Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 163clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi509 Mumbai283 Chennai183 Jaipur80 Hyderabad74 Chandigarh73 Bangalore63 Kolkata45 Raipur43 Pune36 Patna35 Indore35 Telangana34 Cochin32 Surat29 Ahmedabad27 Amritsar27 Lucknow26 Visakhapatnam24 Nagpur24 Ranchi24 Allahabad22 Rajkot12 Dehradun8 Cuttack8 Agra7 Karnataka6 Guwahati5 Jodhpur5 Orissa4 SC4 Rajasthan2 Varanasi2 Uttarakhand1 Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 1485 Section 1435 Section 143(2)4 Section 10(3)4 Section 353 Section 1473 Section 173(1)3 Addition to Income3 Section 148A2 Transfer Pricing

AZIM PREMJI TRUSTEE COMPANY PVT LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I pass the following:-

WP/15910/2022HC Karnataka28 Oct 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148ASection 56(2)

section 163 and the assessment, reassessment or recomputation to be made in pursuance of the notice is to be made

NOVO NORDISK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 12 (2

WP/21206/2014HC Karnataka25 Jun 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA

2

Section 143(1)

Section 143(2)

Section 143(3)

Section 147

Section 148

Section 149

Section 152

Section 92B(2)

Section 92C

section 163 and the assessment, reassessment or - 14 - recomputation to be made in pursuance of the notice is to be made

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) vs. SHRI. CHERIAN ABRAHAM

In the result, the appeal stands dismissed

ITA/282/2018HC Karnataka05 Oct 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 132Section 142Section 143Section 153CSection 260Section 260ASection 292B

reassessment proceedings, held that mere omission to mention Section 143 (2) of the Act equally in any one of the notices so issued is held to be not fatal and would not invalidate the assessment order. In that context, it has been held that the Court is not prepared to think that there was absence of notice under Section

M/S ANS CONSTRUCTIONS LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL

WP/32896/2016HC Karnataka06 Dec 2019

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice S.Sujatha

Section 10(3)Section 35

reassessment orders as well as the - 7 - demand notices dated 17.05.2016 and 18.05.2016 relating to the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. Though the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent to allow the deduction of sub-contractor for the assessment year in question, the same is not pressed. Accordingly, the said prayer is dismissed

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S QUANTECH GLOBAL SERVICES LTD

ITA/439/2018HC Karnataka04 Feb 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 143(2)Section 260Section 268

reassess the income, all the consequent proceedings were null and void and it was not a case of irregularity. Therefore, Section 292B of the Act had no application. 16. When we apply the ratio of aforesaid cases to the facts of this case, the irresistible conclusion would be provisions of Section 292B of the Act are not applicable in such

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. SUNITA TONY

In the result, all the appeals which are filed by

ITA/163/2014HC Karnataka31 Aug 2015

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:3.9.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.3836/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXVIII ACMM, MACT, BANGALORE AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.11,11,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSIT. THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS