BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “TDS”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai74Ahmedabad44Delhi35Hyderabad34Bangalore29Jaipur25Visakhapatnam25Pune19Chennai16Kolkata10Chandigarh9Raipur7Agra6Lucknow6Rajkot4Nagpur4Cochin2Jabalpur2Cuttack1Amritsar1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 148A22Section 14717Section 14815Section 698TDS8Addition to Income8Section 270A4Section 2504Section 684Section 10

M/S. SHREE PRAKASH TRACON PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 5(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1873/KOL/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Nov 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm M/S Shree Prakash Tracon Pvt. Income Tax Officer, Ltd. Ward 591), Kokata P-7, Room No. 301/A/1, Avani Chowringhee Square, Aaykar Vs. Signature, 91/A/1, Park Street, Bhavan,Kolkata-700069 Kolkata-700016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aakcs7629A Assessee By : Shri Sunil Surana, Ar Revenue By : Shri Pradip Biswas, Dr Date Of Hearing: 29.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2024

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pradip Biswas, DR
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 148ASection 69C

Section 148A of the Act dated 07/04/2022, stating there that the notice issued u/s 148A(b) was not complied with till 25.03.2022 and the income to the tune of ₹2,23,23,329/- has escaped assessment for A.Y. 2018-19 on account of TDS

3
Unexplained Cash Credit3
Penalty2

RAJU SAHA,BARASAT, TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS NORTH vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE - 61,, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2056/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 2056/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Raju Saha,……………………………….……...……Appellant Swapanapuri, Duttapukur Hatkhola, Barasat, 24-Parganas (N), Kolkata-743248, West Bengal [Pan:Awops1579E] -Vs.- Dcit/Acit,…………………………………….……..Respondent Circle-61, Kolkata, Office Of The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bamboo Villa, 169, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata-700014

Section 10Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 192Section 270ASection 80C

148A(d) of the 2 Raju Saha Act with the prior approval of the specified authority, but the assessee did not make any compliance. As the assessee did not furnish any information, the assessee was again requested to furnish the requisite information by way of issuance of another notice under section 142(1) of the Act dated

RANICHERRA TEA CO. LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 609/KOL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2017-18 Ranicherra Tea Co. Ltd. Ito, Ward-4(4), Kolkata. C/O, P. K. Himatsinghka & Co. 41, B. B. Ganguly Vs. Street, Central Plaza, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata-700012. (Pan: (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. K. Himatsinghka, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ankur Goyal, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 153CSection 250Section 68

148A is without jurisdiction, the notice so issued is unlawful, illegal, bad in law and liable to be quashed, and subsequent proceeding continued with such non-jurisdictional notice are also not sustainable in law and void-ab-initio. 2 Ranicherra Tea Co. Ltd., AY 2017-18 3. That the assessment order dated 30.03.2022 has been framed u/s 147 r.w.s 144B

HAYWIZZ HAVELOCK ISLAND RESORT,PORT BLAIR vs. ITO, WARD 3(4), PORT BLAIR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2255/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jan 2026AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148ASection 194Section 250

TDS Form 26Q, section 1941(b) of the Act to the tune of ₹41,00,000/- which appeared to have escaped assessment. The Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'AO') noted that the assessee had entered into the transactions for the sale/purchase and had received rent but had not filed a return of income. Therefore, a show cause notice

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, SILIGURI vs. VAISHNODEVI BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED, SILIGURI

In the result, both the appeals of the of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1383/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury &For Respondent: Shri S.B. Chakraborthy, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 148ASection 68

148A(d)of the Act and only thereafter, issued notice u/s 148 of the Act as refereed to (supra). Though the assessee did not comply with the questionnaire and notice issued initially but afterwards furnished all the details/ information qua the said loan including confirmation, details of interest paid and TDS deducted at sources and payment thereof. However

DCIT,CIRCLE-1, SILIGURI vs. VAISHNODEVI BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED, SILIGURI

In the result, both the appeals of the of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1382/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury &For Respondent: Shri S.B. Chakraborthy, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 148ASection 68

148A(d)of the Act and only thereafter, issued notice u/s 148 of the Act as refereed to (supra). Though the assessee did not comply with the questionnaire and notice issued initially but afterwards furnished all the details/ information qua the said loan including confirmation, details of interest paid and TDS deducted at sources and payment thereof. However

ESTATE OF BINOY KUMAR CHANDRA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 32(2),, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2810/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Apr 2026AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Estate Of Binoy Kumar Chandra Vs. Office Of The Income-Tax Officer P-24, C.I.T. Road Entally, Ward-32(2), Kolkata, 10B, Kolkata-700014, West Bengal Middleton Row, Kolkata-700 71 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabae6679B Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan & Ms. Lata Goyal, Ars Revenue By : Shri Aditya Bikram, Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 15.04.2026

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan &For Respondent: Shri Aditya Bikram, DR
Section 143(2)Section 148Section 148ASection 270ASection 270A(2)(b)Section 270A(6)

148A(d) of the Act, was passed on 22.03.2024, and notice u/s 148 of the Act, was issued. Finally, on the same date the assessee by filing a return of income on 10.05.2024, declared a total income of Rs.80,68,052/- as appearing in Form 26AS and also paid due taxes along with interest thereon. Thereafter, notice

RAM AZAD PAL,DURGAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2300/KOL/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jun 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm & Shri Sanjay Awasthi, Am Income Tax Officer, Ram Azad Pal Ward 2(4), Ranchi Colony, Benachity, Aaykar Bhavan, City Centre, Faridpur, Durgapur, Pin-713213, Vs. Durgapur, Pin-713216, West Bengal West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aoypp0987E Assessee By : Shri Vishal Agarwal, Ar Revenue By : Shri Nicholas Murmu, Dr Date Of Hearing: 17.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 23.06.2025

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Nicholas Murmu, DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 194Section 194CSection 69

TDS was made u/s 194 & u/s 194C of the Act. On the basis of this information the Assessing Officer initiated proceedings u/s 147 of the Act and issued notice u/s 148 of the Act on 15.04.2021. Later on, as per ruling given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal dated

NIRMALA SHARMA,GANGTOK vs. I.T.O., WARD - 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2227/KOL/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Feb 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 147Section 250Section 69

148A(b) of the Act. The assessee had stated in response to the aforesaid Page 3 of 10 I.T.A. No.: 2227/KOL/2024 I.T.A. No.: 2298/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Nirmala Sharma. notice that she is a Sikkimese individual holding a certificate of Identification having volume number and serial number of the Government of Sikkim. She further stated that her source

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 3(1), GANGTOK, GANGTOK, SIKKIM vs. NIRMALA SHARMA, SORENG, WEST SIKKIM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2298/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 147Section 250Section 69

148A(b) of the Act. The assessee had stated in response to the aforesaid Page 3 of 10 I.T.A. No.: 2227/KOL/2024 I.T.A. No.: 2298/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Nirmala Sharma. notice that she is a Sikkimese individual holding a certificate of Identification having volume number and serial number of the Government of Sikkim. She further stated that her source