BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore23Ahmedabad21Mumbai16Delhi13Jaipur6Indore5Kolkata4Surat2Visakhapatnam2Pune1Telangana1Patna1Guwahati1Chennai1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)15Section 14815Deduction6Section 2745Section 139(4)5Section 1475House Property5Penalty5Section 2502Section 249(3)

TANUJ JAIN,JAIPUR vs. ITO WD-7(2),JPR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed with no order as to cost

ITA 305/JPR/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 Jun 2024AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, Adv &For Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 250Section 80E

disallowance which\nbeing completely contrary to the provisions of law and facts may kindly be\ndeleted in full\n4. Rs. 1,50,137/-: The ld. CIT(A) has erred in law as well as in facts in\nconfirming the additions made by the AO of Rs. 1,50,137/ on account of\ndeduction claimed u/s 80E Chapter

2

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 545/JPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

disallowance qua\nTDS on account of non-deposit of same with Government, Tribunal opined that it\nwas an inadvertent error on part of accountant Tribunal, thus, set aside\nimpugned penalty order - High Court by impugned order held that, on facts, no\nsubstantial question of law arose from Tribunal's order and, thus, same deserved\nto be upheld - Whether Special leave

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 546/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

disallowance qua\nTDS on account of non-deposit of same with Government, Tribunal opined that it\nwas an inadvertent error on part of accountant Tribunal, thus, set aside\nimpugned penalty order - High Court by impugned order held that, on facts, no\nsubstantial question of law arose from Tribunal's order and, thus, same deserved\nto be upheld - Whether Special leave

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 543/JPR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80C

disallowance qua\nTDS on account of non-deposit of same with Government, Tribunal opined that it\nwas an inadvertent error on part of accountant Tribunal, thus, set aside\nimpugned penalty order - High Court by impugned order held that, on facts, no\nsubstantial question of law arose from Tribunal's order and, thus, same deserved\nto be upheld - Whether Special leave

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 544/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

disallowance qua\nTDS on account of non-deposit of same with Government, Tribunal opined that it\nwas an inadvertent error on part of accountant Tribunal, thus, set aside\nimpugned penalty order - High Court by impugned order held that, on facts, no\nsubstantial question of law arose from Tribunal's order and, thus, same deserved\nto be upheld - Whether Special leave

AJOY SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 547/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

disallowance qua\nTDS on account of non-deposit of same with Government, Tribunal opined that it\nwas an inadvertent error on part of accountant Tribunal, thus, set aside\nimpugned penalty order - High Court by impugned order held that, on facts, no\nsubstantial question of law arose from Tribunal's order and, thus, same deserved\nto be upheld - Whether Special leave