BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai207Pune185Chennai174Bangalore136Cochin121Panaji83Ahmedabad34Kolkata33Hyderabad26Nagpur26Jaipur25Visakhapatnam19Lucknow19Delhi15Surat12Rajkot12Chandigarh12Indore11Raipur10Karnataka5Patna4Jabalpur2Guwahati1Amritsar1SC1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 119(2)(b)15Section 45Section 80P5Deduction5Condonation of Delay5

PRL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. BALKURU HALU UTHPAADAKARA

WA/4011/2019HC Karnataka04 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,M G UMA

Section 119(2)(b)Section 4Section 80P

D G M E N T The legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.28871/2019, dated 19/09/2019 is called in question in this intra-Court appeal. 2. Briefly stated the facts are that, the respondent herein had filed the writ petition seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing order dated

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NAVANIDHI VIVIDHODDESHA

WA/4020/2019HC Karnataka04 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,M G UMA

Section 119(2)(b)
Section 4
Section 80P

D G M E N T Though there is a delay of forty seven days in filing this appeal, we have, nevertheless, heard Sri Sanmathi E.I., learned counsel for the appellants on the merits of the matter. 2. The legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.29110/2019, dated 19/09/2019 is called in question

PRL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KERADI MILK PRODUCERS' WOMEN

WA/4019/2019HC Karnataka04 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,M G UMA

Section 119(2)(b)Section 4Section 80P

D G M E N T Though there is a delay of forty seven days in filing this appeal, we have, nevertheless, heard Sri Sanmathi E.I., learned counsel for the appellants on the merits of the matter. 2. The legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.28872/2019, dated 19/09/2019 is called in question

PRL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. SASTHAVU HALU UTHPADAKARA MAHILA

WA/4015/2019HC Karnataka04 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,M G UMA

Section 119(2)(b)Section 4Section 80P

D G M E N T The legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.29583/2019, dated 19/09/2019 is called in question in this intra-Court appeal. 2. Briefly stated the facts are that, the respondent herein had filed the writ petition seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing order dated

PRL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. K. M. CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD.,

WA/4016/2019HC Karnataka04 Jan 2021

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,M G UMA

Section 119(2)(b)Section 4Section 80P

D G M E N T The legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.29580/2019, dated 19/09/2019 is called in question in this intra-Court appeal. 2. Briefly stated the facts are that, the respondent herein had filed the writ petition seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing order dated