LAKHPAT TRADING AND INDUSTRYS PVT. LTD.,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Blelakhpat Trading & Acit, Circle-3 Industryspvt. Ltd. Jodhpur G-72/73 79/80, 1St Phase, Boranada, Jodhpur - 342001 Pan No. Aaccl 5668 C Assessee By Shri Rajendra Jain, Advocate & Smt. Raksha Birla, Ca (Physical) Smt. Runi Pal, Cit-Dr (Virtual) Revenue By Date Of Hearing 29.01.2026. Date Of Pronouncement 26.02.2026. Order Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, A.M.: This Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As Nfac/ Cit(A)] Dated 26.06.2025 With Respect To Assessment Year 2017-18 Challenging Therein The Rejection Of Its Books Of Accounts U/S 145(3), Estimation Of Income & Reducing Genuine Sales.

68 of the Act and also charging higher rate of tax under section 115BBE of the Act. 16. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Id AO grossly erred in making addition of Rs 334818 in respect of commission paid on alleged bogus sale under section 69C of the Act 17. That

OM PRAKASH BISHU,KUCHAMAN CITY vs. DCIT, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

section 115BBE of the Act on the professional income of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- surrendered by the appellant assessee during the course of survey u/s 133A and which was included by him in his return income. The ld. AO has also erred in invoking provisions of sec. 115BBE on addition of Rs.1,00,000/- made

CHANDAN SINGH,POKRAN vs. ITO,, JAISALMER

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Dr. S. Seethalakshmi

234C 11 In this ground of appeal, the assessee has disputed the action of the AO in charging interest u/s 234A, 234B and 2340 The assessee did not furnish any contentions in respect of this ground of appeal during the appellate proceedings. The levy of interest under these sections is mandatory on satisfaction of the conditions specified

VINAY MITTAL,SRIGANGANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, SRIGANGANAGAR

The appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Blevinay Mittal Income Tax Officer, 3, J Block, Sriganganagar (Raj.) Ward No. -1, Ward No. 1 Keshrisinghpur Sriganganagar Sriganganagar Pan No. Avopm6894P Assessee By Shri Virendra Jain, Advocate (Physical) Revenue By Shri P.M. Mirdha, Addl. Cit- Dr (Virtual) Date Of Hearing 16.02.2026. Date Of Pronouncement 26.02.2026. Order Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, A.M.: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The Nfac/ Cit (A)] Dated 22.03.2024 With Respect To Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The Appellant Assessee Has Taken Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

68 of Rs. 96,13,761/- on account of increase in unsecured loans in comparison to previous year. The Assessee could not submit his submission. All the unsecured loans taken during the year is genuine and fair so the addition may kindly be quashed. 3. The Ld. CIT (A) has erred in sustaining the addition

SMT. PUSHPA CHHAJER,JODHPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

234C. 14. That the petitioner may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternative ground at or before the time of hearing. 15. The petitioner prays for justice and relief.” 3. The facts as culled out from the record are that the return of income for the A.Y 2014-15 was electronically furnished on 25.11.2014 declaring a total income

ACIT, PAOTA C ROAD vs. VARAHA INFRA LIMITED, PAOTA B ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaithe Acit Vs M/S. Vardha Infra Ltd. Room No. 215, Aayakar Bhawan 6 Jalam Vilas Scheme Paota C Road, Jodhpur Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccv 7972 K

234C and 234D." 26 Varaha Infra Ltd. 8.1 The charge of interest under the above sections is mandatory but consequential to Income. The A O is directed to allow consequential relief to the assessee while giving effect to this appeal order. 9 The fifth ground of appeal is as under "The Ld. AO has erred in initiating penalty proceedings

SMT. MANJULA DEVI JAIN ,PALI vs. ITO,WARD-2, PALI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosainsmt. Manjula Devi Jain Vs Income Tax Officer, 1-35, Housing Board, Ward-2, Pali. Pali. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aampj4848D

68. The addition so sustained is bad in law and bad on facts. 4. The charging of interest u/s 234B and 234C is bad in law and on facts. 5. The appellant pray for suitable costs. 6. The appellant craves liberty to add, amend, alter and modify any of the ground of appeal on or before its hearing before your

MANOHAR SINGH,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(3),, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Section 271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c) of the Act being premature at this stage, both the grounds are dismissed. 6. The ground No. 7 raised by the appellant is regarding charging of interest amounting to Rs. 24,49.836/- u/s 234B of the Act. This being consequential in nature, the AO is directed to allow relief

SUSHIL KUMAR JHABAK,BIKANER vs. NFAC, DELHI / ITO,WARD-2, BIKANER

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Ao With All Supporting Evidence But Ld. Ao Ignored While Relevant Facts So The Addition Made By Ao For Treating The Cash Deposit Rs. 5,50,000/- Unexplained & Charged Tax At A Special Rate Which Was Not Ought To So It Is Deserve To Be Deleted. 2. On The Fact & Circumstances Of The Case Ld. Ao Has Erred In Charging Interest U/S 234B & 234C. 3.The Appellant Prays For Justice & Relief. 4. The Appellant May Please Be Permitted To Raise Any Additional Or Alternative Ground Sat Or Before The Hearing.”

234C of the Act is consequential in nature and hence, not adjudicated. Hence, the same is dismissed COME TAX DEPARTM 5. The Ground No.3 is residuary in nature which has not been availed and hence, the same is dismissed.” 5. As the assessee not received any favour from the appeal filed before ld. NFAC/ CIT(A). The present appeal filed

SHRI SHYAMSUNDAR SONI KARTA HUF,BIKANER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,, BIKANER

In the results the appeal filed by the

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honours.”

234C of the Act. 5. The appellant crave liberty to add, amend, alter or modify any of the ground of appeal on or before its hearing before your honours.” 3. The fact as culled out from the records is that the In this case, Shri Shyam Sunder Soni, Karta of afore-said HUF was arriving from Mumbai to Jaipur

SHRI SHYAMSUNDAR SONI KARTA HUF,BIKANER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,, BIKANER

In the results the appeal filed by the

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honours.”

234C of the Act. 5. The appellant crave liberty to add, amend, alter or modify any of the ground of appeal on or before its hearing before your honours.” 3. The fact as culled out from the records is that the In this case, Shri Shyam Sunder Soni, Karta of afore-said HUF was arriving from Mumbai to Jaipur

SHRI SHYAMSUNDAR SONI KARTA HUF,BIKANER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,, BIKANER

In the results the appeal filed by the

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honours.”

234C of the Act. 5. The appellant crave liberty to add, amend, alter or modify any of the ground of appeal on or before its hearing before your honours.” 3. The fact as culled out from the records is that the In this case, Shri Shyam Sunder Soni, Karta of afore-said HUF was arriving from Mumbai to Jaipur

SHRI SHYAMSUNDAR SONI KARTA HUF,BIKANER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,, BIKANER

In the results the appeal filed by the

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honours.”

234C of the Act. 5. The appellant crave liberty to add, amend, alter or modify any of the ground of appeal on or before its hearing before your honours.” 3. The fact as culled out from the records is that the In this case, Shri Shyam Sunder Soni, Karta of afore-said HUF was arriving from Mumbai to Jaipur

SHRI SHYAMSUNDAR SONI KARTA HUF,BIKANER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,, BIKANER

In the results the appeal filed by the

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honours.”

234C of the Act. 5. The appellant crave liberty to add, amend, alter or modify any of the ground of appeal on or before its hearing before your honours.” 3. The fact as culled out from the records is that the In this case, Shri Shyam Sunder Soni, Karta of afore-said HUF was arriving from Mumbai to Jaipur

SHRI SHYAMSUNDAR SONI KARTA HUF,BIKANER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,, BIKANER

In the results the appeal filed by the

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honours.”

234C of the Act. 5. The appellant crave liberty to add, amend, alter or modify any of the ground of appeal on or before its hearing before your honours.” 3. The fact as culled out from the records is that the In this case, Shri Shyam Sunder Soni, Karta of afore-said HUF was arriving from Mumbai to Jaipur

SHRI SHYAMSUNDAR SONI KARTA HUF,BIKANER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,, BIKANER

In the results the appeal filed by the

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honours.”

234C of the Act. 5. The appellant crave liberty to add, amend, alter or modify any of the ground of appeal on or before its hearing before your honours.” 3. The fact as culled out from the records is that the In this case, Shri Shyam Sunder Soni, Karta of afore-said HUF was arriving from Mumbai to Jaipur