

section 194LA of the Act. After examination of the books (Award Registers), the Assessing Officer worked out the TDS u/s 194LA @10% which is given below: Sl Month Amount of Payments TDS u/s 194LA @10% (a) (b) (c) (d) 1 June,2009 5,29,549 52,955 2 July,2009 6,07,544 60,754 3 Ausust

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-4(2), BURDWAN, BURDWAN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1280 To 1285/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 To 2014-15) Special Land Acquisition Vs. I.T.O, Wd-4(2), Burdwan Officer, Burdwan Aayakar Bhawan, Court Compound, Bda Guest House, Badamtala, Burdwan – 713101. Burdwan – 713101. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Cals 16006 E (Assessee) .. (Respondent)

section 194LA of the Act. After examination of the books (Award Registers), the Assessing Officer worked out the TDS u/s 194LA @10% which is given below: Sl Month Amount of Payments TDS u/s 194LA @10% (a) (b) (c) (d) 1 June,2009 5,29,549 52,955 2 July,2009 6,07,544 60,754 3 Ausust

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-4(2), BURDWAN, BURDWAN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1280 To 1285/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 To 2014-15) Special Land Acquisition Vs. I.T.O, Wd-4(2), Burdwan Officer, Burdwan Aayakar Bhawan, Court Compound, Bda Guest House, Badamtala, Burdwan – 713101. Burdwan – 713101. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Cals 16006 E (Assessee) .. (Respondent)

section 194LA of the Act. After examination of the books (Award Registers), the Assessing Officer worked out the TDS u/s 194LA @10% which is given below: Sl Month Amount of Payments TDS u/s 194LA @10% (a) (b) (c) (d) 1 June,2009 5,29,549 52,955 2 July,2009 6,07,544 60,754 3 Ausust

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-4(2), BURDWAN, BURDWAN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1280 To 1285/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 To 2014-15) Special Land Acquisition Vs. I.T.O, Wd-4(2), Burdwan Officer, Burdwan Aayakar Bhawan, Court Compound, Bda Guest House, Badamtala, Burdwan – 713101. Burdwan – 713101. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Cals 16006 E (Assessee) .. (Respondent)

section 194LA of the Act. After examination of the books (Award Registers), the Assessing Officer worked out the TDS u/s 194LA @10% which is given below: Sl Month Amount of Payments TDS u/s 194LA @10% (a) (b) (c) (d) 1 June,2009 5,29,549 52,955 2 July,2009 6,07,544 60,754 3 Ausust

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-4(2), BURDWAN, BURDWAN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA No

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1280 To 1285/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 To 2014-15) Special Land Acquisition Vs. I.T.O, Wd-4(2), Burdwan Officer, Burdwan Aayakar Bhawan, Court Compound, Bda Guest House, Badamtala, Burdwan – 713101. Burdwan – 713101. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. :Cals 16006 E (Assessee) .. (Respondent)

section 194LA of the Act. After examination of the books (Award Registers), the Assessing Officer worked out the TDS u/s 194LA @10% which is given below: Sl Month Amount of Payments TDS u/s 194LA @10% (a) (b) (c) (d) 1 June,2009 5,29,549 52,955 2 July,2009 6,07,544 60,754 3 Ausust

TAPAS KUMAR SARKAR,BARASAT, NORTH TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS vs. I.T.O., WARD - 50(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Rakesh Mishra

50,05,666 and 26,24,969 under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. Section 40(a)(ia) is a compliance

TAPAS KUMAR SARKAR,BARASAT, NORTH TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS vs. I.T.O., WARD - 50(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Rakesh Mishra

50,05,666 and 26,24,969 under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. Section 40(a)(ia) is a compliance

M/S RECKITT BENCKISER (I) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. JCIT, R-12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed while both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

TDS under section 194 on the reimbursement of salary of seconded I.T.A. Nos. 1671/KOL./2008 & 1024/KOL/2009 Assessment years: 2003-2004 & 2004-2005 & I.T.A. Nos. 1699/KOL/2008 & 973/KOL/2009 Assessment years: 2003-2004 & 2004-2005 Page 10 of 34 employees. Keeping in view these decisions of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Nagase India Pvt. Limited (supra) and Temasek

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,RAIGANJ, UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. JCIT (TDS), RANGE - 6, SILIGURI

TDS was made on the amount of\n₹11,50,213/- and deposited by WBSCB on behalf of the appellant, there\nwas no violation of section

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,RAIGANJ, UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. D,C,I.T., CIRCLE - 2, JALPAIGURI, JALPAIGURI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

TDS was made on the amount of ₹11,50,213/- and deposited by WBSCB on behalf of the appellant, there was no violation of section

N C SHAW AND CO BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS CIRCLE 2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Sri Rakesh Mishra

section 194Q of the Act relating to TDS on purchase of any goods of the value or aggregate of value exceeding Rs. 50

N C SHAW AND CO BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RANGE-2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Sri Rakesh Mishra

section 194Q of the Act relating to TDS on purchase of any goods of the value or aggregate of value exceeding Rs. 50

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. DEY'S MEDICAL (U.P.) PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2005-06

section 40(a)(ia) was invoked by the AO to disallow these expenditures made in the garb of the term 'reimbursement' to avail the dual 15 Dey’s Medical (UP) Pvt. ltd. AY 2005-06 advantage of reducing profit and TDS burden on the payees. It was prayed that the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) on this count

ITO, WD-58(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S ITD-ITD CEM JV (CONSORTIUM OF ITD ITD CEMENTATION), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Section 194H. Therefore following the above 2 decisions of the Tribunal and considering the facts as discussed above, it is held that the AO was not justified in holding the Appellant liable to deduct TDS on these payments and this round of Appeal is allowed.” 13. The learned AR relied on the orders of CIT(A). 14. Heard rival submissions

SARDA MINES PVT. LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-05(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. No. 867/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Sarda Mines Pvt. Ltd...............................………………………………………………Appellant 6Th Floor, Circular Court, 8, Ajc Bose Road, Kolkata – 700017. [Pan : Aahcs 2419 R] D.C.I.T., Cir 5(2) Kolkata………………………………………………......................Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 69 Appearances By: Shri A.K. Gupta, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Md. Usman, Cit Dr Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 21, 2017 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 14, 2017 Order Per P.M. Jagtap, Am This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Principal Cit – 2, Kolkata Dated 28.03.2017 Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 & The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Therein Read As Under: “1. For That The Order Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) By The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Kolkata (In Short ‘Cit’) Dated 28.03.2017 Is Without Jurisdiction & Illegal As None Of The Condition Precedent For Exercise Of The Power Under Section 263 Of The Act Exists And/Or Has Been Satisfied & As Such The Said Order Is Erroneous & Without Jurisdiction & Liable To Be Cancelled. 2. For That The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Was Not In Any Way Erroneous Or Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue & As Such The Cit Would Not Exercise Any Power Under Section 263 Of The Act. The Cit Erred In Holding That The Order Of Assessment Is Erroneous & Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue.

50 lacs during the relevant previous year and it also gave full details in respect of the payment made and as such no order under section 263 of the Act should have been passed in respect of the same and the same is erroneous, illegal and perverse. 2. The relevant facts of the case giving rise to this appeal