ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

d) "co-operative bank", "primary agricultural credit society" and "primary co- operative agricultural and rural development bank" shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the Explanation to sub - section (4) of section 80P.] 14. We find that, the ld. CIT(A) held that, Section 43B are applicable in the case where any sum as liability was payable

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. MADHYA PRADESH POWER GENERATING CO. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, the Revenue's appeal is dismissed as not maintainable

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

2) of section 143 or fails to comply with a direction issued under sub-section (2A) of section 142; or (c) has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, or (d) has concealed the particulars of the fringe benefits or furnished inaccurate particulars of such fringe benefits, he may direct that such person shall

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, CHHINDWARA vs. M. P. RASTRIYA KOYLA KHADAN MAJDOOR SANGH COLLIERY EMPLOYEE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, CHHINDWARA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‘Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM: This is an Appeal by the Revenue, agitating the disallowance, since deleted in first appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jabalpur (‗CIT(A)‘, for short) vide his order dated 08/07/2020 in respect of the assessee‘s assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‗the Act‘ hereinafter

RAI SAHAB BHAIYALAL DUBEY EDUCATIONAL AND MEDICAL CHARITABLE TRUST,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

D E R (A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.186/JAB/2024 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2020-21 against impugned appellate order dated 23.10.2024 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 25/1069887964(1) of Ld. Addl/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“JCIT(A)” for short], the First Appellate Authority. (B) The dispute in the present appeal started with the adjustment made

SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL ,SATNA vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE, SATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2016-17 Sanjay Kumar Agarwal V. Acit Circle Satna Blooms Campus, Nh-75, Panna Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Road, Satna (Mp)-485001. Lines, Satna, Mp-485001. Tan/Pan:Ackpa2596H (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Sanjay Mishra, Adv Respondent By: Shri N. M. Prasad, Sr. Dr-1 Date Of Hearing: 19 08 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 21 08 2025 O R D E R

disallowing interest Rs.42,16,333/- on loans and advances given by the assessee.” 2. Apropos to the grounds of appeal, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee reiterated the contents of written submissions for the sake of clarity the written submission of the assessee is reproduced as under: - “The Appellant respectfully submits the present appeal against the order dated 12.02.2025 passed

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, passed on 26.07.2024, rejecting the appeal of the assessee against the orders of the ld. AO passed under section 144 of the Income

J.P TOBACCO PRODUCT PVT. LTD.,DAMOH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, SAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadalem/S. J.P.Tobacco Products Vs Acit, Pvt. Ltd., Patharia Phatak, Circle-Sagar. Damoh (M.P.). (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacj7141G Assessee By Shri G.N.Purohit, Sr.Adv. & Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, Adv. Revenue By Shri Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 15/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023

D E R PER OM PRAKASH KANT, A.M.: This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 04.05.2018 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Jabalpur [in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] for assessment year 2006-07, in relation to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) levied by Assessing Officer

HAJARIMAL MISHRIMAL BAFANA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE,

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for AY 2004-05 is dismissed, and that of AY 2005-06 is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM: This is a set of two appeals by the Assessee, agitating the adjudication by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jabalpur (‘CIT(A)’, for short), partly allowing it’s appeals contesting it’s assessments under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated 26/12/2006 and 24/12/2007

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-SATNA, SATNA vs. M/S. RAM KUMAR SURESH KUMAR, SATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gaaleasst. Commissioner Of Vs Shri Ram Kumar Income Tax, Circle-Satna, Suresh Kumar, Satna Birla Road, Satna (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaffr3899D Revenue By Shri Shravan Kumar Gotru, Cit Dr Assessee By Shri Rahul Bardia, Fca Date Of Hearing 13/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023 O R D E R Per Om Prakash Kant, A.M.: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against Order Dated 12.03.2018 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Jabalpur [In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”] For The Assessment Year 2013-14, Raising Following Grounds:

D E R PER OM PRAKASH KANT, A.M.: This appeal by the Revenue is directed against order dated 12.03.2018 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Jabalpur [in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] for the assessment year 2013-14, raising following grounds: 1. “That on the facts and circumstances of the case, Id.CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition

M/S SRBH EBGUNEERING & EQUIPMENT PVT LTD DELHA MOD, SARLA NAGAR , MAIHAR DISTT SATNA(M.P),SATNA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DCIT CIR KATNI, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM: This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (‘CIT(A)’ for short) dated 29/10/2021, dismissing the assessee’s appeal contesting the processing of its’ return of income under section 143(1) of the Income

INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 1(1), JABALPUR vs. SHRI DEEPAK SINGH BANAFER, JABALPUR

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is allowed on the aforesaid terms

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

section 45 as the income of the previous year in which the period of two years from the date of the transfer of the original asset expires; and (ii) the assessee shall be entitled to withdraw such amount in accordance with the scheme aforesaid. 4.2 We may begin by delineating the case of either side before us. The Revenue

ULTRA CLEAN AND CARE SERVICES P LTD. ,JABALPUR vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, both appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

D E R PER OM PRAKASH KANT, A.M.: These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders, both dated 22.11.2022 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] for the assessment year 2019-20 to 2020-21 respectively. The issues involved in both the appeals are common, therefore

ULTRA CLEAN AND CARE SERVICES P LTD. ,JABALPUR vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, both appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

D E R PER OM PRAKASH KANT, A.M.: These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders, both dated 22.11.2022 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] for the assessment year 2019-20 to 2020-21 respectively. The issues involved in both the appeals are common, therefore

PRATHMIK KRISHI SAKH SAHKARI SAMITI MYD. TILHARI JABALPUR,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD1(1) JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

D E R Per Bench: This is an Appeal by the Assessee agitating the Order dated 20-12-2021 by the Commissioner of Income Tax-Appeals (‘CIT(A)’ for short) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’, hereinafter) vide which the National Faceless Appeal Centre (CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assesse-appellant

RAJEEV MISHRA,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI, SEONI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC dated 18.11.2022 under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dismissing the appeal of the assessee against the order of the ITO, Ward, Seoni under section 143(3) of the Act dated 28.02.2014. The grounds

M/S AMBAJEE JEWELLERS JABALPUR,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JABALPUR-1,, JABALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Nikhil Choudhary

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, [in short the ‘PCIT] Jabalpur under Section (u/s.) 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) passed on 19.01.2022 setting aside the orders of the learned Assessing Officer (in short

M/S.SAGAR TOBACCO & INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD.,SAGAR vs. ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM: This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order dated 16/08/2017 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jabalpur (‘CIT(A)’, for short), partly allowing the assessee’s appeal contesting it’s assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) vide order dated 17/11/2009

RAJSILA STONE CRUSHER,SIDHI vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD 2 , REWA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatassessment Year: 2012-13 Rajsila Stone Crusher V. Income Tax Officer Prop Shri Pushpraj Singh, 15 Ward-2 Shastri Nagar, Gopadbanas, Income Tax Office, Kothi Distt-Sidhi-486661. Compound, Behind Customer Forum, Rewa- 486001. Pan:Aalfr4762R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Sapan Usrethe, Advocate. Respondent By: Shri N.M. Prasad, Sr.Dr-1 Date Of Hearing: 16 09 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 17 09 2025 O R D E R

D E R PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.: This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the Learned Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-1, Delhi dated 16.05.2024, pertaining to the assessment year 2012- 13. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: - “1. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) ADDL/JCIT (A)-1 Delhi