BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 44clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,144Delhi830Chennai224Hyderabad210Bangalore188Ahmedabad146Jaipur133Chandigarh126Kolkata111Cochin64Indore63Rajkot45Pune44Surat34Raipur31Visakhapatnam27Nagpur25Lucknow24Amritsar22Guwahati18Agra17Jodhpur16Cuttack16Dehradun6Varanasi5Panaji5Jabalpur2Ranchi1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)8Section 2014Section 1952Deduction2TDS2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 34/JAB/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

44,79,11,000) (wrongly taken by A.O as Rs.47,00,00,000/-). It also provides for supply of all supervisory services at the time of erection, commissioning, integration of the plant with the existing mill. The appellant has made the payment without making TDS on the ground that the impugned contract is a contract for sale

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/JAB/2014[2009-10]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
20 Sept 2023
AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

44,79,11,000) (wrongly taken by A.O as Rs.47,00,00,000/-). It also provides for supply of all supervisory services at the time of erection, commissioning, integration of the plant with the existing mill. The appellant has made the payment without making TDS on the ground that the impugned contract is a contract for sale