BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

317 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 56(2)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,159Mumbai912Bangalore335Karnataka317Ahmedabad194Hyderabad175Jaipur159Chennai155Chandigarh131Kolkata115Indore90Cochin66Calcutta54Pune51Rajkot30Lucknow30Cuttack29Surat25Guwahati20Raipur19Nagpur19SC19Telangana17Jodhpur14Agra9Varanasi5Kerala5Rajasthan4Amritsar3Visakhapatnam2Allahabad2Ranchi2Orissa1Jabalpur1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Dehradun1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Addition to Income56Section 26020Section 404Section 5(2)3Disallowance2

HEWLETT PACKARD FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

STRP/412/2015HC Karnataka19 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 23(1)Section 39(1)Section 5(2)Section 65(1)

transferred to the appellant and till then the rights over the goods wrests with the end customer only. In-fact in the MLA as pointed out by the FAA and AA, the description of leased equipments are not forthcoming and the appellant is not aware of the goods to be leased till the purchase order is placed

WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/20040/2019HC Karnataka25 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit Writ Petition No.20040/2019 (T-It) Between:

Showing 1–20 of 317 · Page 1 of 16

...
Section 1Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 254Section 92C

56,39,522/-; the Assessee grieves against denial of 3% addl. interest envisaged u/s 244A(1A) for the 6 period between 28.12.2017 i.e., date of ITAT order and 4.5.2019 i.e., the date on which refund was finally granted; this period being seventeen months, the Assessee quantifies the interest amount at Rs.58.65 crore. 6. SUBMISSIONS CANVASSED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

R JANARDHANA BABU vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed

WP/37528/2010HC Karnataka07 Jul 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

56 years, Working as pharma Assistant, 58 Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited, Devanahalli Road, Off Old Madras Road, Bangalore-560049 201. M Venkatesh, s/o Muniswamy Reddy, aged about 55 years, Working as pharma Assistant, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited, Devanahalli Road, Off Old Madras Road, Bangalore-560049. 202. Byre Gowda, s/o T Anjanappa, aged about 55 years, Working as pharma Assistant, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOLDMAN SACHS SERVICES PVT LTD

ITA/29/2019HC Karnataka10 Jun 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Srishananda Civil Revision Petition No.29/2019 Between

Section 115Section 37(2)

price realized by sale of flats.  The further observation of civil court that the observation of arbitrator about the firm being not impleaded in proceedings is questioned by Petitioner is unsustainable in law. There is no dispute between the firm and the partners. A firm is only a compendious name of all the partners. When all the partners

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 vs. M/S. PUMA SPORTS INDIA P., LTD.,

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/223/2018HC Karnataka12 Mar 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 260Section 40Section 5(2)(b)Section 9(1)(i)Section 92C

transfer pricing adjustment for Rs.4,16,65,106/- on the basis of the order passed under Section 92CA of the Act dated 24.10.2016. The assessing authority also made other additions. The assessee’s objections were not considered by the Dispute Resumption Panel and therefore, an appeal was 3 filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore (hereinafter referred

SRI U M RAMESH RAO vs. UNION BANK OF INDIA

In the result, the writ appeals are disposed in

WA/538/2020HC Karnataka29 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,R. NATARAJ

Section 17Section 31Section 4

56. Before proceeding further, it would be useful to refer to Articles 246 of the Constitution. Article 246 deals with subject matter of laws made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States. -: 68 :- (a) Clause (1) of Article 246 states that notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3) Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect

M/S SSJV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. M/S ALLAHABAD BANK

In the result, the writ appeals are disposed in

WA/545/2020HC Karnataka29 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,R. NATARAJ

Section 17Section 31Section 4

56. Before proceeding further, it would be useful to refer to Articles 246 of the Constitution. Article 246 deals with subject matter of laws made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States. -: 68 :- (a) Clause (1) of Article 246 states that notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3) Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect

MR. BINEESH KODIYERI vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

WP/13261/2020HC Karnataka16 Mar 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Suraj Govindaraj Writ Petition No. 13261 Of 2020 (Gm-Res) Between: Mr. Bineesh Kodiyeri S/O Mr. Kodiyeri Balakrishnan Aged About 37 Years Kootamvilla Lane, Maruthankuzhi Thiruvananthapuram District Kerala State – 695013

Section 19Section 482

56 conclusions for arrest and the Magistrate in turn is to be satisfied that the condition precedent for arrest under Section 41 Cr.P.C. has been satisfied and it is only thereafter that he will authorise the detention of an accused. 8.3. The Magistrate before authorising detention will record his own satisfaction, may be in brief but the said satisfaction must

SMT. S. JALAJA vs. UNION OF INDIA

In the result, writ appeals are allowed

WA/1105/2019HC Karnataka24 Aug 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 4

2) the jurisdiction to convict, the State law empowering the Court to convict summarily, the Commonwealth Law making the contravention an indictable offence, and therefore bringing into operation sec. 80 of the Constitution, requiring a jury; (3) the penalty, the State providing a maximum of $ 50 the Commonwealth Act prescribing a maximum of $ 100, or imprisonment, or both

M/S SRI BALAJI CORPORATE SERVICES vs. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE

WP/43206/2018HC Karnataka21 Apr 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 96

56, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU -560 032 5. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY/ PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT & CHAIRMAN KIADB, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE -560 001 6. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD IV AND V FLOORS, KHANIJI BHAVAN, NO. 49, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

L. VENKATARAMANA RAJU vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53718/2017HC Karnataka21 Apr 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 96

56, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU -560 032 5. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY/ PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT & CHAIRMAN KIADB, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE -560 001 6. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD IV AND V FLOORS, KHANIJI BHAVAN, NO. 49, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

M/S. SRI SHIV SHAKTI STEEL & ALLOYS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

WP/52678/2016HC Karnataka04 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

56 AGED AROUND 78 YEARS R/O.Dr.NAGAN GOWDA GARDENS STATION ROAD, HOSPET-583 201 BELLARY DISTRICT ...PETITIONER (BY SHRI.D.L.N.RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI.ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S.BUILDING Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE

SATHVAHANA ISPAT LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

WP/43871/2016HC Karnataka04 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

56 AGED AROUND 78 YEARS R/O.Dr.NAGAN GOWDA GARDENS STATION ROAD, HOSPET-583 201 BELLARY DISTRICT ...PETITIONER (BY SHRI.D.L.N.RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI.ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S.BUILDING Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE

FEDERATION OF INDIAN MINING vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

WP/44253/2016HC Karnataka04 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

56 AGED AROUND 78 YEARS R/O.Dr.NAGAN GOWDA GARDENS STATION ROAD, HOSPET-583 201 BELLARY DISTRICT ...PETITIONER (BY SHRI.D.L.N.RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI.ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S.BUILDING Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE

HINDUSTAN CALCINED METALS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

WP/46232/2016HC Karnataka04 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

56 AGED AROUND 78 YEARS R/O.Dr.NAGAN GOWDA GARDENS STATION ROAD, HOSPET-583 201 BELLARY DISTRICT ...PETITIONER (BY SHRI.D.L.N.RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI.ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S.BUILDING Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE

M/S ELECTROTHERM (INDIA)LTD vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

WP/51110/2016HC Karnataka04 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

56 AGED AROUND 78 YEARS R/O.Dr.NAGAN GOWDA GARDENS STATION ROAD, HOSPET-583 201 BELLARY DISTRICT ...PETITIONER (BY SHRI.D.L.N.RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI.ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S.BUILDING Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE

GERDAU STEEL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

WP/44993/2016HC Karnataka04 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

56 AGED AROUND 78 YEARS R/O.Dr.NAGAN GOWDA GARDENS STATION ROAD, HOSPET-583 201 BELLARY DISTRICT ...PETITIONER (BY SHRI.D.L.N.RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI.ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S.BUILDING Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE

M/S. BMM ISPAT LTD vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result, these petitions must succeed

WP/43969/2016HC Karnataka04 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),P.S.DINESH KUMAR

56 AGED AROUND 78 YEARS R/O.Dr.NAGAN GOWDA GARDENS STATION ROAD, HOSPET-583 201 BELLARY DISTRICT ...PETITIONER (BY SHRI.D.L.N.RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI.ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S.BUILDING Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE