SHAILENDRA GARG,SRIGANGANAGAR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE 6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR
In the result, the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove
ITA 1562/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur07 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)
Section 202Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271BSection 271FSection 40Section 80C
44,333/- towards untraced receipt lying in suspense a/c of Mahka
Bharat
,
Rs.s24,12,930/-, sales tax demand of Rs.4,078, telephone expenses
24,535, business promotion expenses Rs.15,015 &
vehicle expenses
Rs.1,47,989/- and disallowance of deduction u/s 80C
Rs.1.00 lac
1554/JP/24
2014-15
NFAC Delhi, dated 31-08-
Dismissed the appeal
426 days
2023
condonation of holding
