Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

318 results for “TDS”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,107 Mumbai1,857 Bangalore682 Pune611 Chennai535 Ahmedabad386 Kolkata362 Hyderabad324 Jaipur318 Indore233 Raipur214 Chandigarh190 Karnataka151 Cochin137 Nagpur117 Surat109 Visakhapatnam102 Cuttack94 Jabalpur94 Rajkot84 Lucknow61 Dehradun43 Jodhpur34 Guwahati33 Agra31 Amritsar30 Allahabad29 Ranchi24 Panaji23 Patna16 Telangana15 SC13 Varanasi11 Calcutta3 Orissa2 Kerala2

Key Topics

TDS59 Section 271(1)(c)53 Penalty48 Addition to Income48 Section 201(1)45 Section 143(3)45 Section 271C44 Section 200A42 Section 14840 Section 234E

M/S SILVEX & CO. (INDIA) LTD.,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7-2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 900/JPR/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal(C.A.)For Respondent: Shri P.R. Meena (CIT) a

Section 145(3)Section 40

Penalty 1,17,135/- 1,17,135/- NIL 8. TDS Demand 8020/- NIL 8020/- 9. Penalty for late deposit 10,295/- NIL 10,295/- M/s Silvex

M/S SILVEX & CO. (INDIA) LTD.,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7-2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 901/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Oct 2022

Showing 1–20 of 318 · Page 1 of 16

...

36

AY 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal(C.A.)For Respondent: Shri P.R. Meena (CIT) a

Section 145(3)Section 40

Penalty 1,17,135/- 1,17,135/- NIL 8. TDS Demand 8020/- NIL 8020/- 9. Penalty for late deposit 10,295/- NIL 10,295/- M/s Silvex

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 180/JPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDSINCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 189/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 179/JPR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 188/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 185/JPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 182/JPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 181/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 184/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 187/JPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSADY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDSINCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 183/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

DY.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DAUSA,DAUSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, ALWAR

In the results appeal of the

ITA 186/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh Sunil Kumar UppaddhayFor Respondent: Sh. James Kurian, (CIT) &

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS defaults as well as on the levy of penalty on the TDS defaults. The bench also noted that the assessee

ISYS SOFTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. CIT (A), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 528/JPR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. G. M. MehtaFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl. CIT)

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 195(1)Section 271CSection 40Section 9(1)(vi)

TDS and liable for penalty u/s. 271C of the Act. For this failure the Addl. CIT(TDS) passed an order

SH. SWAPNIL AGARWAL,1, AGARWAL DHARAM KANTA, ADARSH NAGAR, AJMER vs. ITO(TDS), AJMER, AJMER

ITA 160/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Smt Monisha Chaudhary (Addl. CIT)

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194ISection 201(1)Section 271CSection 274

penalty order passed by Add. CIT, Range-TDS, Udaipur ignoring the penalty proceedings initiated after 7 years of the transaction

ARGUS GOLDEN TRADES INDIA LTD.,JAIPUR vs. JCIT, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 522/JPR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 May 2017AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri Rajendra Jha (JCIT)

Section 272A(2)(K)Section 273B

Penalty amount e-TDS return (Rs) ITA No. 522/JP/16 M/s Argus Golden Trade India Ltd. Vs. JCIT TDS, Jaipur 1st 26Q 401 days

STATE BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

In the result, the penalty so levied under section 271C is hereby directed to be deleted

ITA 1135/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

For Appellant: Smt. Neelam Ashok (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri J.C. Kulhari (JCIT) a

Section 10(5)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

penalty levied by the AO U/s 271C of the I.T. Act. 2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that an order u/s 201 & 201(1A) of the Act was passed by the ACIT (TDS

M/S WORLD TRADE PARK LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1006/JPR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2018AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Sharma (Advocate)For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (JCIT)

Section 272A(2)(k)

penalty of Rs. 2,79,400/- under section 272A(2)(k).” M/s. World Trade Park Ltd., Jaipur. 2. The AO noted that the assessee has defaulted in filing the quarterly statement/return in respect of the TDS

M/S WORLD TRADE PARK LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 999/JPR/2017[2011-12 (1ST TO 4TH QTR.)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2018

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Sharma (Advocate)For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (JCIT)

Section 272A(2)(k)

penalty of Rs. 2,79,400/- under section 272A(2)(k).” M/s. World Trade Park Ltd., Jaipur. 2. The AO noted that the assessee has defaulted in filing the quarterly statement/return in respect of the TDS

INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), AJMER vs. DIVISIONL FOREST OFFICER, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA no

ITA 358/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. Nos. 358 to 360/JP/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2016-17 to 2018-19 Income Tax Officer (TDS), Ajmer cuke Vs. Divisional Forest Officer Ajmer LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No. JDHD 02557 C vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. Sunil Porwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Anup Singh (Addl. CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing :

For Appellant: Sh. Sunil Porwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Anup Singh (Addl. CIT)

Section 10Section 10(20)Section 10(46)Section 11Section 133Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 80P

TDS) vs. Divisional Forest Officer section 201(1A) of the Act till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee – assessee or the liability for penalty