BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 297clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi261Karnataka247Mumbai217Bangalore61Calcutta50Chandigarh49Chennai48Jaipur40Cochin38Ahmedabad33Pune28Hyderabad22Kolkata21Raipur18Rajkot11Nagpur10Lucknow9Surat8Panaji4Indore4SC4Jodhpur4Agra3Cuttack3Rajasthan2Jabalpur2Telangana2Patna1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)8Section 2014Section 1952Deduction2TDS2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 34/JAB/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

297 (AAR-New Delhi), in the case of Roxar Maximum Reservoir Performance WLL [2012] 21 taxmann.com 128 (A.R.- New Delhi) and in the case of Linde AG. [2012] 19 taxmann.com 238 (AAR-New Delhi).” 3. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the assessee company was engaged in the business of manufacturing of paper during the previous years corresponding

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/JAB/2014[2009-10]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
20 Sept 2023
AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

297 (AAR-New Delhi), in the case of Roxar Maximum Reservoir Performance WLL [2012] 21 taxmann.com 128 (A.R.- New Delhi) and in the case of Linde AG. [2012] 19 taxmann.com 238 (AAR-New Delhi).” 3. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the assessee company was engaged in the business of manufacturing of paper during the previous years corresponding