VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

12A(1)(ac)(i) was furnished vide reply dt. 22.03.2024 (PB 113 & 131-144). (v) Details of bank transaction above Rs.20,000/- was furnished vide reply dt. 01.03.2024 (PB 45 & 102-103) and again furnished at Point No.7 of reply dt. 22.03.2024 (PB 113). (vi) Chaturmas means the period of 4 months during which the sadhu-sant do not travel

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

12A(1)(ac)(i) was furnished vide reply dt. 22.03.2024 (PB 113 & 131-144). (v) Details of bank transaction above Rs.20,000/- was furnished vide reply dt. 01.03.2024 (PB 45 & 102-103) and again furnished at Point No.7 of reply dt. 22.03.2024 (PB 113). (vi) Chaturmas means the period of 4 months during which the sadhu-sant do not travel

SHRI SHANIDEV CHARITABLE TRUST,AJMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

The appeals are hereby dismissed being barred by limitation

Bench: Learned Cit(E), Jaipur By Way Of Two Application I.E. One U/S 12A(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act ( In Short “The Act”) To Seek Its Registration. Shri Shanidev Charitable Trust, Ajmer. Another Application Were Also Presented By The Applicant Before Learned Cit(E) Seeking Approval U/S 80G Of The Act.

12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act ( in short “the Act”) to seek its registration. Shri Shanidev Charitable Trust, Ajmer. Another application were also presented by the applicant before Learned CIT(E) seeking approval u/s 80G of the Act. 2. Vide two separate orders of same date i.e. 29.11.2024, Learned CIT(E) rejected both the application

SHRI SHANIDEV CHARITABLE TRUST,AJMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

The appeals are hereby dismissed being barred by limitation

Bench: Learned Cit(E), Jaipur By Way Of Two Application I.E. One U/S 12A(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act ( In Short “The Act”) To Seek Its Registration. Shri Shanidev Charitable Trust, Ajmer. Another Application Were Also Presented By The Applicant Before Learned Cit(E) Seeking Approval U/S 80G Of The Act.

12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act ( in short “the Act”) to seek its registration. Shri Shanidev Charitable Trust, Ajmer. Another application were also presented by the applicant before Learned CIT(E) seeking approval u/s 80G of the Act. 2. Vide two separate orders of same date i.e. 29.11.2024, Learned CIT(E) rejected both the application

BLOSSOM,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

condone the delay in filing Form No. 10A/10AB, as the same could not be filed in such cases within the last extended date, i.e.. 30.09.2023. 3. On consideration of the matter, with a view to avoid and mitigate genuine hardship in such cases, the Board, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 119 of the Act, hereby extends

GO GRAM ECO FOUNDATION,GOVINDGARH TEHSIL CHOMU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), JAIPUR

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

12A(1)(ac)(iii) vide order dt. 29.06.2023 (PB 1-4) but refused the registration u/s 80G(5) by giving the following reasons:- 6 Go Gram Eco Foundation vs. CIT(E) (i) The application in Form No.10AB under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section 80G(5) is required to be filed at least 6 months prior

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER TERAPANTHI VIDYALAYA COMMITTEE,STATION ROAD, PURANI SADAK vs. CIT EXEMPTION, CIT EXEMPTION JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalshri Jain Shwetamber Terapanthi Vidyalaya Committee, Station Road Churu, Rajasthan - 331001 Pan No.:Aaots0584M ...... Appellant Vs. Cit Exemption, Jaipur, Kailash Height, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur ...... Respondent

condone the delay in filing Form No. 10A/10AB, as the same could not be filed in such cases within the last extended date, i.e., 30-9-2023. 3. On consideration of the matter, with a view to avoid and mitigate genuine hardship in such cases, the Board, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 119 of the Act, hereby

UMMAT HUMAN HELP SANSTHA AJMER,AJMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust applied in Form No. 10AB of the Act vide dated: 27.09.2023. After considering the replies of the assessee in response to the notices issued by the office of the Ld. CIT (E), Jaipur, application of the assessee was dismissed

UMMAT HUMAN HELP SANSTHA AJMER,AJMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust applied in Form No. 10AB of the Act vide dated: 27.09.2023. After considering the replies of the assessee in response to the notices issued by the office of the Ld. CIT (E), Jaipur, application of the assessee was dismissed

UMMAT HUMAN HELP SANSTHA AJMER,AJMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust applied in Form No. 10AB of the Act vide dated: 27.09.2023. After considering the replies of the assessee in response to the notices issued by the office of the Ld. CIT (E), Jaipur, application of the assessee was dismissed

UMMAT HUMAN HELP SANSTHA AJMER,AJMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust applied in Form No. 10AB of the Act vide dated: 27.09.2023. After considering the replies of the assessee in response to the notices issued by the office of the Ld. CIT (E), Jaipur, application of the assessee was dismissed

GREETING HANDS FOR ABANDONED RESCUES TRUST,AJMER vs. ITO WARD -2(1), AJMER

In the result, bunch of four appeals of the assessee are allowed for

1)(ac)(vi)] 3 Rejection Order u/s. 80G approval ITA No. 827/JPR/24 [i.e. 80G(5)(iii)] 4 Cancellation order of provisional approval u/s. ITA No. 828/JPR/24 80G [i.e. 80G(5)(iv)] 2. That the delay of 9 days in filing of appeals was due to delay in engage a counsel, who is well-versed by the latest development related

GREETING HANDS FOR ABANDONED RESCUES TRUST ,AJMER vs. ITO WARD - 2(1), AJMER

In the result, bunch of four appeals of the assessee are allowed for

1)(ac)(vi)] 3 Rejection Order u/s. 80G approval ITA No. 827/JPR/24 [i.e. 80G(5)(iii)] 4 Cancellation order of provisional approval u/s. ITA No. 828/JPR/24 80G [i.e. 80G(5)(iv)] 2. That the delay of 9 days in filing of appeals was due to delay in engage a counsel, who is well-versed by the latest development related

GREETING HANDS FOR ABANDONED RESCUES TRUST,AJMER vs. ITO WARD -2(1), AJMER

In the result, bunch of four appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

1)(ac)(vi)] 3 Rejection Order u/s. 80G approval ITA No. 827/JPR/24 [i.e. 80G(5)(iii)] 4 Cancellation order of provisional approval u/s. ITA No. 828/JPR/24 80G [i.e. 80G(5)(iv)] 2. That the delay of 9 days in filing of appeals was due to delay in engage a counsel, who is well-versed by the latest development related

GREETING HANDS FOR ABANDONED RESCUES TRUST,AJMER vs. ITO WARD - 2(1), AJMER

In the result, bunch of four appeals of the assessee are allowed for

1)(ac)(vi)] 3 Rejection Order u/s. 80G approval ITA No. 827/JPR/24 [i.e. 80G(5)(iii)] 4 Cancellation order of provisional approval u/s. ITA No. 828/JPR/24 80G [i.e. 80G(5)(iv)] 2. That the delay of 9 days in filing of appeals was due to delay in engage a counsel, who is well-versed by the latest development related

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

12A(1)(ac)(iii) and 80G(5)(iii). 11. Ld. CIT(E) while dealing with the application of the assessee in Form no. 10AB seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act, as per the power vested upon him call for documents and information so as to verify the genuineness of activities. The assessee filed the required details and information

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos.775 to 778/JP/2024 Uttrakhand Samaj 51/117 Sec 5, Pratap Nagar Sanganer, Jaipur cuke Vs. The CIT, Exemption Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAATU 6874 A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 20/08/2024 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@D

12A(1)(ac)(iii) and 80G(5)(iii). 11. Ld. CIT(E) while dealing with the application of the assessee in Form no. 10AB seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act, as per the power vested upon him call for documents and information so as to verify the genuineness of activities. The assessee filed the required details and information

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPURTHE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

12A(1)(ac)(iii) and 80G(5)(iii). 11. Ld. CIT(E) while dealing with the application of the assessee in Form no. 10AB seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act, as per the power vested upon him call for documents and information so as to verify the genuineness of activities. The assessee filed the required details and information