SHRI NARAYAN RAO HEBRI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,K. V. ARAVIND

68, when the conditions of the said section are not satisfied. 5.2. The Learned Commissioner (Appeals) is not justified in upholding the impugned addition when the Appellant established that he had sufficient source for deposit of cash to the bank account. 5.3. The Lower Authorities are not justified in rejecting the explanation of the Appellant of cash withdrawals being

SHRI. JAGANNATH S SHETTY vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh

Section 96 of CPC as well as while exercising the power under Order 41 take note of Rule 22, 23 and 28 and also Rule 33 of Order 41 of CPC. It is the 68

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S INTEVA PRODUCTS INDIA AUTOMATIVE PVT LTD.,

Appeals are dismissed with costs

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE I AND SEC.96 OF C.P.C., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.10.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.3484/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE 26TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR POSSESSION MESNE PROFITS. THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON 26.05.2022, THIS DAY, RAVI V. HOSMANI J., PRONOUNCED

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S ESSAR DIGITRONICS PVT LTD

Appeals are dismissed with costs

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE I AND SEC.96 OF C.P.C., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.10.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.3484/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE 26TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR POSSESSION MESNE PROFITS. THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON 26.05.2022, THIS DAY, RAVI V. HOSMANI J., PRONOUNCED

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S UNITED SPIRITS LTD (IN THE CASE OF CENTRAL

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.NAGAPRASANNA

96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 29.10.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.11112/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVIII ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION, DISMISSING THE COUNTER CLAIM OF THE DEFENDANT NO.2 AND 4 TO 7 THEREIN. 9 THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD

SHRI.GAYATRI CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum W.P.No.147037/2020 (T-It) Between: Shri Gayatri Credit Co-Operative Society Sulebhavi No.Main Road, Sulebhavi-587124, Dist: Bagalkot, Rep.By Its Chief Executive Officer, Shri Hemanth S/O Chandrasekhar Duttaragi, Aged About 49 Years.

96,859/-, declared total income as Nil. The authorities have taken up the case of the petitioner-society for limited scrutiny under CASS by way issuing notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Act, 4 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). The petitioner-society has submitted its replies online with a hardcopy in tapal. Respondent No.1 rejected the petitioner

SRI C THIMMA REDDY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

SRI KRISHANAMA RAJU vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

M THIYAGARAJAN vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

M/S. SUMADHURA INFRACON PVT. LTD., vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

M/S BHARTIYA CITY DEVELOPERS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

SRI M MUNISWAMY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

M/S SOBHA LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

L & T CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENT vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

DR M RAVINDRA VARMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

SRI. SHIVALINGAIAH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI

SMT. H G SHEELA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

96,68,000/- [RUPEES ONE CRORE NINETY SIX LAKHS SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND ONLY] TOWARDS GROUND RENT TOWARDS 21 PENALTY FOR BUIDLING CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT OBTAINING COMMENCEMENT CERTIFICATE AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.11065/2017 BETWEEN 1. THE STANDARD BRICK AND TILE COMPANY (YELAHANKA) PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BENGALURU- BALLARI