ZILA PARYAWARN SUDHAR SAMITI,JHUNJHUNU vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

35 (Gujarat) (ii) Hon’ble ITAT Jaipur Bench in the case of Rajasthan Housing Board vs CIT [2012] 21 taxmann.com 77 (Jp.) (iii) Hon’ble ITAT Cochin Bench in the case of Mahatma Gandhi Charitable Society vs CIT [2013] 142 ITD 565 (Cochin) (iv) Hon’ble ITAT Chennai Bench in the case of Madras Motor Sports Club

M/S WHOLESALE CLOTH MERCHANT,KOTA vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 688/Jp/2019 Assessment Year: ………………………… M/S Wholesale Cloth Merchant Cuke Pr.C.I.T. (Central), Vs. Association, Jaipur (Rajasthan) New Cloth Market, Kota. Pan No.: Aaatw 0127 C Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Siddarth Ranka & Shri Shravan Kr. Gupta (Advs) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Ambrish Bedi (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 06/01/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit(Central), Rajasthan, Jaipur Dated 22/03/2019 Passed U/S 12Aa(3) & 12Aa(4) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act). Following Grounds Have Been Taken By The Assessee: “1. That In The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld Pr. Cit(Central), Rajasthan, Jaipur Has Grossly Erred In Cancelling The Registration Of The Assessee Appellant Trust Under Section 12A Of The Act By Invoking Section 12Aa(4) Of The Act W.E.F. 01/04/2013. 2. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter, Modify Or Amend Any Ground On Or Before The Date Of Hearing.”

ab) …….. (b) where the total income of the trust or institution as computed under this Act without giving effect to the provisions of section 11 and section 12 exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax in any previous year, the accounts of the trust or institution for that year have been audited by an accountant

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ab)(vi) of IT Act, 1961. 3. The appellant craves to alter, amend and modify any ground of appeal. 4. Necessary cost be awarded to the assessee.” 2.2 In ITANo.696/JPR/2024 the assessee has raised following grounds: - “1. The Ld. CIT(E) has erred on facts and in law in rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ab)(vi) of IT Act, 1961. 3. The appellant craves to alter, amend and modify any ground of appeal. 4. Necessary cost be awarded to the assessee.” 2.2 In ITANo.696/JPR/2024 the assessee has raised following grounds: - “1. The Ld. CIT(E) has erred on facts and in law in rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,EXEMPTIONS,CIRCLE,JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN

In the results the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

ab-initio deserves to be quashed even after passing the order on the issue by learned CIT(A)/ITAT. The learned AO has issued the notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for the reason mentioned in the notice dated 14.10.2019 as under – “4. In this case information was received from DDIT(Inv)-III, Jaipur. As per information

RAM NIWAS MODI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are disposed off\nthereby allowing the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ab)\nwhich is para materia to Section 10(23C)(vi) the activity of the assessee must be\nbe solely for educational purposes and if ultimately it is found 7 that the activity is\nfor profits the assessee is not entitled to the exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi)\nof the Act.\n6. Applying the law laid down by this Court

DCIT, AJMER vs. M/S V.C. GRANITE, AJMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust (15 taxmann.com 311) being some of the prominent decisions on the issue. However, for completing the assessment of the total income of the previous year in which search was conducted, issuance of Notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act has been held to be mandatory failing which assessment order has been quashed. In this regard

V C GRANITES,AJMER vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE AJMER, AJMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust (15 taxmann.com 311) being some of the prominent decisions on the issue. However, for completing the assessment of the total income of the previous year in which search was conducted, issuance of Notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act has been held to be mandatory failing which assessment order has been quashed. In this regard

PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.,PALSANA vs. PCIT-2, JAIPUR

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 35 To 37/Jp/2021 Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2012-13 Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Cuke Pr.Cit-2, Vs. Limited, Jaipur. Village- Palsana Main Market, Palsana, Dist.- Sikar- 332402 (Raj) Pan No.: Aabap 8390 A Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 02/11/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit-2, Jaipur All Dated 31/03/2021 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) For The A.Y. 2010-11 To 2012-13. 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

ab-initio and liable to be quashed on this ground alone. 2.1 Action of the Pr. CIT is invalid and without jurisdiction: It is submitted the action and direction of the ld. Pr. CIT is without jurisdiction and invalid on the facts and legal position because the ld. Pr. CIT has right or jurisdiction of revision u/s 263 only when

PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.,PALASANA vs. PCIT-2, JAIPUR

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 35 To 37/Jp/2021 Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2012-13 Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Cuke Pr.Cit-2, Vs. Limited, Jaipur. Village- Palsana Main Market, Palsana, Dist.- Sikar- 332402 (Raj) Pan No.: Aabap 8390 A Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 02/11/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit-2, Jaipur All Dated 31/03/2021 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) For The A.Y. 2010-11 To 2012-13. 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

ab-initio and liable to be quashed on this ground alone. 2.1 Action of the Pr. CIT is invalid and without jurisdiction: It is submitted the action and direction of the ld. Pr. CIT is without jurisdiction and invalid on the facts and legal position because the ld. Pr. CIT has right or jurisdiction of revision u/s 263 only when

PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.,JAIPUR vs. PCIT-2, JAIPUR

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 35 To 37/Jp/2021 Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2012-13 Palsana Gram Sewa Sahkari Samiti Cuke Pr.Cit-2, Vs. Limited, Jaipur. Village- Palsana Main Market, Palsana, Dist.- Sikar- 332402 (Raj) Pan No.: Aabap 8390 A Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Shrawan Kr. Gupta (Adv) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri B.K. Gupta (Pr.Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 02/11/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit-2, Jaipur All Dated 31/03/2021 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) For The A.Y. 2010-11 To 2012-13. 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

ab-initio and liable to be quashed on this ground alone. 2.1 Action of the Pr. CIT is invalid and without jurisdiction: It is submitted the action and direction of the ld. Pr. CIT is without jurisdiction and invalid on the facts and legal position because the ld. Pr. CIT has right or jurisdiction of revision u/s 263 only when

SONU DUSAD,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, 1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the results, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: This Tribunal Are As Under :

ab initio. 8. It is evident from the assessment note sheet available on Page no. 1 to 4 of the paper book, provided by the Ld. DR on 24.09.2025, that no valid assessment order has been passed by the Ld. AO on 18.03.2024, as only “doc file” without any DIN or signature is allegedly passed by Ld. AO without

SONU DUSAD,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, 1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the results, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: This Tribunal Are As Under :

ab initio. 8. It is evident from the assessment note sheet available on Page no. 1 to 4 of the paper book, provided by the Ld. DR on 24.09.2025, that no valid assessment order has been passed by the Ld. AO on 18.03.2024, as only “doc file” without any DIN or signature is allegedly passed by Ld. AO without

SONU DUSAD,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, 1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the results, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: This Tribunal Are As Under :

ab initio. 8. It is evident from the assessment note sheet available on Page no. 1 to 4 of the paper book, provided by the Ld. DR on 24.09.2025, that no valid assessment order has been passed by the Ld. AO on 18.03.2024, as only “doc file” without any DIN or signature is allegedly passed by Ld. AO without

SONU DUSAD,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, 1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the results, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: This Tribunal Are As Under :

ab initio. 8. It is evident from the assessment note sheet available on Page no. 1 to 4 of the paper book, provided by the Ld. DR on 24.09.2025, that no valid assessment order has been passed by the Ld. AO on 18.03.2024, as only “doc file” without any DIN or signature is allegedly passed by Ld. AO without

INSTITUTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ITI JHALAWAR ,JHALAWAR vs. ITO WARD JHALAWAR, JHALAWAR

The appeals of the assessee are hereby allowed

ab-intio and liable to be\nquashed.\n5.3 Further the institute on the basis of provisions of Sec. 10(23C)(iiiad) has not\nfilled the ITR and under impression that the receipts/income below the limit.\nHowever when the notice u/s 148 has come to the notice of the assessee it filed\nits ROI income and Audit report which

INSTITUTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ITI JHALAWAR,JHALAWAR vs. ITO WARD JHALAWAR, JHALAWAR

The appeals of the assessee are hereby allowed

ab-intio and liable to be\nquashed.\n5.3 Further the institute on the basis of provisions of Sec. 10(23C)(iiiad) has not\nfilled the ITR and under impression that the receipts/income below the limit.\nHowever when the notice u/s 148 has come to the notice of the assessee it filed\nits ROI income and Audit report which

SONU DUSAD,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, 1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the results, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ab initio.\n8. It is evident from the assessment note sheet available on Page no. 1 to 4\nof the paper book, provided by the Ld. DR on 24.09.2025, that no valid\nassessment order has been passed by the Ld. AO on 18.03.2024, as only \"doc\nfile\" without any DIN or signature is allegedly passed by Ld. AO without

KANCHAN DEVI BHAG CHAND JAIN FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

charitable activities, it is doing various activities and also doing works for welfare of students and for benefit of public at large. 2. The assessee filed application for seeking registration u/s 12AB and 80G (5) on 27/09/2023. Copy of form 10 AB is enclosed for ready reference at PB:1-6. 3. The CIT (Exemption), vide order dated 30/03/2024 rejected