Search: section 68

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 9Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

R JANARDHANA BABU vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed

WP/37528/2010HC Karnataka07 Jul 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

Section 3 of the Act the expression “employee” only covers those who are workmen under clause (s) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the ‘ID Act’). The expression “workman” as defined in clause (s) of Section 2 of the ID Act relates to those who are existing employees. The only addition

S RANGASWAMY NAIK vs. B R RAVIKANTHE GOWDA

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed

WP/26731/2009HC Karnataka19 Apr 2013

Bench: B.MANOHAR,N.KUMAR

9A read with Clause (a) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the 1973 Act, the Government of Karnataka has made the Karnataka State Civil Services (Regularization of Promotion, Pay and Pension) Rules 1978 (for short hereinafter referred to as `the 1978 Rules’). This Rule provides for promotion from a retrospective date. Rule 2 reads as under

R JANARDHANA BABU vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

S RANGASWAMY NAIK vs. B R RAVIKANTHE GOWDA

R JANARDHANA BABU vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

S RANGASWAMY NAIK vs. B R RAVIKANTHE GOWDA

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

M/S ARASOR CORPORATION vs. M/S XALTED INFORMATION SYSTEMS PVT LTD

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S UNITED SPIRITS LTD (IN THE CASE OF CENTRAL