Search: transfer pricing

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 44clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 201(1)8 Section 2014 Section 2633 Section 1443 Section 1952 Section 143(3)2 Section 142(1)2 Section 56(2)(vii)2 Deduction2

RITA MANCHHANI ,JABALPUR vs. PR. CIT-1 JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‘s appeal is dismissed on the afore-said terms

ITA 19/JAB/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‘Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Bardia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56(2)(vii)

44 lacs passed on 01/10/2014 and 19/12/2014 respectively. The assessment was accordingly completed accepting the returned income of Rs. 8,50,370. The ld. Pr. CIT was, on a review of the assessment order, of the view that the Assessing Officer (AO) had failed to examine the applicability of sec. 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act, in which case

RITA MANCHHANI ,JABALPUR vs. PR. CIT-1 JABALPUR, JABALPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

RITA MANCHHANI ,JABALPUR vs. PR. CIT-1 JABALPUR, JABALPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

HAJARIMAL MISHRIMAL BAFANA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE,

M/S.ASIT DIXIT,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD2(2), JABALPUR