SMT. REKHA SINGH,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-4, BHILWARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal deleted the trading addition, finding no justification as the Net Profit rate had increased and the AO had not pointed out defects in the books. The Tribunal also deleted the disallowance of foreign travel expenses, finding them to be for business purposes. The issue of deemed rental income was remanded to the AO to determine the municipal ratable value.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and confirmed by the CIT(A) regarding trading additions, foreign travel expenses, and deemed rental income. The AO had rejected the assessee's books of accounts and made a total trading addition.
What were the issues?
Whether the trading addition was justified, whether foreign travel expenses were for business purposes, and how to determine deemed rental income for a self-occupied property.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH (SMC
Before: SHRI R.C. SHARMA
per the municipal ratable value. Accordingly, the matter is
restored to file of the Assessing Officer to find out the municipal
ratable value of the house for computing income u/s 22 of the
I.T. Act. We direct accordingly.
7 ITA 194/Jodh/2018 Smt. Rekha Singh, Bhilwara Vs. ITO
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20/07/2018.
Sd/- [R.C. SHARMA] Accountant Member Dated : 20/07/2018 *Ganesh Kr. Copy to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. The DR 6. Guard File (ITA No. 194/Jodh/2018)
Assistant Registrar Jodhpur Bench
More judgments on Section 22
- Ramani Brothers, Ahmedabad vs The Dy.C.I.T. Circle-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2444/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Anurag Konduru, Bangalore vs DCIT, Circle-2(2)(1), BangaloreITA 2845/BANG/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Sree Sree Annapurna Devi Thakurani and… vs ITO, Ward 29(1), KolkataITA 1710/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2020-2021
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Genext Hardware and Parks Private Limited…ITA 6208/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Sheth Developers Private Limited, MumbaiITA 6204/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026