DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a) in an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order of assessment\nmade under section 144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back

KATRATHAL GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED ,KATRATHAL vs. ITO WARD 1 SIKAR, SIKAR

144 rws 144B dated 27.02.2024, as well\r\nas the action taken u/s 147/148 and notices are bad in law, illegal, invalid, void-\r\nab-intio on facts of the case, for want of or without jurisdiction, without proper\r\napproval and satisfaction of higher authorities u/s 151 of the Act, and also barred\r\nby limitation and various other

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

section 151(new regime). Consequently, the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated 24.03.2023, stands quashed. 3.5 Hon’ble ITAT, Mumbai Bench in the case of ACIT v. Surya Ferrous Alloys Pvt. Ltd. [2025] 1 TMI 326 after considering the aforesaidjudgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal (supra) has held: Validity of reassessment

VINITA BAJORIA,JAIPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 370/JP/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Vinita Bajoria 1, Ganesh Colony Moti Doongri Road, Jaipur बनाम Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(2), Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AEBPB4873M अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by: Sh. Manoj Choudhary, CA राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Sh. Gorav Avasthi, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hear

section 147, and • The reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 be kindly held to be without jurisdiction, bad in law and liable to be quashed. 6. To support the contention so raised in the written submission reliance was placed on the following evidence / records / decisions: S. No. Particulars Page Nos. 1

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

The appeal stands allowed

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

1) is that reassessment shall not be made until there has been service'. However, the said decision does state that jurisdiction becomes vested in the Assessing Officer to proceed with the assessment once notice is issued within a period of limita-tion. It also emphasized that no reassessment shall be made 'until there has been service'. The legal position therefore

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging payment against credit card bills and earned contract receipts without explaining their source. Notice under Section 148 was issued but returned unserved.", "held": "The Tribunal held that service of notice under Section 148 is a jurisdictional requirement and not a procedural one. Since the notice was not properly

RAJKUMAR ASNANI,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

reassessment proceedings due to significant cash deposits and issued notices under Section 142(1). The assessee did not respond to these notices, leading to an ex-parte assessment.", "held": "The Tribunal held that the notices under Section 142(1) were not properly served on the assessee, as they were sent via email to the counsel, and the assessee

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to sub-section (1), shall stand revived with effect from the date of receipt of the order of such annulment by the Commissioner: 3 Thus, in view of the above, it is submitted that if no scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3144 of the Act was made earlier

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to sub-section (1), shall stand revived with effect from the date of receipt of the order of such annulment by the Commissioner: 3 Thus, in view of the above, it is submitted that if no scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3144 of the Act was made earlier

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ROYAL JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to sub-section (1), shall stand revived with effect from the date of receipt of the order of such annulment by the Commissioner: 3 Thus, in view of the above, it is submitted that if no scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3144 of the Act was made earlier