TREHAN SEVA BHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

25 taxmann.com 376 (Del.)DIT vs. Foundation of Ophthalmic & Optometry\nResearch Education Centre\n\nFacially the provision of section 12AA would suggest that there are no restrictions of the kind\nwhich the revenue is reading into in the instant case. In other words, the statute does not\nprevent or enjoin the Commissioner from registering a trust based only

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

25). It is also registered with DevasthanVibhag, Jaipur under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 on 16.06.1970(PB 24). The trust deed was first amended on 31.03.2008 (PB 26-35) and thereafter again amended on 29.01.2023 (PB 12-23). 2. The assessee applied for provisional registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act on 30.01.2023 and provisional approval

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

25). It is also registered with DevasthanVibhag, Jaipur under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 on 16.06.1970(PB 24). The trust deed was first amended on 31.03.2008 (PB 26-35) and thereafter again amended on 29.01.2023 (PB 12-23). 2. The assessee applied for provisional registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act on 30.01.2023 and provisional approval

BHARATPUR ROYAL FAMILY RELIGIOUS & CEREMONIAL TRUST,BHARATPUR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, we upheld the order of the ld PCIT in exercise of his powers u/s 263 in setting aside the order so passed by the AO and the grounds of appeal taken by the assessee are hereby dismissed

8 & 9 of the impugned order, it has been contended by the ld AR that merely because there was no provision for issuing a separate order of registration in 1922 Act, it would not mean that such recognition/ approval is not saved by section 297(2)(k) of the IT Act, 1961. 21. We will deal with both of these

OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

8) TMI 1 - SUPREME Court] - The objects of the respondent-trust are based on religious tenets under Quran according to religious faith of Islam - the objects and purposes of the respondent-trust would clearly demonstrate that the activities of the trust though both charitable and religious are not exclusively meant for a particular religious community - The objects do not channel

RAM NIWAS MODI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are disposed off\nthereby allowing the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

8% only.\nIn present case too applicant is generating huge surplus and profit that further is\nbeing applied in construction of hospital building and plant & machinery (and\nbenefit is going in the hands of land owners.\n19\nITA No. 118 & 779/JPR/2025\nRam Niwas Modi Charitable Society, Kota.\nHence, the application of the applicant for registration u/s 12AB is liable

WHOLE SALE CLOTH MERCHANT ASSOCIATION ,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTA , KOTA

25 taxmann.com 124 (Punjab & Haryana)/[2012] 344 ITR 358 (Punjab & Haryana) [13-09-2010] examined this issue. Head notes of this decision are as under- "Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Income escaping assessment General -Assessment year 2001-02 In reassessment, Assessing Officer can make addition even on ground on which reassessment notice might not have been issued

ACIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE , JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee’s income is found to be not chargeable under the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions made, irrespective of the head of income

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalacit, Exemption, Circle, Jaipur ...... Appellant Vs.

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust. 5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not allowing the allowing the depreciation alternatively claimed by the Appellant. 6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not allowing various expenditure incurred

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST (NOW KOTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY),KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee’s income is found to be not chargeable under the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions made, irrespective of the head of income

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalacit, Exemption, Circle, Jaipur ...... Appellant Vs.

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust. 5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not allowing the allowing the depreciation alternatively claimed by the Appellant. 6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not allowing various expenditure incurred

BHIWADI INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BHIWADI, ALWAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), JAIPUR

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

8. We have considered the rival submissions of the learned counsels for the parties and perused the relevant provisions as also the various decisions cited at the Bar. 9. Before proceeding to examine the issue whether the activities of the assessees fall within the definition of 'charitable purposes so as to make them entitle for registration under Section

SUNRISE SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN,SIKAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: The Time Of Hearing.” 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

8. We also observed that the material collected behind the back of assessee could not be utilized against assessee unless the copy of the same was supplied to the assessee and he was given an opportunity to rebut the same. The assessee furnished full explanation to the query raised. No opportunity was provided to the assessee for cross- examination. Such

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

8. We have heard counsel for the parties. 9. In our considered opinion, the contention which has been raised pursuant to the observations and amendment which is made under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act and proviso which is impressed by the counsel for the department and Section 2(15) of the Act and proviso to Section 12AA which

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

8. We have heard counsel for the parties. 9. In our considered opinion, the contention which has been raised pursuant to the observations and amendment which is made under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act and proviso which is impressed by the counsel for the department and Section 2(15) of the Act and proviso to Section 12AA which

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION),WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

8. We have heard counsel for the parties. 9. In our considered opinion, the contention which has been raised pursuant to the observations and amendment which is made under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act and proviso which is impressed by the counsel for the department and Section 2(15) of the Act and proviso to Section 12AA which

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the depreciation alternatively claimed by the Appellant.\n6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing various expenditure incurred

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the depreciation alternatively claimed by the Appellant.\n6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing various expenditure incurred

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the depreciation alternatively claimed by the Appellant.\n6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing various expenditure incurred

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the depreciation alternatively claimed by the Appellant.\n6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing various expenditure incurred

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the depreciation alternatively claimed by the Appellant.\n6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin not allowing various expenditure incurred