DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding that no income accrued to the non-resident in India as the plant was supplied from outside and assembled by the assessee using local contractors. Consequently, no TDS was deductible.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of demands raised for non-deduction of TDS on payments made to an Italian company for a tissue paper manufacturing plant. The Assessing Officer considered it a composite contract requiring TDS, while the assessee argued it was primarily a supply contract with minimal supervision services.
What were the issues?
Whether payments for a manufacturing plant supply contract, including supervision, attracted TDS provisions in India. Whether the non-resident company had a permanent establishment or taxable income in India under the Act or the India-Italy DTAA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 195,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 5,Section 9
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Hindustan Shipyards v. State of AP14 citing6 SCC 579 · 2000
- 21 Taxmann.com 1288 citing21 Taxmann.com 128 · 2012
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANTSHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, A.M.: These two appeals by the Revenue are directed against a common order dated 31/10/2013 passed by the Learned commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals)-Raipur, Camp Jabalpur [in short the “Ld. CIT(A)”] for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively, in relation to order passed by the Ld. Assessing Officer under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( in ITA Nos.34 & 35/Jab/2014 DCIT vs Orient Paper Mills short “the Act”) for non-deduction of tax at source on payment made to Italian company for supply of manufacturing plant of tissue paper.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 195
- Subramanian Aravind, Tuticorin vs Ward 1, TuticorinITA 297/CHNY/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Gmp Technical Solutions Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 6155/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Sarjak Container Lines Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle 3(1)(1), MumbaiITA 1791/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Universal Tractor Holding Llc, Usa vs DCIT, International Taxation Circle…ITA 2216/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Buttercup Publishing Private Limited, Delhi vs ITO Int Tax. 1(1)(2), DelhiITITA 19/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026