ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

house property. Accordingly the disallowance of Rs. I.T.A. No. 399/Jodh/2024 ACIT vs. Mukesh Shah 15 30,000/- made u/s 24(a) is deleted. In the result, this ground of appeal is partly allowed. 5. Feeling aggrieved from the finding so recorded in the order of ld. CIT(A), revenue preferred the present appeal challenging the finding

SMT KRISHNA AGARWAL ,PALI vs. ITO WARD-1, PALI, PALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

property. Therefore, the real colour/ true character of the transactions as discussed hereinabove which are supported form legal and valid documentary evidences which were overlooked by the AO, in arbitrary manner are illegal and unsustainable in eye of law. 8. It was submitted that admittedly the source of cash deposits in bank account had been explained with legal and valid

SMT. REKHA SINGH,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-4,, BHILWARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma(Respondent) Pan: Jdhr06554C

property situated at Kamla Cristle at Kamla Vihar, Bhilwara but wrongly understood as Kamla enclave, a posh colony at Bhilwara, is contrary to the provisions of law and facts of the case. Hence, the same kindly be deleted in full. 5. The appellant prays your honour indulgence to add, amend or alter of or any of the grounds