RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,JAIPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Or At The Time Of Hearing Of The Appeal & / Or Modify Any Of The Above Grounds.

13 The impugned land was about more than 15 kms from the municipal limits as existed on the date of notification. The assessee under a bonafide impression that the agricultural land is not exigible to capital gains tax, did not disclose the profits arising on its sale. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS which was finalized u/s

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

13,87,801/- had escaped assessment on\naccount of non-filing of return and on account of such erroneous and illegitimate\ndeduction. To bring this amount of income to tax, proceedings u/s 147 of the Act\nwere initiated in the case by recording reasons and after obtaining prior approval\nof the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bathinda.\nA notice under

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

13,87,801/- had escaped assessment on\naccount of non-filing of return and on account of such erroneous and illegitimate\ndeduction. To bring this amount of income to tax, proceedings u/s 147 of the Act\nwere initiated in the case by recording reasons and after obtaining prior approval\nof the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bathinda.\nA notice under

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

13,87,801/- had escaped assessment on\naccount of non-filing of return and on account of such erroneous and illegitimate\ndeduction. To bring this amount of income to tax, proceedings u/s 147 of the Act\nwere initiated in the case by recording reasons and after obtaining prior approval\nof the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bathinda.\nA notice under

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

13,87,801/- had escaped assessment on\naccount of non-filing of return and on account of such erroneous and illegitimate\ndeduction. To bring this amount of income to tax, proceedings u/s 147 of the Act\nwere initiated in the case by recording reasons and after obtaining prior approval\nof the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bathinda.\nA notice under

AJOY SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

13,87,801/- had escaped assessment on\naccount of non-filing of return and on account of such erroneous and illegitimate\ndeduction. To bring this amount of income to tax, proceedings u/s 147 of the Act\nwere initiated in the case by recording reasons and after obtaining prior approval\nof the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bathinda.\nA notice under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,EXEMPTIONS,CIRCLE,JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN

In the results the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

147 of the Income-tax Act for relevant AY". g "Whether Id. CIT(A) is justified in holding entire reassessment is considered void and illegal without considering the fact that assessee violated provision of section 13(1) (c)Income-tax Act by giving interest free advances to persons covered u/s

OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

reassessment is to be done in two different stages challenging the reasons of reopening and (i) challenging the assessment order. Assessee's challenge to the order of the assessing officer rejecting the objection against the reasons of reopening and assessce's challenge to the assessment order are two separate proceedings. Assessee cannot challenge order of the assessing officer disposing objections

SHRI MADHO LAL SAINI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Reassessment pursuant to material found in search can be done through recourse to section 153C only and not by invoking the provisions of section 147/148. 1.12. The provisions of section 153C are over-riding in nature and contain non obstante clause for sections 139,147,148,149,151 and 153. 1.13. Section 147 and 153C are not interchangeable

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL CHAND SURANA(HUF), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

c) assessment or reassessment, if any, has been made, before the date of receiving the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person, such Assessing Officer shall issue the notice and assess or reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR vs. M/S APOLLO ANIMAL MEDICAL GROUP TRUST, JAIPUR

In the result, the grounds of appeal taken by the Revenue are dismissed

147 and thus, the notice issued under section 148 and consequent reassessment proceedings are quashed and set-aside. 19. Now, we refer to the appeal filed by the Revenue wherein the findings of the ld CIT(A) have been challenged. 20. In this regard, the ld DR relied on the findings of the AO and our reference was drawn

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. KEDIA BUILDERS AND COLONIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the revenue are stands dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

c) of explanation 2 to section 147 of the Act and with the approval of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax? Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in quashing the reopening and reassessment u/s147 of the Act without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case ignoring that the assessee was involved

INCOME TAX OFFICER , SIKAR vs. BHASKAR CHAUHAN, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA no

Bench: Him.

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,- (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, A person other than

WHOLE SALE CLOTH MERCHANT ASSOCIATION ,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTA , KOTA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA no

13-09-2010] examined\nthis issue. Head notes of this decision are as under-\"Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Income escaping assessment\nGeneral -Assessment year 2001-02 In reassessment, Assessing Officer can\nmake addition even on ground on which reassessment notice might not have\nbeen issued, but he arrives at a conclusion that such other income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

u/s 153A cannot be\nsustained and is hereby deleted as the same is without basis of incriminating\nmaterial unearthed during the search action on the appellant and impugned\naddition could have been done by the learned assessing officer in re-assessment\nproceedings by issuance of notice under section 147/148. The Id. AO is directed\nto take necessary action in this

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

The appeal stands allowed

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

13 (Delhi); [2016] 382 ITR 613 (Delhi) wherein it has been held as under (page 622 of 382 ITR): "The court first would like to deal with the question whether notice under section 148 of the Act is a jurisdictional requirement. The rel-evant portion of section 148(1) reads as under: 148. Issue of notice where income has escaped

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

u/s 148 was not\nserved by the AO who passed the order and consequential by the order of\nassessment lacks jurisdiction. Ld. DR has not disputed the primary facts Ld.\nAR has relied upon the decision of our Hon'ble High Court in\nthe case of Mrs. ShubhashriPanickerVs. CIT (2018) 166 DTR 1 (Raj.) (HC)\nwherein it was held

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse to a notice issued u/s 153A, the assessee furnished Return

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse to a notice issued u/s 153A, the assessee furnished Return