SHREE RAM COLLOIDS PRIVATE LIMITED,JODHPUR vs. PRINCIPAL CIT(1), JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeshree Ram Colloids Private Vs Principal Commissioner Of Income Limited, Tax (1), Jodhpur C-79, Mia, Phase-Ii, Jodhpur- 342 005 Pan: Aakcs5803L Appellant Respondent

property and cannot be considered as income from house property. In the present case, the assessee is the owner of a commercial

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

properties. During the year under reference, the assessee has shown income from salary, house property, income from business and profession

SHRI JAITESHWAR SEVA SANSTHAN,JODHPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Us By Challenging The Revisional Order.

property and cannot be considered as income from house property. In the present case, the assessee is the owner of a commercial

SHANTI LAL DEORA,SUMERPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, PALI

Appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavassessment Year:2016-17 Shri Shanti Laldeora, Vs. A.C.I.T., Hotel Inder Palace, Bhagat Circle- Pali Singh Circle, Sumerpur, Dist.- Pali-306902 (Raj.) Pan No. Adhpd 4172 A Assessee By Shri Rajendra Jain, Adv. & Shrimohitsoni, Adv. Revenue By Smt. Sanchita Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 11/08/2021 Date Of Pronouncement 08/09/2021

house property and other information during the revision proceeding u/s 263 of the Act. 4] In response to letter of PCIT

SMT. LEELA DEVI SANKHLECHA,JODHPUR vs. ITO,WARD-3(4), JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Dr. S. Seethalakshmismt. Leela Devi Sankhlecha Vs The Ito C-133, Kamla Nehru Nagar Ward 3(4) X-1, Jodhpur Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aobps 7384 G

house property is a separate income and has nothing to do with the income from the firm, the assessing authority

SHAHNAJ,NEAR BHERUDANJI WELL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, INCOME TAX OFFICE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Dr Mitha Lal Meenasmt. Shanaj Vs The Ito W/O Shri Aslam Khan Ward-2, Churu, Near Bherudan Ji Well,Ward No. 22 Churu Sardarshahar,Churu – 331 403 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Fpmps 3570 D

house property at Rs. 15,00,000/-, but the AO denied by the same by stating that the construction of house

PUSHAP RAJ BOHRA ,JALORE vs. DCIT, BARMER CIRCLE, BARMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosain(Respondent) Pan: Aanpb 4456 C

properties were sold by the assessee as he was under requirement of fund for the purchase of house property. The AO discussed

RAMESH RAJ BHRA,JALORE vs. DCIT,BARMER CIRCLE,, BARMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosain(Respondent) Pan: Aappb 7135 G

properties were sold by the assessee as he was under requirement of fund for the purchase of house property. The AO discussed

SUNIL PAGARIA,UDAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

properties and the deduction in respect of more than house property was not allowable in this case u/s 54F of the Act. Therefore

SMT. REKHA SINGH,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-4,, BHILWARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma(Respondent) Pan: Jdhr06554C

house property was declared. Since the assessee was already having another house property at 6-a-42, Chandrashekhar Azad Nagar

PAWAN KUMAR JAIN ,HANUMANGARH vs. PR. CIT-1, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Us.

house property was found. As per this document, the assessee had purchased a house property for an amount of Rs.60

SUNITA AGARWAL,BIKANER vs. PCIT-1, JODHPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh. Sandeep Gosain & Hon’Ble Sh. Vikram Singh Yadavassessment Year: 2016-17 Sunita Agarwal, Vs. Pr.Cit-1, 98, Industrial Area, Jodhpur. Bikaner. Pan No. Aeopa 9467 R

house property. Against the surrendered income the assessee set off the business loss of Rs 20.25 lacs. The PCIT directed

INDU BALA PORWAL,UDAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRE CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, ground no 5, 9 and 11 appeal is also allowed in favor as indicated above

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

properties 19.07.2013 2922425.82 (Vol 3) Limited PO Box 158 BNP House anley ST ST helier jersey 2 Swift inflow origin

ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR vs. SHRI GAJ SINGH, JODHPUR

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) 1. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.85/Jodh/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86/Jodh/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.141/Jodh/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Acit–Circle-1 Shri Gaj Singh बनाम/ Jodhpur Umaid Bhawan Palace Vs. Rajasthan. Jodhpur, Rajasthan. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Afmps-5233-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : & 4. C.O. No.08/Jodh/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No.85/Jodh/2019) ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 5. C.O. No.09/Jodh/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.86/Jodh/2019) ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 6. C.O. No.13/Jodh/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.141/Jodh/2019) ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Shri Gaj Singh Acit–Circle-1 बनाम/ Umaid Bhawan Palace Jodhpur Vs. Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Rajasthan. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Afmps-5233-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) :

House. Following assessment order for AY 2012-13, the income from these properties were taken at Rs.160.11 Lacs & Rs.5.20 Lacs

ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR vs. SHRI GAJ SINGH, JODHPUR

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) 1. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.85/Jodh/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.86/Jodh/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.141/Jodh/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Acit–Circle-1 Shri Gaj Singh बनाम/ Jodhpur Umaid Bhawan Palace Vs. Rajasthan. Jodhpur, Rajasthan. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Afmps-5233-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : & 4. C.O. No.08/Jodh/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No.85/Jodh/2019) ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 5. C.O. No.09/Jodh/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.86/Jodh/2019) ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 6. C.O. No.13/Jodh/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.141/Jodh/2019) ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Shri Gaj Singh Acit–Circle-1 बनाम/ Umaid Bhawan Palace Jodhpur Vs. Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Rajasthan. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Afmps-5233-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) :

House. Following assessment order for AY 2012-13, the income from these properties were taken at Rs.160.11 Lacs & Rs.5.20 Lacs

SUNITA HEDA,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR-2, UDAIPUR

Appeals of the assesses are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, HonʼBle & Dr. S. Seethalakshmi, HonʼBlepradeep Heda, 1A, Babel Ki Bari, Govind Nagar, Sector No.-13, Udaipur-313001. Pan No. Aaiph2617J Sunita Heda 1A, Babel Ki Bari, Govind Nagar, Sector No.-13, Udaipur- 313001. Pan No. Aamph3169D Assessee By Revenue By Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Α.Μ.:

property being House No. 14 was sold on 07/04/2017 (AO Page 29) (a) ignoring that the said property was actually

PRADEEP HEDA,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR-2, UDAIPUR

Appeals of the assesses are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Dr. S. Seethalakshmi, Hon'Ble

property being House No. 14 was sold on 07/04/2017 (AO Page 29) (a) ignoring that the said property was actually

PRADEEP HEDA,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,UDAIPUR-2, UDAIPUR

Appeals of the assesses are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Dr. S. Seethalakshmi, Hon'Ble

property being House No. 14 was sold on 07/04/2017 (AO Page 29) (a) ignoring that the said property was actually