BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

41 results for “depreciation”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai230Delhi171Bangalore156Chennai44Jaipur41Hyderabad23Visakhapatnam19Kolkata19Guwahati16Ahmedabad14Karnataka13Chandigarh9Cochin8Rajkot8Pune7Cuttack6Kerala5Lucknow5Raipur3Calcutta2Indore2Nagpur1Amritsar1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 153A46Section 143(3)22Addition to Income22Section 6913Section 14712Section 6810Section 143(2)10Section 12A10Unexplained Investment10Section 153C

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. SAPNA KARNANI, TONK PHATAK

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 712/JPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68Section 69C

153C is misconceived and under incorrect assumption of finding\nof Hon'ble Court.\n2.18 Covered issue: The issue of assessee is squarely covered by the decision\nof Hon'ble Bench in the case of DCIT Vs Vaibhav Banka in ITA No.310/JP/2025\nvide order dated 08.07.2025 holding as under:\n\"We also take note of the facts that CBDT's Instructions

Showing 1–20 of 41 · Page 1 of 3

9
Unexplained Cash Credit6
Bogus/Accommodation Entry4

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. SAPNA KARNANI, TONK PHATAK

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 709/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68Section 69C

153C of the Act. Hon'ble Court\nat 50, Para-40, merely stated as under:\n\"40. In view of above discussion the notices issued under Section 148 and the\nimpugned orders are quashed. However, the respondents shall be at liberty to\nproceed against the petitioners in accordance with law.”\nIn view of the above finding, the observation of Ld.CIT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. SAPNA KARNANI, TONK PHATAK

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 710/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Oct 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68Section 69C

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh

SHRI MADHO LAL SAINI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 238/JPR/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Mar 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Shri S. Najmi (CIT)
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 54BSection 54FSection 69

153C r.w.s. 153A and the provisions of section 147/148 of the Act are not applicable in such cases. No contrary decision has been brought to our notice. Accordingly, we hold that initiation of proceedings u/s 147/148 by the AO to reassess the income is illegal being without jurisdiction and Shri Madho Lal Saini and Others. consequently the reassessment order passed

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL CHAND SURANA(HUF), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 62/JPR/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Mar 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl.CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 139Section 143Section 147Section 150(2)Section 153CSection 2Section 250Section 69

153C r.w.s. 153A and the provisions of section 147/148 of the Act are not applicable in such cases. No contrary decision has been brought to our notice. Accordingly, we hold that initiation of proceedings u/s 147/148 by the AO to reassess the income is illegal being without jurisdiction and consequently the reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s

RSD CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 7(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1320/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Khandelwal, C.AFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT, Sr.-DR
Section 115BSection 147Section 148Section 149Section 151Section 151ASection 153CSection 68

153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has over riding effect over provisions of section 147/148. 2. That the whole proceedings undertaken u/s 147/148 are vitiated on account of following reasons:- a. Notice has been issued without jurisdiction and proper sanction. Notice is not as per provisions of law as amended w.e.f. 01.04.2021. Further the new notice dated

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 294/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions and to raise other legal and factual grounds in support of the\ndeletion of the addition. Record reveals that Id. CIT(A) vide page 36 while\ndealing with the appeal of the assessee has issued direction

PRINCESS INFRA & DEVELOPMENT LLP,KOTA vs. ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE-KOTA, KOTA

In the result, both the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical purposes as indicate hereinabove

ITA 859/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Saurav Harsh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT-DR
Section 144Section 153B(1)(b)Section 153CSection 56(2)(X)Section 68

153C of the Income tax Act, 1961 the AO has briefly stated relevant facts and some of excerpts are reproduced as under- ‘’7. The assessee firm was incorporated on 18:09 2015 i.e. in FY 2015- 16, AY 2016-17. As per information available, the assessee firm has partner's capital at Rs. 10,00,000/- and unsecured loans from

PRINCESS INFRA & DEVELOPMENT LLP,KOTA vs. ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE-KOTA , KOTA

In the result, both the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical purposes as indicate hereinabove

ITA 858/JPR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Saurav Harsh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT-DR
Section 144Section 153B(1)(b)Section 153CSection 56(2)(X)Section 68

153C of the Income tax Act, 1961 the AO has briefly stated relevant facts and some of excerpts are reproduced as under- ‘’7. The assessee firm was incorporated on 18:09 2015 i.e. in FY 2015- 16, AY 2016-17. As per information available, the assessee firm has partner's capital at Rs. 10,00,000/- and unsecured loans from

M/S BHIVARAM PANNALAL KUMAWAT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR

Appeal are disposed off and all the appeals of the

ITA 69/JPR/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Us By The Department. The Facts As Well As Issues, Are More Or Less Involving The Disallowance Of Labour Expenses & Therefore, These Twelve Appeals Were Head

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhariwal, CIT
Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 145(3) of the Act and estimated income of assessee firm by applying NP rate of 9.5% subject depreciation and interest & remuneration to partners. Assessment proceeding of AY 2014-15 has been completed by making disallowance of Rs.62,586/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act. Copy of both these assessment order is at PB 85-91. Thus

DCIT, CC-3, JAIPUR vs. M/S BHIVARAM PANNALAL KUMAWAT, JAIPUR

Appeal are disposed off and all the appeals of the

ITA 117/JPR/2021[ 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Mar 2022

Bench: Us By The Department. The Facts As Well As Issues, Are More Or Less Involving The Disallowance Of Labour Expenses & Therefore, These Twelve Appeals Were Head

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhariwal, CIT
Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 145(3) of the Act and estimated income of assessee firm by applying NP rate of 9.5% subject depreciation and interest & remuneration to partners. Assessment proceeding of AY 2014-15 has been completed by making disallowance of Rs.62,586/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act. Copy of both these assessment order is at PB 85-91. Thus

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 293/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 292/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 289/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 302/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 288/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 300/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 295/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 296/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 298/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings