DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

reassessment proceeding. Even otherwise the apex court has also\nwhile dealing with the provision of section 147/148 of the Act in the case of\nParashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd Vs ITO [1977] 106 ITR 1 held that;\n\"According to section 148 of the Act of 1961, before making the assessment,\nreassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Income

RAMESH CHAND BANSAL,BEAWAR vs. DCIT, AJMER

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

reassessment, if any, relating to any assessment year falling within the period of six assessment years referred to in this sub-section pending on the date of initiation of the search under Section 132 or making of requisition under Section 132A, as the case may be, shall abate.” What is clear from this is that Section 153A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER vs. M/S SHRI RAJLAXMI DENIM, BHILWARA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed

41 taxmann.com 524 (Allahabad) ITA 1134/JP/2018_ 5 DCIT Vs. Shri Rajlaxmi Denim (iv) Karandhai Tamil Sangam Vs Joint/Addl.CIT (2018) 97 taxmann.com 50 (Chennai Trib). The ld CIT-Dr has also advanced the arguments at length on the point that once the notice U/s 143(2) of the Act was issued by the ITO Ward (3), Bhilwara then no second notice

RAJ KUMAR JAIN,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

41 ITR 465 and Mumbai ITAT Bench in the case of Sandhya Gadkari Sharma vs. DCIT (2016) 142 DTR 129 have also followed the decision. All these decision imposed a duty upon the Learned Assessing Officer for following the due procedure in the course of levy of penalty by issuing correct and relevant show cause notices. These decisions have laid

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

Section 148-A(d) in respect of each of the assesses concerned.” Further, it directed the assessing officers to issue a notice under section 148 of the new regime “after following the procedure as required under Section 148-A.” Although this Court waived off the requirement of obtaining prior approval under Section 148A(a) and Section 148A

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL CHAND SURANA(HUF), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

1) of section 153A opens, the A.O. has no jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Act in respect of those six assessment years which falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of section 153A of the Act and accordingly the A.O. was not justified in issuing notice u/s 148 on 28-8-2006 and in completing the impugned assessment

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. VIMAL CHAND SURANA HUF, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

reassessment has to be based on fulfilment of certain preconditions and if the concept of "change of opinion" is removed, as contended on behalf of the Department, then, in the garb of reopening the assessment, review would take place. One must treat the concept of "change of opinion" as an in-built test to check abuse of power

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessments contemplated under section 153A. There is also no requirement under section 153A and other provisions requiring the Department to collect information and evidence for each and every year for six previous years under section 153A. Therefore, the argument of assessee that the information gathered either during pre-search enquiry or during the course of search cannot be made