SMT.ASHVINI W/O JAGANATH SHIVAMOGGI vs. SMT.S.A HEMA W/O S V ANANTHA PADMANABHA

In the result, we proceed to pass the

Bench: S G PANDIT,V.SRISHANANDA

173 of the Act also reflects that there is no curtailment or limitations on the powers of the appellate Court to consider the entire case on facts and law. 11. It is well settled that the right of appeal is a substantive right and the questions of fact and law are at large and are open to review

LAKSHMI BAI W/O SRINIVAS RAO ALAVANDIKAR vs. G ADINARAYAN S/O G. KONDANNA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Ravi V. Hosmani

173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINSGT THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 09.10.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.375/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GANGAVATHI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. 9 THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Though

KUMARI S MANASA BHAKTHA vs. THE MANAGING PARTNER

In the result, we pass the following:

Bench: B.VEERAPPA,K.S. HEMALEKHA

SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 29.11.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.735/16 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT. KARKALA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THESE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, B.VEERAPPA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 8 JUDGMENT All these appeals

SYED AKRAM vs. FAYAZ AHAMMED

In the result, MFA No. 1348/2018 and MFA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,RAVI V HOSMANI

173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.02.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.275/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ADDITIONAL MACT, CHANNPATTANA, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.10,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSIT. THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR DICTATION OF JUDGMENT THROUGH

THE CLAIM MANAGER vs. SMT. LATHA B J

The appeals are allowed in part

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (‘M.V.Act’ for short). 2. Brief facts as stated are that on 02.06.2015 at about 7:30 p.m. Girish was riding his motorcycle bearing registration No. KA-45-Q-0576 at Periyaptna - Kushalnagara road. When he was in front of Dasharath’s house, a lorry bearing registration No. KA-50-0239 came in a rash

CHANDRAPPA vs. PRAKASH JARIYAPPA

Bench: B.VEERAPPA,RAVI V HOSMANI

SECTION 173(01) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.10.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO.877/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, 5 HARIHAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, B. VEERAPPA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT MFA No.4986/2020 is filed

THE MANAGER vs. SARASWATHAMMA

The appeals are disposed of

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice H.T.Narendra Prasad Mfa No.2880 Of 2014(Mv) C/W Mfa No.2881 Of 2014(Mv)

173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 18.12.2013 passed by the MACT, Tumkur in 5 MVC Nos.590/2008 and 8267/2009, respectively. Since the challenge is to the same judgment, both the appeals are clubbed together, heard and common judgment is being passed. 2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeals briefly stated

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR vs. VIJAYA @ VIJAYAMMA

The appeals are disposed of

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice H.T.Narendra Prasad Mfa No.2880 Of 2014(Mv) C/W Mfa No.2881 Of 2014(Mv)

173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 18.12.2013 passed by the MACT, Tumkur in 5 MVC Nos.590/2008 and 8267/2009, respectively. Since the challenge is to the same judgment, both the appeals are clubbed together, heard and common judgment is being passed. 2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeals briefly stated

SMT. SANGEETA W/OKISHORE SINGH DIED BY HER LRS AND ORS vs. NASIR MIYAN S/O SADAQ MIYAN AND ORS

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur Mfa No.31849 Of 2013 (Mv)

Section 173(1) of the MV Act, praying against the judgment and award dated 10.04.2012 passed in MVC No.30/2009 on the file of the presiding officer FTC-I And Addl.M.A.C.T at Bidar, partly allowing the claim petition and seeking enhancement of compensation and etc. These Appeals are coming on for Hearing, this day, the court delivered the following: JUDGMENT These

MALLANGOUDA S/O LATE JAGADEVAPPA PATIL vs. DILEEP KUMAR S/O RAJARAM BHOSALE AND ANR

The appeal is allowed in part

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ashok S. Kinagi M. F. A. No.200461 Of 2021 (Mv) Between: Mallangouda, S/O Late Jagadevappa Patil, Aged About 43 Years, Occ: Legal Practitioner, R/O. Banashankari Nagar, Old Jewargi Road, Kalaburagi. … Appellant (By Smt.Geetha Sajjanshetty, Advocate) And: 1. Dileep Kumar, S/O Rajaram Bhosale, Aged About 60 Years, Occ: Driver, R/O. Plot No.52, Cib Colony, Behind Central Bus Stand, Kalaburagi - 585 103. (Owner-Cum-Driver). 2. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co., Dr. Jawali Complex

173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for short) has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 25.07.2019 passed in MVC No.621/2017 by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kalaburagi. 3 2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred

THE FUTURE GENERAL INDIA vs. SRI DINABANDHU SAHU

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 22.05.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.1015/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIII ACMM, MEMBER, MACT-III, (SCCH-19), BENGALURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.55,76,900/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 9% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS REALIZATION. THESE MFAs

SRI DINABANDHU SAHU vs. M/S BAGAIRATHI TRAVEL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 22.05.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.1015/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIII ACMM, MEMBER, MACT-III, (SCCH-19), BENGALURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.55,76,900/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 9% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS REALIZATION. THESE MFAs

ANJANADEVI vs. DUDANI EXPORTERS PVT.TD.,

In the result, appeal is allowed in part with costs

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Ravi V.Hosmani

173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as M.V. Act). 2. Though this appeal is listed for admission, with the consent of learned counsel for parties, it is taken up for final disposal. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as per their respective ranks before the tribunal. 4. Brief facts

SAKUBAI AND ORS vs. SUNIL AND ANR

The appeal is allowed in part

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Ashok S. Kinagi Mfa No.200033/2018 (Mv) Between: 1. Sakubai W/O Late Ramesh @ Arjun Rathod Aged: 37 Years, Occ: Household Now Nil 2. Naresh S/O Late Ramesh@ Arjun Rathod Aged: 18 Years, Occ: Student 3. Komal D/O Late Ramesh @ Arjun Rathod Aged: 16 Years, Occ: Student 4. Rohit S/O Late Ramesh@ Arjun Rathod Aged: 14 Years, Occ: Student 5. Heerabai W/O Late Kishan Rathod, Aged: 71 Years, Occ: Household Appellant Nos. 3 & 4 Are Under Guardianship Of Their Natural Mother I.E, Appellant No.1 All R/O Shampur Halli Tanda Tq. Chittapur, Dist: Kalaburagi Now At H.No.1/10 Near Aland Naka Kalaburagi ... Appellants (By Sri Sanjeev Patil, Advocate)

173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short) by the claimants challenging the judgment and award dated 25.04.2017 passed in MVC No.239/2016 by the Senior Civil Judge and MACT at Chittapur. 2. The parties are referred as per their ranking before the Tribunal. 3. The facts leading to filing of this appeal

SMT MONTHI N PAI vs. SRI SANJEEVA SHETTY

The appeals are allowed in part

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh

SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.07.2012 PASSED IN MVC.NO.125/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, MACT, SAGAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THESE MFAs’ COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THROUGH ‘VIDEO CONFERENCE’ THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING

SMT LAKSHMAMMA vs. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh

173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.04.2013 PASSED IN MVC.NO.7171/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXVIII ACMM, MACT, BENGALURU AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.11,99,967/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT IN TRIBUNAL. THESE M.F.As. HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT

M/S. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh

173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.04.2013 PASSED IN MVC.NO.7171/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXVIII ACMM, MACT, BENGALURU AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.11,99,967/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT IN TRIBUNAL. THESE M.F.As. HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT

SONAL JADAV. S vs. NATIONAL INS CO. LTD.,

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 6 09.07.2018, PASSED IN MVC NO.396/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., & VI MACT, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING