Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ House Propertyclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Addition to Income3 Section 143(2)2 Section 69A2 Cash Deposit2 Deduction2

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 399/JODH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 24

house property. Accordingly the disallowance of Rs. I.T.A. No. 399/Jodh/2024 ACIT vs. Mukesh Shah 15 30,000/- made u/s 24(a) is deleted. In the result, this ground of appeal is partly allowed. 5. Feeling aggrieved from the finding so recorded in the order of ld. CIT(A), revenue preferred the present appeal challenging the finding

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

SMT KRISHNA AGARWAL ,PALI vs. ITO WARD-1, PALI, PALI

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

SMT KRISHNA AGARWAL ,PALI vs. ITO WARD-1, PALI, PALI

SMT. REKHA SINGH,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-4,, BHILWARA