Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 270A(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 270A9 Section 69A8 Section 115B8 Section 271A5 Penalty5 Addition to Income5 Section 1474 Section 564 Cash Deposit

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 194CSection 234BSection 234DSection 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 40

270A, 271A and 272A(1)(d) of the IT Act, 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted and against the principles of natural justice. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, charging of interest under sec. 234B at Rs. 9,13,110/- and Rs. 1,16,883/- under sec. 234D of the I.T. Act, 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR