PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-1 vs. M/S RASHTREEYA SIKSHANA SAMITHI TRUST

In the result grounds 3 to 5 of assessee

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

charitable trust registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 19612. It has obtained approval under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. For A.Y.2012-13, assessee filed returns of income declaring income as nil. The case was selected for scrutiny and notices under Sections 142

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. CMR JNANADHARA TRUST

The appeals stand dismissed

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,K. V. ARAVIND

charitable or religious institution, any income thereof- (1) if such trust or institution has been created or established after the commencement of this Act and under the terms of the trust or the rules governing the institution, any part of such income enures, or (ii) if any part of such income or any property of the trust or the institution

MASTER BALACHANDAR KRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Trust), to the then Chief Minister of the State of Karnataka. He contended that the relationship of the State Government with the respondent/Law School is inseparable inasmuch as the State provided the initial corpus fund and also the land (eighteen acres) belonging to Bengaluru University was leased initially for a period of thirty years and subsequently, additional five acres

M/S. PIXEL PICTURES PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: S.SUJATHA

142 DTR (Kar) 281. The relevant paragraphs 14, 21, 23, 24 and 27 reads thus: “14. We may now deal with the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the appellants. The first contention for assailing the legality and validity of the intimation under Section 200A was that, the provision of Section 200A(1)(c)d) and (f) have come

SMT. S. JALAJA vs. UNION OF INDIA

In the result, writ appeals are allowed

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

CHARITABLE TRUST Vs. THE GOVT. OF TAMIL NADU', (2018) LAWS (MAD)3 918. It is further submitted that right to property has been recognized by Article 17 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the year 1948 itself which was diluted by the Parliament by inserting Article 31A in the Constitution. It is further submitted that right to hold property

DR M RAVINDRA VARMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

SMT. H G SHEELA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

K S JUNJAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

SRI KRISHANAMA RAJU vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

SRI C THIMMA REDDY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

L & T CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENT vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

SRI. SHIVALINGAIAH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

M/S. SUMADHURA INFRACON PVT. LTD., vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

SRI M MUNISWAMY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

M/S SOBHA LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

M/S DSR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE

M THIYAGARAJAN vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

142 IN WRIT PETITION No.27756/2019 BETWEEN 1. SMT. VIMALAMMA W/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI M.GOVARDHAN S/O LATE SRI R.MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI G.GIRISH S/O SRI M.GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SMT. SUMA NEELISH W/O SRI NEELISH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3349, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE