BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

426 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 132clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka426Delhi269Mumbai186Bangalore116Chennai97Hyderabad74Jaipur51Cochin51Pune40Ahmedabad38Chandigarh37Amritsar24Kolkata22Lucknow19Allahabad16Calcutta16Indore14Visakhapatnam13Patna12Surat10Nagpur7Dehradun6Telangana6Kerala5Agra4SC3Rajasthan3Rajkot3Jodhpur3Cuttack2Raipur2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income50Section 148A2

AZIM PREMJI TRUSTEE COMPANY PVT LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I pass the following:-

WP/15910/2022HC Karnataka28 Oct 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148ASection 56(2)

charitable entity belonging to the Azim Premji Group, to 4 be held as a part of the corpus of Trust. This gift was contemporaneously disclosed to the stock exchanges and this information was also disseminated to the public at large. This gift was also specifically disclosed in the audited accounts of the petitioner for the year ending 31.03.2014. The face

SRI B V ACHARYA S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA ACHARYA vs. SRI N VENKATESHAIAH

WP/14047/2012HC Karnataka

Showing 1–20 of 426 · Page 1 of 22

...
03 Aug 2012

Bench: V.JAGANNATHAN

Section 156(3)Section 482

charitable trust called “Smt.Lakshmamma B.M.Sreenivasaiah Charities” and the trust was a registered trust and came into existence on 14.12.1995. It was also averred in the complaint that the trust was founded as per the will of late B.S.Narayan, son of late B.M.Sreenivasaiah and as per the trust deed, the complainant and one Sathyanarayana Swamy were appointed as the first

MASTER BALACHANDAR KRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8788/2020HC Karnataka29 Sept 2020

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Trust), to the then Chief Minister of the State of Karnataka. He contended that the relationship of the State Government with the respondent/Law School is inseparable inasmuch as the State provided the initial corpus fund and also the land (eighteen acres) belonging to Bengaluru University was leased initially for a period of thirty years and subsequently, additional five acres

SMT. S. JALAJA vs. UNION OF INDIA

In the result, writ appeals are allowed

WA/1105/2019HC Karnataka24 Aug 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 4

CHARITABLE TRUST Vs. THE GOVT. OF TAMIL NADU', (2018) LAWS (MAD)3 918. It is further submitted that right to property has been recognized by Article 17 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the year 1948 itself which was diluted by the Parliament by inserting Article 31A in the Constitution. It is further submitted that right to hold property

SMT. H G SHEELA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12535/2016HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

M/S SOBHA LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/28992/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

M/S. PARIWAR HOUSING CORPORATION vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9421/2020HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

SRI KRISHANAMA RAJU vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/59/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

L & T CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENT vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/28692/2018HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

SRI C THIMMA REDDY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/34265/2018HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

K S JUNJAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/135/2020HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

SRI. SHIVALINGAIAH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/52084/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

DR M RAVINDRA VARMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8540/2020HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

M/S. SUMADHURA INFRACON PVT. LTD., vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12522/2018HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23888/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

M/S DSR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22621/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

SRI M MUNISWAMY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30168/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

M THIYAGARAJAN vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8993/2020HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

M/S BHARTIYA CITY DEVELOPERS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/37473/2017HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN

ST JOSEPH COLLEGE HOSTEL vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16461/2017HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

132 SRI SREENIDHI V. AND SMT. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATES FOR R2 AND R3(PHYSICAL HEARING)) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BYE-LAW 3.9 OF THE BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, 2003 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL AND ULTRA-VIRES (ANNX- B) ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.24906/2019 BETWEEN