VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. CBDT &Anr. (2024) 8 NYPCTR 418/ 161 Taxmann.com 209(Case laws compilation index PB 46- 53)has held that the cl. (ii) of the Circular dt. 24th May, 2023 is arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and accordingly, would be ultra vires the Constitution and therefore directed to consider the applications

OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes - This is subject to application of other provisions of Act like exemptions, deduction

TREHAN SEVA BHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable in nature, registration of\nassessee couldn't be denied merely on fact that it was not registered under Societies\nAct.\n\nIn the light of above, objection of the Ld. CIT (E), Jaipur is dismissed and further\ndirected that registration can't be denied on this ground. In the result relevant\nground raised by the assessee is allowed

ACIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR vs. MAHIMA SHIKSHA SAMITI, JAIPUR

In the result, all the grounds taken by the Revenue are dismissed and ground taken by the assessee society is allowed

charitable or religious purposes. (4A) Sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) or sub-section (3A) shall not apply in relation to any income of a trust or an institution, being profits and gains of business, unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the trust or, as the case

SHRI KAILA DEVI TEMPLE TRUST,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee trust is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: The Ld Cit(E) On 22.12.2016 Seeking Approval Under Section 80G Of The Act. Shree Kaila Devi Temple Trust Vs. Vs. Cit(E)

charitable purpose which is wholly, or substantially wholly, of a religious nature. There is little doubt that clause 2(h) of the trust deed which permits the trustees to support prayer halls and places of worship sets out a purpose the whole or substantially the whole of which is of religious nature, and this has not been seriously disputed. Therefore

WHOLE SALE CLOTH MERCHANT ASSOCIATION ,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTA , KOTA

deduction of TDS but same was not explained despite given opportunity. Hence the then AO had considered that charitable activities is not applicable in the case of the assessee during this year under consideration. Hence, the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) is applicable in this case considering it a business entity. Accordingly, as the assessee trust

SHREE RAJPUT SABHA,JAIPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

deducting major direct expenses. Then Ld. CIT(E) has arrived at percentage profit (which is again mistakenly very high) supposedly earned by the trust, and has emphatically discussed this supposedly high profit percentage from various activities in an attempt to make out a case that all these activities are commercial in nature and thus are not charitable

SHRI DIGAMBER JAIN ATIKSHAYA KESHTRA,PADAMPUA vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD 1, KAILASH HEIGHTS

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trusts. The said deduction under section 24(a) is very much available to Charitable Trusts, also in respect of any rental

LALITA DEVI SABOO CHARITABLE TRUST ,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Deduction under s. 80G-Recognition of institution, etc. under s 80G(5)-Corpus donation vis-a-vis specific direction-If any voluntary contribution is made with a specific direction, then it shall be treated as the capital of the trust for carrying on its charitable

M/S ZEEN -ZAR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION TRUST NOON HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE,JHALAWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), KOTA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Charitable Foundation Trust, Jhalawar Vs ITO (E) Kota profession is not applicable. However, the income of the trust is required to be computed under s. 11 on commercial principles after providing for allowance for normal depreciation and deduction

BHARATPUR ROYAL FAMILY RELIGIOUS & CEREMONIAL TRUST,BHARATPUR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, we upheld the order of the ld PCIT in exercise of his powers u/s 263 in setting aside the order so passed by the AO and the grounds of appeal taken by the assessee are hereby dismissed

deduction u/s 24(a) of the Act) and a demand of Rs.54,03,271/- was created. Against this intimation, assessee filed an application u/s 154 and in this proceedings, assessee filed a detailed reply dated 28.08.2013 explaining how its income is exempt from tax under the Act. 3 Bharatpur Royal Family Religious & Ceremonial Trust Moti Mahal, Bharatpur

KEEDAY MAKAUDAY FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

deducted that the trust will carry out charitable activity on this object. Section 2(15) defines the charitable purpose. It reads

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST (NOW KOTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY),KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST (NOW KOTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY),KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee’s income is found to be not chargeable under the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions made, irrespective of the head of income

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalacit, Exemption, Circle, Jaipur ...... Appellant Vs.

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust. 5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred in not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction

ACIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE , JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee’s income is found to be not chargeable under the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions made, irrespective of the head of income

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalacit, Exemption, Circle, Jaipur ...... Appellant Vs.

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust. 5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred in not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction