MSB EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KOTA, RAJASTHAN vs. CIT(E) JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, this last objection also no more stands on its legs

Bench: Shri Gagan Goyal & Shri Narinder Kumarmsb Educational Society, Plot No. 1, Burhani Park, Ward No. 1, Ramnagar Nanta, Kota 324 008 Pan No. Aaqam 8644P ...... Appellant Vs.

24 and 2024-25 vide PB No. 109-119 and 120-124, but the same are not found to be abnormal as alleged by the Ld. CIT (E), Jaipur. Rather, the findings found to be baseless and without any basis. Hence, this objection is also not sustainable as the same was formed on wrong notion and figures. 6. Third objection

SHRI MERH KSHTRIYA SABHA,AJMER vs. CIT(APPEALS), DELHI

24)\n(8)Section 115BBC(2) further states that The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not\napply to any anonymous donation received by-\n(a) any trust or institution created or established wholly for religious purposes;\n(b) any trust or institution created or established wholly for religious and charitable

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

24). The trust deed was first amended on 31.03.2008 (PB 26-35) and thereafter again amended on 29.01.2023 (PB 12-23). 2. The assessee applied for provisional registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act on 30.01.2023 and provisional approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act on 21.02.2023. It was granted provisional registration

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

24). The trust deed was first amended on 31.03.2008 (PB 26-35) and thereafter again amended on 29.01.2023 (PB 12-23). 2. The assessee applied for provisional registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act on 30.01.2023 and provisional approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act on 21.02.2023. It was granted provisional registration

OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

section 164(2) of the Act is applicable which is reproduced as under:- 164(2) In the case of relevant income which is derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, [or which is of the nature referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24

SHRI DIGAMBER JAIN ATIKSHAYA KESHTRA,PADAMPUA vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD 1, KAILASH HEIGHTS

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

section 24(a) is not available to Charitable Trusts. The said deduction under section 24(a) is very much available

ICON FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

24 taxmann.com 93 (Luck.) held as under:\nSection 12AA, read with sections 11, 12 and 13, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Charitable\nor religious trust

ICON FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

24 taxmann.com 93 (Luck.) held as under:\nSection 12AA, read with sections 11, 12 and 13, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Charitable\nor religious trust

BHIWADI INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BHIWADI, ALWAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), JAIPUR

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

trust”. 2. The Ld. CIT(E) has erred is law as well as in facts in rejecting the application of the appellant under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 considering that the profitability and applicability of proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That the proper opportunity of being heard was not provided

SUNRISE SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN,SIKAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: The Time Of Hearing.” 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

trust did not produce the books of account, bills and vouchers etc. for verification of the ld. CIT for which the ld. CIT held that the assessee society is not carrying out any charitable activities. Due to noncompliance of assessee society, the genuineness of the activities could not be verified. The ld. CIT, therefore, relying on various decisions including

ACIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE , JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee’s income is found to be not chargeable under the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions made, irrespective of the head of income

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalacit, Exemption, Circle, Jaipur ...... Appellant Vs.

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust. 5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred in not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST (NOW KOTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY),KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee’s income is found to be not chargeable under the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions made, irrespective of the head of income

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalacit, Exemption, Circle, Jaipur ...... Appellant Vs.

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust. 5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred in not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION),WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

Charitable Trust v. Union of India [2010] 188 Taxman 402/327 ITR 73. In that case, Chief CIT, Chandigarh withdrew the exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) stating that the profits are substantial and arising year after year and not incidental as held in case of Aditanar Educational Institution and the assessee should reduce the fees and apply a fresh

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

Charitable Trust v. Union of India [2010] 188 Taxman 402/327 ITR 73. In that case, Chief CIT, Chandigarh withdrew the exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) stating that the profits are substantial and arising year after year and not incidental as held in case of Aditanar Educational Institution and the assessee should reduce the fees and apply a fresh

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

Charitable Trust v. Union of India [2010] 188 Taxman 402/327 ITR 73. In that case, Chief CIT, Chandigarh withdrew the exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) stating that the profits are substantial and arising year after year and not incidental as held in case of Aditanar Educational Institution and the assessee should reduce the fees and apply a fresh

CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION TRUST,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

section 11, which only allows income from trust property and voluntary\ncontribution as exempt.\n2. Further hiring of people on job basis is also against the mandate given in trust deep,\nwhich requires only through community participation. I am afraid that if giving job to\npeople is construed as community participation, would make every trust deed shattered.\nThus, in light

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24