PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S CHAMUNDI WINERY AND DISTILLERY

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

charitable purpose. The levy as also the payment was by reason of the regulatory power vested in the assessee-club to regulate racing in accordance with the rules framed by it, non-compliance with which would result in the jockeys, trainers and others being excluded from participating in racing. The levy had direct nexus with their activity as participants

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (4) vs. M/S CHAMUNDI WINERY AND DISTILLERY

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

charitable purpose. The levy as also the payment was by reason of the regulatory power vested in the assessee-club to regulate racing in accordance with the rules framed by it, non-compliance with which would result in the jockeys, trainers and others being excluded from participating in racing. The levy had direct nexus with their activity as participants

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

charitable trust i.e., AOP, when the certificate of registration issued u/s 12AA of the Act, did not prescribe such a procedure and in fact, exempted the petitioner from obtaining any such new number if it had already obtained the same and recorded a perverse finding contrary to the materials on record. Therefore the order passed by the revisional authority cannot

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

charitable trust i.e., AOP, when the certificate of registration issued u/s 12AA of the Act, did not prescribe such a procedure and in fact, exempted the petitioner from obtaining any such new number if it had already obtained the same and recorded a perverse finding contrary to the materials on record. Therefore the order passed by the revisional authority cannot

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

charitable trust i.e., AOP, when the certificate of registration issued u/s 12AA of the Act, did not prescribe such a procedure and in fact, exempted the petitioner from obtaining any such new number if it had already obtained the same and recorded a perverse finding contrary to the materials on record. Therefore the order passed by the revisional authority cannot

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

charitable trust i.e., AOP, when the certificate of registration issued u/s 12AA of the Act, did not prescribe such a procedure and in fact, exempted the petitioner from obtaining any such new number if it had already obtained the same and recorded a perverse finding contrary to the materials on record. Therefore the order passed by the revisional authority cannot

MASTER BALACHANDAR KRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Trust), to the then Chief Minister of the State of Karnataka. He contended that the relationship of the State Government with the respondent/Law School is inseparable inasmuch as the State provided the initial corpus fund and also the land (eighteen acres) belonging to Bengaluru University was leased initially for a period of thirty years and subsequently, additional five acres

SMT. S. JALAJA vs. UNION OF INDIA

In the result, writ appeals are allowed

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

CHARITABLE TRUST Vs. THE GOVT. OF TAMIL NADU', (2018) LAWS (MAD)3 918. It is further submitted that right to property has been recognized by Article 17 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the year 1948 itself which was diluted by the Parliament by inserting Article 31A in the Constitution. It is further submitted that right to hold property

DR M RAVINDRA VARMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

SMT. H G SHEELA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

SRI C THIMMA REDDY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

SRI KRISHANAMA RAJU vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

SRI M MUNISWAMY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

M/S SOBHA LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

SRI. SHIVALINGAIAH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

M/S. SUMADHURA INFRACON PVT. LTD., vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE

L & T CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENT vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TRUST AT NO.59 MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECERTARY SRI V P MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA 146 AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR N R SQUARE