Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 51clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 270A8 Section 69A8 Section 115B8 Section 143(1)7 Addition to Income7 Section 271A6 Cash Deposit6 Penalty6 Section 147

AMIT KUMAR YADAV,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SEONI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 166/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. G.N. Purohit, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 272A(1)(d)

section 271AAC(1) passed on 3.02.2022. As both the penalties emanate from the same assessment order and are its consequences, they are being taken up together with the Assessment for the sake convenience. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. That the learned CIT Appeal has erred in law and on facts of the case in refusing to Condon

AMIT KUMAR YADAV,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SEONI

AMIT KUMAR YADAV,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SEONI

AMIT KUMAR YADAV,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SEONI

RAI SAHAB BHAIYALAL DUBEY EDUCATIONAL AND MEDICAL CHARITABLE TRUST,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

YUVIKA ALLOYS,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JABALPUR