BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

697 results for “section 68”+ Section 28clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,091Mumbai4,456Bangalore1,569Kolkata1,098Chennai1,094Ahmedabad1,015Jaipur899Hyderabad748Karnataka697Pune562Indore456Chandigarh455Surat447Cochin272Raipur253Rajkot205Visakhapatnam205Nagpur141Agra140Lucknow138Amritsar119Cuttack119Telangana118Guwahati97SC83Ranchi78Calcutta77Allahabad68Jodhpur58Patna53Panaji39Jabalpur28Dehradun25Varanasi21Kerala10Rajasthan10Orissa9Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2Gauhati2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Tripura1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1

Key Topics

Section 26035Addition to Income33Section 80H22Section 1487Section 153A6Section 276Section 143(3)5Section 1435Deduction5Section 80J

ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

WA/200056/2021HC Karnataka22 Dec 2022

Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR,K S HEMALEKHA

Section 4

Section 28(4) of the KIAD Act were issued in respect of the said lands in said villages. (ii) The KIADB wrote a letter dated 07.04.1982 to the Appellant allotting lands, which had been acquired under the aforementioned notifications. The land price was fixed at Rs.2808.30/- per acre, pursuant to which, an award dated 28.05.1982 came to be passed

M/S SUPER SALES CORPORATION vs. THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL

In the result, the Writ petition is dismissed

WP/14711/2003HC Karnataka08 Oct 2012

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,VIKRAMAJIT SEN (CJ)

28 (both inclusive).] * * * * -: 65 :- 34. Act to have over-riding effect – (1) Save as provided under sub-section (2), the provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this

Showing 1–20 of 697 · Page 1 of 35

...
4
Disallowance4
Depreciation4

S N SIMHA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

In the result there is no merit in this writ petition and the

WP/24840/2012HC Karnataka04 Oct 2012

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy Writ Petition No. 24840 Of 2012 (La-Kiadb) Between: 1. S.N.Simha, Aged About 73 Years, Son Of Late G.R.Swamy, 2. S.N.Yamuna Devi, Wife Of Sri. S.N.Simha, Aged About 66 Years, Both Are Proprietors M/S. Viswabandhu Press & Sree Bharathi Cottage Industries Company, No.16, 1St Cross, Cottonpet, Bangalore – 560 053. …Petitioners (By Shri. S.P.Shankar, Senior Advocate For Shri. K.L.Sreenivas, Advocate For M/S. K.N.L. Associates) And: 1. The State Of Karnataka, Represented By Its Secretary, Commerce & Industries

Section 28(4)Section 3

28(4) of the Act, under Sub- section (5) of the same provision the acquired lands shall vest absolutely in the State Government free from all encumbrances. If the State Government cannot change the land use other than the purpose for which it is already earmarked in the CDP in view of the decisions of the Apex Court which

M/S APPLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMiTED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/13810/2018HC Karnataka27 Nov 2019

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice S.Sujatha

Section 111Section 112Section 28Section 28ASection 3Section 4A

68,087/- should not be confiscated under Section 111[m] of the Customs Act, 1962. [ii] The differential duty of Rs.9,70,981/- should not be demanded and recovered from them under the provisions of Section 28

THE HANUMAN TRANSPORT CO PVT LTD vs. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY

WP/23376/2017HC Karnataka22 Jun 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice S.Sujatha

Section 68[3][ca] of the Act requires examination which has not been properly considered and addressed by the Authority. The petitions cannot be rejected at the threshold on the ground of alternative remedy. 17. At this juncture, it would be apt to refer to the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of ‘STATE

AJITH U SHENOY vs. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY

WP/23190/2017HC Karnataka22 Jun 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice S.Sujatha

Section 68[3][ca] of the Act requires examination which has not been properly considered and addressed by the Authority. The petitions cannot be rejected at the threshold on the ground of alternative remedy. 17. At this juncture, it would be apt to refer to the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of ‘STATE

NIRMALA BAGODI vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41506/2017HC Karnataka13 Dec 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice G. Narendar Writ Petition No.41506/2017 (Apmc) C/W Writ Petition No.41507/2017 (Apmc)

Section 17

28 “or through such member becoming disqualified”. He would further contend that the language employed in Section 17 (1) is would suffice to demonstrate that the vacancy or cessation of membership is deemed to have become vacant and no separate order or declaration is required to declare the seat as vacant. He would 43 contend that the principles

SRI CHITURI DURGA RAO vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41507/2017HC Karnataka13 Dec 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice G. Narendar Writ Petition No.41506/2017 (Apmc) C/W Writ Petition No.41507/2017 (Apmc)

Section 17

28 “or through such member becoming disqualified”. He would further contend that the language employed in Section 17 (1) is would suffice to demonstrate that the vacancy or cessation of membership is deemed to have become vacant and no separate order or declaration is required to declare the seat as vacant. He would 43 contend that the principles

SMT. S. JALAJA vs. UNION OF INDIA

In the result, writ appeals are allowed

WA/1105/2019HC Karnataka24 Aug 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 4

SECTION 28(1) OF THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A & ETC. IN W.P.No.12283 OF 2019 BETWEEN 1. VIJAYA D/O. LATE SEENA POOJARI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESIDING AT PONGARNAR MANE PERMUDE MANGALURU-574509 2. AMBIKA D/O. LATE SEENA POOJARI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT PONGARNAR MANE PERMUDE 51 MANGALURU-574509 3. NIRMALA

SMT.RUKMINI @ RUKMINIBAI vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

WP/107889/2016HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

RAMESH S/O. SATAPPA KHODANPUR vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/106269/2015HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

M/S SRI. KRISHNA MILKS PRIVATE LTD., vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/106558/2015HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

DHARWAD, HAVERI vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/112263/2017HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

MAHAMMAD GOUSE S/O JAFARSAB SAVANUR, vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

WP/103479/2016HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

PREMABAI W/O MOHAN GAONKAR vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/103548/2016HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

DILIPKUMAR vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

WP/104728/2016HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

SHRI. DHARMASTALA MANJUNATHESHWARA EDUCATION vs. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

WP/104989/2018HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

SRI.ARUN VENKANNA NAVALI, vs. HUBBALLI DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,

WP/108208/2016HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

CHAMANSAB S/O ALLABHKSHA PATHAN vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/103483/2016HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR

SRI. SHASHIDHAR vs. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITIONI OFFICER

WP/103380/2016HC Karnataka22 Dec 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar W.P Nos.108208 -108209 /2016 (La-Res) C/W W.P No.104784/2016, Wp No.106158/2016, W.P No.106159/2016, W.P No.106157/2016, W.P No.107889/2016, W.P Nos.109564 - 109565/2016, W.P No.112114/2017, W.P No.112263/2017, W.P Nos.104989-990/2018, W.P No.106557/2015, W.P Nos.106269-106270/2015, W.P No.103770/2015, W.P No.104783/2016, W.P No.104728/2016, W.P No.104025/2016, W.P No.103548/2016, W.P Nos.103486-103488/2016, W.P No.103319/2016, W.P No.102905/2016, W.P No.103019/2016, W.P No.102904/2016, W.P No.103451/2016, W.P No.103447/2016, W.P No.104785/2016, W.P No.103380/2016, W.P No.101172/2016, W.P No.106558/2015, W.P Nos.100431-100435/2016, W.P Nos.103479-103481/2016, W.P Nos.103483-103484/2016, W.P No.103485/2016 & W.P No.103482/2016

SECTION 28 OF KARNATAKA STATE HIGH WAY ACT AND TO PAY LEGAL COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC., IN W.P.Nos.109564 - 109565/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY, S/O SHANKARAPPA SHETTEMMANAVAR, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA', SUNAGAR CHAWAL, OPP DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, P.B.ROAD, DHARWAD. 2. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI, W/O SANJAY SHETTEMMANAVAR AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 38/4 'SHOBHA' SUNAGAR